PENNSYLVANIA Files In Support of Texas in SCOTUS

[JimBowie1958]

This is docketed as Texas v Pennsylvania; do they have to change that now?

roflmao, this is hilarious!

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

​

Pennsylvania’s House speaker and majority leader on Thursday filed an amici curiae brief with the Supreme Court against the state of Pennsylvania and in favor of Texas’s lawsuit against the commonwealth and three other states.​

​

A brief (pdf) filed by Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler and Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, both Republicans, requests that the Supreme Court “carefully consider the procedural issues and questions raised by the Plaintiff concerning the administration of the 2020 General Election in Pennsylvania.”​

​

“The unimpeachability of our elections requires clear procedures of administration so that everyone gets a fair shake. Unfortunately, outside actors have so markedly twisted and gerrymandered the Commonwealth’s Election Code to the point that amici find it unrecognizable from the laws that they enacted,” they wrote, adding that the state of Texas “raised important questions about how this procedural malfeasance affected the 2020 General Election.”​

​

In the lawsuit, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleged that Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin introduced changes to election laws, deeming them unconstitutional. The suit also contends that by doing so, those states treated voters unequally and created significant voting irregularities by rescinding certain ballot-integrity measures.​

​

Filed on Monday night, the lawsuit is requesting the Supreme Court to declare the four states carried out their respective elections in violation of the U.S. Constitution.​

​

“The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the Constitution. By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” Paxton said in a statement announcing the legal petition.​

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

 

[JimBowie1958]

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Jim......what gives you faith in the SCOTUS?

Maybe you are not aware of how many times they've taken a shit on the 2nd in the last few years...even WITH Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.

Did you ALSO forget it was the SCOTUS who ensured we'd get ObamaCare illegally passed?

 

[konradv]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

I'm convinced they will. President-elect Biden will be inaugurated on Jan.20.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

I'm convinced they will. President-elect Biden will be inaugurated on Jan.20.

If that happens....they didn't

Of course, if you're Chinese you'd agree a China boot licker is Constitutional

 

[JimBowie1958]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

Two of the states that have had fraud on a massive scale are saying the Texas suit is correct, and one of them now is the PRIMARY state targeted in the lawsuit!

What would make you feel better about the chances, dude?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Jim......what gives you faith in the SCOTUS?

My faith in their own self interest vrs an expanded monkey court.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

Same here but we have to make sure we can say we tried.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

Two of the states that have had fraud on a massive scale are saying the Texas suit is correct, and one of them now is the PRIMARY state targeted in the lawsuit!

What would make you feel better about the chances, dude?

WINNING the lawsuit

Suing is nothing until the verdict is in

 

[Turtlesoup]

Jim......what gives you faith in the SCOTUS?

Maybe you are not aware of how many times they've taken a shit on the 2nd in the last few years...even WITH Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.

Did you ALSO forget it was the SCOTUS who ensured we'd get ObamaCare illegally passed?

Roberts and the other swamp dems will screw us over in a heartbeat but the other 5 may, just may stand up to the corruption of the voting. It's a glimmer of hope anyways. Now if they rule in favor of Ga and 2 of the 3 who may not be for Texas--there are around 20 other states in support of Texas which all applies some political pressure to the SC.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

Same here but we have to make sure we can say we tried.

You two have let the Chicoms demoralize you.

Fight, fight, go screaming and kicking into that great night!

Never let the bastards see you weaken.

 

[ReinyDays]

This is docketed as Texas v Pennsylvania; do they have to change that now?
roflmao, this is hilarious!

The PA legislature filed this requesting amici status ... the PA legislature isn't a party to this case ...

That's right ... maybe you "law-and-order" conservatives don't know this, but only the State Attorney General can represent the State in this matter ... and they have responded

Opposition to motion ...

Along with the legal details, PA want SCOTUS to rule that TX has no standing ... TX herself is not harmed by PA following her own laws ...

"Since Election Day, State and Federal courts throughout the country have been floodedwith frivo-lous lawsuits aimed at disenfranchising large swaths of voters and undermining the legitimacy of the elec-tion. The State of Texas has now added its voice to the cacophony of bogus claims. Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states for yielding results with which it disagrees. Its request for this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred candidate for President is legally indefensibleand is an afront to principles of constitutional democracy.WhatTexas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this Court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about problems with the election that have already been con-sidered, and rejected, by this Court and other courts. It attempts to exploit this Court’s sparingly used original jurisdiction to relitigate those matters. But Texas obvi-ously lacks standing to bring such claims, which, in any event, are barred by laches, and are moot, meritless, and dangerous. Texas has not suffered harm simply be-cause it dislikes theresult of the election, and nothing in the text, history, or structure of the Constitution supports Texas’s view that it can dictate the manner in which four other states run their elections. Nor is that view grounded in any precedent from this Court. Texas does not seek to have the Court interpret the Constitution, so much as disregard it."

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... people are going to get disbarred ...

 

[pyetro]

This is docketed as Texas v Pennsylvania; do they have to change that now?

roflmao, this is hilarious!

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

​

Pennsylvania’s House speaker and majority leader on Thursday filed an amici curiae brief with the Supreme Court against the state of Pennsylvania and in favor of Texas’s lawsuit against the commonwealth and three other states.​

​

A brief (pdf) filed by Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler and Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, both Republicans, requests that the Supreme Court “carefully consider the procedural issues and questions raised by the Plaintiff concerning the administration of the 2020 General Election in Pennsylvania.”​

​

“The unimpeachability of our elections requires clear procedures of administration so that everyone gets a fair shake. Unfortunately, outside actors have so markedly twisted and gerrymandered the Commonwealth’s Election Code to the point that amici find it unrecognizable from the laws that they enacted,” they wrote, adding that the state of Texas “raised important questions about how this procedural malfeasance affected the 2020 General Election.”​

​

In the lawsuit, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleged that Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin introduced changes to election laws, deeming them unconstitutional. The suit also contends that by doing so, those states treated voters unequally and created significant voting irregularities by rescinding certain ballot-integrity measures.​

​

Filed on Monday night, the lawsuit is requesting the Supreme Court to declare the four states carried out their respective elections in violation of the U.S. Constitution.​

​

“The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the Constitution. By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” Paxton said in a statement announcing the legal petition.​

Source: The pro Trump right wing site "Epoch Times".

 

[pyetro]

This is docketed as Texas v Pennsylvania; do they have to change that now?
roflmao, this is hilarious!

The PA legislature filed this requesting amici status ... the PA legislature isn't a party to this case ...

That's right ... maybe you "law-and-order" conservatives don't know this, but only the State Attorney General can represent the State in this matter ... and they have responded

Opposition to motion ...

Along with the legal details, PA want SCOTUS to rule that TX has no standing ... TX herself is not harmed by PA following her own laws ...

"Since Election Day, State and Federal courts throughout the country have been floodedwith frivo-lous lawsuits aimed at disenfranchising large swaths of voters and undermining the legitimacy of the elec-tion. The State of Texas has now added its voice to the cacophony of bogus claims. Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states for yielding results with which it disagrees. Its request for this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred candidate for President is legally indefensibleand is an afront to principles of constitutional democracy.WhatTexas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this Court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about problems with the election that have already been con-sidered, and rejected, by this Court and other courts. It attempts to exploit this Court’s sparingly used original jurisdiction to relitigate those matters. But Texas obvi-ously lacks standing to bring such claims, which, in any event, are barred by laches, and are moot, meritless, and dangerous. Texas has not suffered harm simply be-cause it dislikes theresult of the election, and nothing in the text, history, or structure of the Constitution supports Texas’s view that it can dictate the manner in which four other states run their elections. Nor is that view grounded in any precedent from this Court. Texas does not seek to have the Court interpret the Constitution, so much as disregard it."

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... people are going to get disbarred ...

Jim knows he's spreading fake news.
It's how he copes with the loss.

 

[justoffal]

KAMALA STILL HAS NOT OFFICIALLY GIVEN UP HER SENATE SEAT....WHAT DOES SHE KNOW?

At first glance I was unimpressed with the filings because they all came from states that Trump won....but THIS! This is something very different and very significant folks. Add that to the growing number of witnesses coming out of the woodwork now and you have a Real headache brewing for Roberts who you know is going to try like hell to sweep this under the carpet.

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

Don't look for this headline in the MSM......you'll find it in an actual news paper.

BANG! This is the kind of language that Judges are likely to hear.... This will get a 5 to 4 in favor of I believe with the three progressives rubber stamping the Dems and Roberts ducking for cover behind PC cowardice.

Pennsylvania’s House speaker and majority leader on Thursday filed an amici curiae brief with the Supreme Court against the state of Pennsylvania and in favor of Texas’s lawsuit against the commonwealth and three other states.

A brief (pdf) filed by Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler and Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, both Republicans, requests that the Supreme Court “carefully consider the procedural issues and questions raised by the Plaintiff concerning the administration of the 2020 General Election in Pennsylvania.”

“The unimpeachability of our elections requires clear procedures of administration so that everyone gets a fair shake. Unfortunately, outside actors have so markedly twisted and gerrymandered the Commonwealth’s Election Code to the point that amici find it unrecognizable from the laws that they enacted,” they wrote, adding that the state of Texas “raised important questions about how this procedural malfeasance affected the 2020 General Election.”

In the lawsuit, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleged that Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin introduced changes to election laws, deeming them unconstitutional. The suit also contends that by doing so, those states treated voters unequally and created significant voting irregularities by rescinding certain ballot-integrity measures.

Filed on Monday night, the lawsuit is requesting the Supreme Court to declare the four states carried out their respective elections in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

“The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the Constitution. By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” Paxton said in a statement announcing the legal petition.

Cutler and Benninghoff, in support of Paxton’s lawsuit, further stipulated that “under the pretextual guise of COVID-19, special interests began attempting to use Pennsylvania courts” to carry out “election procedures of their own choosing,” citing mail-in ballot extensions implemented by Kathy Boockvar, the Pennsylvania secretary of state.


JO

 

[progressive hunter]

At first glance I was unimpressed with the filings because they all came from states that Trump won....but THIS! This is something very different and very significant folks. Add that to the growing number of witnesses coming out of the woodwork now and you have a Real headache brewing for Roberts who you know is going to try like hell to sweep this under the carpet.

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

Don't look for this headline in the MSM......you'll find it in an actual news paper.

JO

so the state that texas is suing is joining in the lawsuit to sue themselves???

 

[konradv]

I'm not convinced the SCOTUS will side with the Constitution on this.

I'm convinced they will. President-elect Biden will be inaugurated on Jan.20.

If that happens....they didn't
Of course, if you're Chinese you'd agree a China boot licker is Constitutional

Rich coming from a Trump ass kisser.

 

[mamooth]

Just a couple crank loser Republican reps from Pennsylvania. There are losers like that all over the nation.

 

[mamooth]

Of course, if you're Chinese you'd agree a China boot licker is Constitutional

Do you undersand how insane, delusional and butthurt you sound? In case you don't, I just told you.

Seriously, you're a loony. You need step out of your fascist cult bubble and experience what the real world thinks of you.