Pelosi's husband got violently assaulted

[EMH]

Pelosi attacker was immersed in 2020 election conspiracies​

By JEREMY B. WHITE
10/28/2022 08:52 PM EDT

The connection to the election falsehoods promoted by former President Donald Trump and his supporters immediately led many to conclude that the 42-year-old DePape was motivated by politics — though police have not said what motivated him to break into the couple’s Pacific Heights house calling out “Where’s Nancy?” before dawn Friday.

In more recent years, DePape has embraced the false claims that the November 2020 election was stolen, reposting on Facebook — in an account since removed from the platform — bogus claims by MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and others associated with the campaign.
Pelosi attacker was immersed in 2020 election conspiracies

close enough.

That is the hate hoax blog put up fri am

That same blog claims dePape is anti gay LBQTXyz

FRAUD


That is why it was taken down.

DePape is not anti gay

HE IS GAY

 

[EMH]

A couple years ago, he thought he was Jesus.

That quote comes from Taub, who also was very clear dePape is LEFT WING and so is she and all of the gay SF "nudist" crowd.

Your side has not one dePape associate to the right of The Bern...

Which is who Taub supports...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That quote comes from Taub, who also was very clear dePape is LEFT WING and so is she and all of the gay SF "nudist" crowd.

Your side has not one dePape associate to the right of The Bern...

Which is who Taub supports...

Yeah, I know he's left wing. And crazy. Duh.

 

[EMH]

Yeah, I know he's left wing. And crazy. Duh.

If dePape is left wing

The following lied


Traitor Joe
Hillary
Dykey Nancy
CNN
Facebook
NBC

Whoever said "break her kneecaps"

 

[Ame®icano]

Pelosi attacker was immersed in 2020 election conspiracies​

By JEREMY B. WHITE
10/28/2022 08:52 PM EDT

The connection to the election falsehoods promoted by former President Donald Trump and his supporters immediately led many to conclude that the 42-year-old DePape was motivated by politics — though police have not said what motivated him to break into the couple’s Pacific Heights house calling out “Where’s Nancy?” before dawn Friday.

In more recent years, DePape has embraced the false claims that the November 2020 election was stolen, reposting on Facebook — in an account since removed from the platform — bogus claims by MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and others associated with the campaign.
Pelosi attacker was immersed in 2020 election conspiracies

close enough.

All that... says Politico that still has articles of Trump colluding with Russians.

 

[scruffy]

If dePape is left wing

The following lied


Traitor Joe
Hillary
Dykey Nancy
CNN
Facebook
NBC

Whoever said "break her kneecaps"

Of COURSE they lied.

What, you were just born yesterday?

These people are professional liars, they lie for a living.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

It could be mocking a ban on guns.

It could be mocking the communist flag.

Ancient European people worshipped Thor who represented strength and personal responsibility. (An extreme right wing ideology) Thor carried a hammer to symbolize his strength.

Being violently beaten with a hammer is not the normal way to kill somebody. A hammer is usually used as a weapon of opportunity in crimes of passion. This is highly unlikely to be the case in this situation. A hammer may have very well been the weapon of choice for other reasons.

Personal responsibility is an extreme right wing ideology ?

 

[DudleySmith]

Still no report on what brand of hammer it was.

 

[EMH]

All that... says Politico that still has articles of Trump colluding with Russians.

Politico and CNN parroted the fri am HATEHOAX blog on Facebook...


Which also claimed GAY dePape is anti gay - massive FAIL

 

[pknopp]

Once again we have an issue where law enforcement sits on the evidence (evidence that belongs to the public) which only adds to the confusion.

Are we addressing that? No, we are simply trying to blame the other party. It's really stupid.

 

[citygator]

Once again we have an issue where law enforcement sits on the evidence (evidence that belongs to the public) which only adds to the confusion.

Are we addressing that? No, we are simply trying to blame the other party. It's really stupid.

There’s no confusion. Police aren’t obligated to respond to dumb ******* shitstain conspiracies. They cleared up the events in a press conference the next day and you fuckers just are stupid.

 

[pknopp]

There’s no confusion. Police aren’t obligated to respond to dumb ******* shitstain conspiracies. They cleared up the events in a press conference the next day and you fuckers just are stupid.

Cleared up? Supposedly there was supposed to be someone watching the house. Oddly there seems there was not. Has the person responsible been held responsible?

It's nowhere near clear how all of this went down. As often happens the police release information that then conflicts with information they release afterwards. We see this happen many times in many cases.

A video would clear it all up. That video belongs to the taxpayers.

 

[citygator]

Cleared up? Supposedly there was supposed to be someone watching the house. Oddly there seems there was not. Has the person responsible been held responsible?

It's nowhere near clear how all of this went down. As often happens the police release information that then conflicts with information they release afterwards. We see this happen many times in many cases.

A video would clear it all up. That video belongs to the taxpayers.

You don’t get to ask questions of the victim. The police have outlined the events that occurred. The defense lawyer will defend her client. Your insatiable appetite to manufacture conspiracy doesnt get fed by the rest of us. It’s a sickness in you. It will always be there for you. We don’t care if you are suffering.

 

[pknopp]

You don’t get to ask questions of the victim. The police have outlined the events that occurred. The defense lawyer will defend her client. Your insatiable appetite to manufacture conspiracy doesnt get fed by the rest of us. It’s a sickness in you. It will always be there for you. We don’t care if you are suffering.

Nothing I stated was a conspiracy. State exactly what I said that is a conspiracy.

 

[EMH]

There’s no confusion. Police aren’t obligated to respond to dumb ******* shitstain conspiracies. They cleared up the events in a press conference the next day and you fuckers just are stupid.

Your side says dePape is MAGA


Your side LIED and HATE HOAXED



DePape is


Green Party
Nudist - gay coke whore
Lives in BLM gay themed SF commune
Pals with gay dem state senator
Illegal
Supports pedohile normalization



Keep the UnderwearGate lies coming...

 

[citygator]

Your side says dePape is MAGA


Your side LIED and HATE HOAXED



DePape is


Green Party
Nudist - gay coke whore
Lives in BLM gay themed SF commune
Pals with gay dem state senator
Illegal
Supports pedohile normalization



Keep the UnderwearGate lies coming...

The dude wrote conspiracy articles on his blog. Shit. I read them before they were taken down. I posted the link on here with images. He was a MAGA conspiracy nut. That is a 100% fact. Saw it with my own two eyes.

 

[EMH]

The dude wrote conspiracy articles on his blog. Shit. I read them before they were taken down. I posted the link on here with images. He was a MAGA conspiracy nut. That is a 100% fact. Saw it with my own two eyes.

Those were the hate hoax blogs that went up Friday 2-8am

Those blogs also claim dePape is anti gay

DePape is actually not anti gay

DePape IS GAY

And

UnderwearGate

Is HERE to STAY


Whether or not Israel based Mossad have figured that out yet or not...

 

[citygator]

Nothing I stated was a conspiracy. State exactly what I said that is a conspiracy.

Ok. I lumped you in with the nuts cuz you are asking questions about the break in suggesting there was more to it… you want to know why the security camera wasn’t monitored. Why? What does “there is more to it” mean? Why do you need to see video for yourself on this?

 

[pknopp]

Ok. I lumped you in with the nuts cuz you are asking questions about the break in suggesting there was more to it… you want to know why the security camera wasn’t monitored. Why? What does “there is more to it” mean? Why do you need to see video for yourself on this?

One of my first questions was why they did not have home security. It seems the security was supposedly monitored by the government. That would be security that the taxpayers pay for. I want answers as to how my taxes are being spent. If someone that was being paid was not doing their job, I want them held accountable.

This is same absolutely lame inexcusable excuse we heard in the Epstein debacle.

The narrative still doesn't line up for me either. It doesn't make sense.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You don’t get to ask questions of the victim. The police have outlined the events that occurred. The defense lawyer will defend her client. Your insatiable appetite to manufacture conspiracy doesnt get fed by the rest of us. It’s a sickness in you. It will always be there for you. We don’t care if you are suffering.

You don’t get to ask questions of the victim.

Hey, Jussie, what happened?

DURR