Pelosi Says She Will Impeach President Trump If He Doesn’t Resign “Immediately”

[Coyote]

Lol you’re just butthurt he’ll be impeached twice and only managed one term. What a pathetic reputation to leave behind.

Yeah but it's a waste of time. After Republicans take leadership of the House next election, we are going to have to impeach Biden twice instead of once. We could use our time for better things.

It isn’t a waste of time after what Trump did on Tuesday.

 

[Billy000]

Lol you’re just butthurt he’ll be impeached twice and only managed one term. What a pathetic reputation to leave behind.

Yeah but it's a waste of time. After Republicans take leadership of the House next election, we are going to have to impeach Biden twice instead of once. We could use our time for better things.

Impeach him for what?

 

[Coyote]

Proving that she is the one who is mentally unfit to remain in office, Pelosi makes this absurd, insane, and knowingly inflammatory declaration knowing (or not) President Trump will be out of office well before she could EVER get her latest coup attempt out of the House and to the Senate.

For all of the Democrats' talk of wanting to UNITE the country, this comment was made with the intent to piss off millions of Americans and further divide the nation....

....either that or she's just BATSHIT CRAZY!

Pelosi Says She Will Impeach President Trump If He Doesn't Resign "Immediately" | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday threatened the President and said she will impeach Trump if he doesn’t resign “immediately.” According to The New York Times, Pelosi told the House Democrat caucus that she would move to impeach Trump over his role in inciting violence at the US Capitol.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

**** pelosi!

Isn’t she a little old for you?

 

[jbrownson0831]

Oh really.

Like Rump himself?

Like the Military? Or anyone else not home during an election?

Like everyday citizens in Washington and Utah and AridZona who have been running their elections by mail REGULARLY?

And you somehow muddled through the last twelve months WITHOUT NOTICING there's an infectious pandemic going on, which spreads in places of densely-packed people, such as a polling place where people are known to have to stand in line for HOURS???

And ALL OF THIS sailed right over your head, did it?

Like I said, Democrats have been pushing mail-in for years long before the virus for the reasons I stated. The virus was just an excuse. People go shopping all the time: grocery shopping, drug store, Walmart, fast food. Voting is no different. I have comorbidity and 60 years old, and I went out and voted in person. They were actually much stricter than bars and Walmart.

Mail in is fine for people who simply cannot get to the polls, but it should be restricted to those people only. If you're in the military, going to be out of town, live in a nursing home and can't get to the polls, physically impaired, that's understandable. You should have to request a ballot, when returned, the signature must match, and I have no problem with that. But that didn't happen in some places this election.

Oddly enough, the places you want to change these voting laws are led by Republican legislatures. Everyone has the right to vote, and if they want to do it via mail-in, so be it. Just because you didn't like the outcomes doesn't make your argument right. Put down that cup of voter suppression, it's reveling who you really are.... pssst "Anti-American."

Baloney. True voting is done in person with the exceptions Ray stated. He is exactly right and its the only to ensure quality control of the votes. No wonder you are against it.

Since when?

Since when what?

True voting is only by person?

Of course with the legitimate exceptions noted. And virus ballots ruin the quality control.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Lower income shouldn’t be allowed to vote?

Where did I say that? I said they are generally politically ignorant voters, and we would have better results with more politically educated voters. Also I'm saying that people who put forth an effort to vote really care about voting; not mailing a ballot to everybody and their mother to fill out and mail it back in.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Oh really.

Like Rump himself?

Like the Military? Or anyone else not home during an election?

Like everyday citizens in Washington and Utah and AridZona who have been running their elections by mail REGULARLY?

And you somehow muddled through the last twelve months WITHOUT NOTICING there's an infectious pandemic going on, which spreads in places of densely-packed people, such as a polling place where people are known to have to stand in line for HOURS???

And ALL OF THIS sailed right over your head, did it?

Like I said, Democrats have been pushing mail-in for years long before the virus for the reasons I stated. The virus was just an excuse. People go shopping all the time: grocery shopping, drug store, Walmart, fast food. Voting is no different. I have comorbidity and 60 years old, and I went out and voted in person. They were actually much stricter than bars and Walmart.

Mail in is fine for people who simply cannot get to the polls, but it should be restricted to those people only. If you're in the military, going to be out of town, live in a nursing home and can't get to the polls, physically impaired, that's understandable. You should have to request a ballot, when returned, the signature must match, and I have no problem with that. But that didn't happen in some places this election.

Oddly enough, the places you want to change these voting laws are led by Republican legislatures. Everyone has the right to vote, and if they want to do it via mail-in, so be it. Just because you didn't like the outcomes doesn't make your argument right. Put down that cup of voter suppression, it's reveling who you really are.... pssst "Anti-American."

Baloney. True voting is done in person with the exceptions Ray stated. He is exactly right and its the only to ensure quality control of the votes. No wonder you are against it.

It was never a problem before 2020 when polls started showing Trump might lose.

Virus mailins

 

[badbob85037]

Who gets to determine who is “politically informed” and how do you determine what constitutes “political knowledge”?

They could make you take a simple test, even multiple choice on things you should know as a voter. For instance: what party does the current President belong to? What party does the VP belong to? What party is in leadership of the House; the Senate. Is our country in debt or no debt at all?

Like I said, relatively easy questions like those that anybody voting should know.

Most people are more concerned with local issues: education, crime levels, jobs. Tbey vote according to their local priorities. How exactly would your questions address that?

Even the question “is our country in debt” is not an easy yes/no question and reflects a partisan slant.

You know all those democrats talked a lot of what they would give you but never once did they say a word on any debt.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Impeach him for what?

For anything the Republicans feel like. Your party set a new precedent: no impeachable offense and no crime committed. So now we can impeach simply because we don't like the guy. Shoe hurts on the other foot, don't it?

 

[meaner gene]

If only politically informed people were allowed to vote, we would have much better leaders in this country. And to be honest, if it were up to me, everybody would have to take a short and simple test of their political knowledge before getting a ballot.

You know most immigrants that became citizens, know more about american politics and history than the average american.

Most of the conservatives at work when asked a political quiz, said they don't have to know that, they were born here. I asked them who their state representatives were, and they didn't care.

Yeah, if everybody had to pass the citizenship test, only immigrants would vote.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

And again it is clear that the democrats apparently believe that Biden winning the election means that everyone agrees with them and everyone hates TRUMP! like they do.

Seems pretty far fetched, even for an magafag.

 

[Arresmillao]

Proving that she is the one who is mentally unfit to remain in office, Pelosi makes this absurd, insane, and knowingly inflammatory declaration knowing (or not) President Trump will be out of office well before she could EVER get her latest coup attempt out of the House and to the Senate.

For all of the Democrats' talk of wanting to UNITE the country, this comment was made with the intent to piss off millions of Americans and further divide the nation....

....either that or she's just BATSHIT CRAZY!

Pelosi Says She Will Impeach President Trump If He Doesn't Resign "Immediately" | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday threatened the President and said she will impeach Trump if he doesn’t resign “immediately.” According to The New York Times, Pelosi told the House Democrat caucus that she would move to impeach Trump over his role in inciting violence at the US Capitol.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

atta gurl, impeach the scumbag!!!!!!!

 

[Coyote]

Oh really.

Like Rump himself?

Like the Military? Or anyone else not home during an election?

Like everyday citizens in Washington and Utah and AridZona who have been running their elections by mail REGULARLY?

And you somehow muddled through the last twelve months WITHOUT NOTICING there's an infectious pandemic going on, which spreads in places of densely-packed people, such as a polling place where people are known to have to stand in line for HOURS???

And ALL OF THIS sailed right over your head, did it?

Like I said, Democrats have been pushing mail-in for years long before the virus for the reasons I stated. The virus was just an excuse. People go shopping all the time: grocery shopping, drug store, Walmart, fast food. Voting is no different. I have comorbidity and 60 years old, and I went out and voted in person. They were actually much stricter than bars and Walmart.

Mail in is fine for people who simply cannot get to the polls, but it should be restricted to those people only. If you're in the military, going to be out of town, live in a nursing home and can't get to the polls, physically impaired, that's understandable. You should have to request a ballot, when returned, the signature must match, and I have no problem with that. But that didn't happen in some places this election.

Oddly enough, the places you want to change these voting laws are led by Republican legislatures. Everyone has the right to vote, and if they want to do it via mail-in, so be it. Just because you didn't like the outcomes doesn't make your argument right. Put down that cup of voter suppression, it's reveling who you really are.... pssst "Anti-American."

Baloney. True voting is done in person with the exceptions Ray stated. He is exactly right and its the only to ensure quality control of the votes. No wonder you are against it.

Since when?

Since when what?

True voting is only by person?

Of course with the legitimate exceptions noted. And virus ballots ruin the quality control.

No evidence to support that.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You know most immigrants that became citizens, know more about american politics and history than the average american.

Most of the conservatives at work when asked a political quiz, said they don't have to know that, they were born here. I asked them who their state representatives were, and they didn't care.

Yeah, if everybody had to pass the citizenship test, only immigrants would vote.

I'm not talking a history test here. I'm talking about knowing something......anything about what's going on in our country today. I don't care if it's Republicans or Democrats. If you don't know a thing about what you're voting on, you shouldn't vote.

 

[Billy000]

Impeach him for what?

For anything the Republicans feel like. Your party set a new precedent: no impeachable offense and no crime committed. So now we can impeach simply because we don't like the guy. Shoe hurts on the other foot, don't it?

Lol you’re hilarious. If Obama did 1/8 of the shit Trump did in 4 years you would have demanded impeachment. Deep down you know it’s true.

 

[Coyote]

You know most immigrants that became citizens, know more about american politics and history than the average american.

Most of the conservatives at work when asked a political quiz, said they don't have to know that, they were born here. I asked them who their state representatives were, and they didn't care.

Yeah, if everybody had to pass the citizenship test, only immigrants would vote.

I'm not talking a history test here. I'm talking about knowing something......anything about what's going on in our country today. I don't care if it's Republicans or Democrats. If you don't know a thing about what you're voting on, you shouldn't vote.

There is no way to rationally do that...every local issue would have to have a test around it. People care a lot about some things and are knowledgeable but don’t care at all about other things.

I understand the frustration but there is no way do it with abuse and disenfranchisement.

 

[meaner gene]

Are you highly educated? If so, tell me what makes them great for the rest of us? What do they know about the purpose of life that poor folk are missing? After all, you are implying the highly educated vote left and that is great for America.

The highly educated see the big picture, but like the big picture that means that they are out for the species, and not for the individual. Which is why a democracy should listen to all voices, the intelligent, and the ignorant.

After all, I should point out the biggest group of "ignorant" voters, are the right to lifers. If you ask them why they vote how they vote, and that will be the single reason. Next come the 2nd amendment folks. And the list goes on from there.

They asked Sarah Palin about supreme court cases, and the only one she knew was Roe v Wade.

And she was a governor.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Oh really.

Like Rump himself?

Like the Military? Or anyone else not home during an election?

Like everyday citizens in Washington and Utah and AridZona who have been running their elections by mail REGULARLY?

And you somehow muddled through the last twelve months WITHOUT NOTICING there's an infectious pandemic going on, which spreads in places of densely-packed people, such as a polling place where people are known to have to stand in line for HOURS???

And ALL OF THIS sailed right over your head, did it?

Like I said, Democrats have been pushing mail-in for years long before the virus for the reasons I stated. The virus was just an excuse. People go shopping all the time: grocery shopping, drug store, Walmart, fast food. Voting is no different. I have comorbidity and 60 years old, and I went out and voted in person. They were actually much stricter than bars and Walmart.

Mail in is fine for people who simply cannot get to the polls, but it should be restricted to those people only. If you're in the military, going to be out of town, live in a nursing home and can't get to the polls, physically impaired, that's understandable. You should have to request a ballot, when returned, the signature must match, and I have no problem with that. But that didn't happen in some places this election.

Oddly enough, the places you want to change these voting laws are led by Republican legislatures. Everyone has the right to vote, and if they want to do it via mail-in, so be it. Just because you didn't like the outcomes doesn't make your argument right. Put down that cup of voter suppression, it's reveling who you really are.... pssst "Anti-American."

Baloney. True voting is done in person with the exceptions Ray stated. He is exactly right and its the only to ensure quality control of the votes. No wonder you are against it.

Since when?

Since when what?

True voting is only by person?

Of course with the legitimate exceptions noted. And virus ballots ruin the quality control.

No evidence to support that.

Just the massive increase in mailins with no quality control on the ballots is evidence enough. Impossible to verify all those ballots in the timeframes supposedly done. Should never have been allowed to do a mailin ballot because of the virus.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Impeach him for what?

For anything the Republicans feel like. Your party set a new precedent: no impeachable offense and no crime committed. So now we can impeach simply because we don't like the guy. Shoe hurts on the other foot, don't it?

Lol you’re hilarious. If Obama did 1/8 of the shit Trump did in 4 years you would have demanded impeachment. Deep down you know it’s true.

Obammy did tons more to hurt our country that's how we got Trump to begin with remember?

 

[meaner gene]

They could make you take a simple test, even multiple choice on things you should know as a voter. For instance: what party does the current President belong to? What party does the VP belong to? What party is in leadership of the House; the Senate. Is our country in debt or no debt at all?

Like I said, relatively easy questions like those that anybody voting should know.

What about, who had the biggest inaugural attendance?

Get it wrong, and you're not allowed to vote?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Pelosi wants one thing. To stop Trump from running in 2024. Resignation. Impeachment. 25th Amendment. Something. Anything. Stop a Trump candidacy in four years. She forgot something.
Donald Trump Jr
Eric Trump
Ivanka Trump

All eligible and believers in America First.