Pennsylvania Supreme Court Tosses Trumped-Up Bogus Election Certification Halt!

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
3,550
Points
930
When it comes to mail sorting equipment and what the software entails and the storage of data? No one can question my expertise....
Based on not knowing how the post office even cancels a stamp, your expertise in highly suspect.
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,634
Reaction score
8,473
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
There is no such thing as an "infrared" cancellation mark.
The USPS cancels out indecias by putting an infra-line through it....fact.

The post offices uses invisible ink to cancel stamps today and you can see by holding the stamp under a black light. If someone tries to reuse a stamp they will get caught.

The UV ink they use to cancel the stamps simply carried over from their routing marks. They were already using UV ink to machine-sort items, so they saved money by using the same system to cancel the stamps


The post office uses UV ink, not IR ink.

And you claimed you knew hat you talking about.
What they use now to make sure that an envelope cannot be re-used doesn't refute my point in the slightest. Let's see those records of ballots that went through a bulk mail sorter as these alleged "mail-in ballots" made the way to their ultimate destination. It is recorded and the number of envelopes are meticulously recorded, Surely you wouldn't be averse to having those numbers made for public consumption, no?
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,634
Reaction score
8,473
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
There is no such thing as an "infrared" cancellation mark.
The USPS cancels out indecias by putting an infra-line through it....fact.

The post offices uses invisible ink to cancel stamps today and you can see by holding the stamp under a black light. If someone tries to reuse a stamp they will get caught.

The UV ink they use to cancel the stamps simply carried over from their routing marks. They were already using UV ink to machine-sort items, so they saved money by using the same system to cancel the stamps


The post office uses UV ink, not IR ink.

And you claimed you knew hat you talking about.
The ink that cancels the indicia can be blatantly obvious by the cancellation of the stamp by three black marks through it or marks through the stamp of a postage machine aka a "franking machine"......
 

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
3,550
Points
930
Let's see those records of ballots that went through a bulk mail sorter as these alleged "mail-in ballots" made the way to their ultimate destination. It is recorded and the number of envelopes are meticulously recorded, Surely you wouldn't be averse to having those numbers made for public consumption, no?
They're available to the government. It's called informed delivery.


It was a descendant of project "rollup"
 

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
3,550
Points
930
The ink that cancels the indicia can be blatantly obvious by the cancellation of the stamp by three black marks through it or marks through the stamp of a postage machine aka a "franking machine"......
Franking machine?

The only website that uses that term was the postal museum in Washington DC Talking about machines from right after WW II
 

AceRothstein

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
5,845
Reaction score
1,276
Points
245
And had they filed before the election the liberals would be saying "How can Trump say the election laws are illegal, the election hasn't even happened so he has no proof of voter fraud."

Yea, the left is THAT stupid.
The lawsuit said the law was in violation of the PA constitution. That would hold before the election, during the election or after the election.

The problem is when you get to file that lawsuit.

You can't wait until it results in an outcome you don't like to raise the claim.

SHUT THE FUCK UP


THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT HAS PREVIOUSLY RULED THAT UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS ARE VOID FROM THEIR INCEPTION


SECONDLY, THE STATUTE IN QUESTION ALLOWS UP TO 6 MONTHS AFTER PASSSAGE FOR CHALLENGES

THIRDLY, IT VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW AS DISCUSSED IN BUSH v GORE (2000)

IT WILL BE REVERSED

.
This is one of the dumbest posts I've seen on the internet.
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,634
Reaction score
8,473
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
Let's see those records of ballots that went through a bulk mail sorter as these alleged "mail-in ballots" made the way to their ultimate destination. It is recorded and the number of envelopes are meticulously recorded, Surely you wouldn't be averse to having those numbers made for public consumption, no?
They're available to the government. It's called informed delivery.


It was a descendant of project "rollup"
Shouldn't be even a slight problem to produce the numbers of mail-in ballots that eventually ended up at a ballot counting poll site, correct? The USPS has to record the destinations........let's see those optical code reader recorded images...how hard would that be???
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
45,001
Reaction score
5,677
Points
1,870
The USPS has to record the destinations........let's see those optical code reader recorded images...how hard would that be???
This is where you would run into the brick wall again. The wall is called, "Give us a good reason why anyone should do this time-consuming, costly exercise for you?". And this is where you get laughed out of court for having no evidence whatsoever.
 

TemplarKormac

Political Atheist
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
44,499
Reaction score
9,073
Points
2,040
Location
The Land of Sanctuary
It's a 5-2 liberal supreme court in PA, were you expecting something different?
You should go and look how they voted in this decision.
I don't recall ever mentioning how they ruled. Its a 5-2 liberal supreme court. Did I say they ruled by that number? Please show me where I made that assertion?
 

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
3,550
Points
930
Shouldn't be even a slight problem to produce the numbers of mail-in ballots that eventually ended up at a ballot counting poll site, correct? The USPS has to record the destinations........let's see those optical code reader recorded images...how hard would that be???
Trump can get all that information either from the post office through postmaster DeJoy, or from the FBI .

I'd be surprised if DOJ doesn't already have all the data, and is sitting on it because it disproves the allegations of fraud.
 

TemplarKormac

Political Atheist
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
44,499
Reaction score
9,073
Points
2,040
Location
The Land of Sanctuary
For the legally illiterate:

"Laches and prejudice can never be allowed to amend the Constitution.” Sprague v. Casey, 520 PA 38, 47 (1988).

That ruling was made on a prejudicial basis, not a legal one.
 

meaner gene

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,921
Reaction score
3,550
Points
930
The USPS has to record the destinations........let's see those optical code reader recorded images...how hard would that be???
This is where you would run into the brick wall again. The wall is called, "Give us a good reason why anyone should do this time-consuming, costly exercise for you?". And this is where you get laughed out of court for having no evidence whatsoever.
I don't think he means by somebody suing under the FOIA. This is data available to government intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

I'd be surprised if William Barr hasn't already gotten all the data, and knows when ballots got to the various election boards.

They're probably keep the data secret because it would only bolster the integrity of the system, and show how many ballots that didn't get postmarks, still arrived on time.
 

AceRothstein

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
5,845
Reaction score
1,276
Points
245
It's a 5-2 liberal supreme court in PA, were you expecting something different?
You should go and look how they voted in this decision.
I don't recall ever mentioning how they ruled. Its a 5-2 liberal supreme court. Did I say they ruled by that number? Please show me where I made that assertion?
It is the inference by mentioning it is a 5-2 court. It could have been 2-5 and the result would have been the same. There's a reason Trump and his allies are losing every case, no matter the political leaning of the judges hearing the cases.
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
45,001
Reaction score
5,677
Points
1,870
I don't recall ever mentioning how they ruled. Its a 5-2 liberal supreme court. Did I say they ruled by that number? Please show me where I made that assertion?
blah blah blah... show us why the Supreme Court would decide differently.
 

BertramN

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
2,298
Reaction score
1,688
Points
1,970
Even the Republican Congressional reps are stupidly ignorant of methods and procedures. Out goes the dastardly criminal halt to down-ballot election certifications, and already. Republican losses in courts advance.

Mostly local news in Pennsylvania knows all about it.


"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Christian and Moslem subjugation of peoples made Jewish in Deut 23: 19-20! GOP! GOP!)
Why don't the impeached president trump's attorneys contact the many, many RWNJs on these message boards? Their legal abilities appear to far outstrip any of the lawyers working on the impeached president trump's lawsuits to expose election fraud.

These RWNJs are self-taught legal scholars but have, in their possession, reams of paper, all containing irrefutable evidence of countless acts of voter fraud, election officials' misconduct, the accepting of bribes to throw out ballots supporting the impeached president trump, and many other criminal acts related to the 2020 Presidential Election.

A few phone calls to these RWNJs by the impeached president trump's legal team, and Melania will be redecorating her White House bedroom to suit herself for another four years.


.
 

Mad_Jack_Flint

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
2,638
Reaction score
1,927
Points
1,903
Shouldn't be even a slight problem to produce the numbers of mail-in ballots that eventually ended up at a ballot counting poll site, correct? The USPS has to record the destinations........let's see those optical code reader recorded images...how hard would that be???
Trump can get all that information either from the post office through postmaster DeJoy, or from the FBI .

I'd be surprised if DOJ doesn't already have all the data, and is sitting on it because it disproves the allegations of fraud.
Bingo!

Trump could have already gotten this information, so why is he hiding this from his great and wise voting base?

Simple, Trump along with his administration and team of lawyers already know this is a farce and are just playing the base as the gullible people they are...
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top