What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pelosi gets her puppets for partisan Jan. 6 commission

The Purge

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Messages
17,541
Reaction score
7,049
Points
400
The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold.

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

The Times story opened with this paragraph:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders in Congress from joining a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, saying their conduct suggested they could not be trusted to participate.

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

Now look at the following paragraph in the Times story:

In an unusual move, Ms. Pelosi announced that she was rejecting Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom amplified Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, joined their party's efforts to challenge President Biden's victory on Jan. 6 and have opposed efforts to investigate the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.

The language of the foregoing paragraph suggests that any Republican who opposes the re-election of Biden — or the election of some other Democrat — in 2024 will face the wrath of Pelosi. This paragraph also indicates the proposition that a Republican who raises questions about "election fraud" is, as night follows day, a liar.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

“both of whom amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud”

They just can’t help themselves from perpetuating the Big Lie that election fraud is a big lie. What we now know, without qualification, is that the fraud was real and widespread...we just don’t know yet how deep it was. Only audits will reveal that. But Trump’s claim is veritably NOT false.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
114,525
Reaction score
18,433
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
Dems were stupid for trying to make it bipartisan in the first place. Repubs were actively lying to cover up for Drumpf. Why did they think it would be any different or more effective than a group that is going to find the facts?
 

WillHaftawaite

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
68,437
Reaction score
26,715
Points
2,250
I guess Pelosi believes the Democrats have started a thousand year Reich.

or is too stupid to realize what comes around, goes around.

She kicks off Republicans for being 'too partisan', Republicans will be able to do the same thing once they are back in charge.

The 'Ice Queen' has created a slippery slope.
 

my2¢

So it goes
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2010
Messages
11,787
Reaction score
3,163
Points
290
Location
State 48
2021, the year of the Ninja commissions.
 

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
74,363
Reaction score
36,869
Points
2,330
Again, Speaker Pelosi's partisan political theater is a waste of tax payer money, especially after the bipartisan Senate committee has released its investigation report on 1/6.

After Speaker Pelosi made history - for being the ONLY House Speaker to ever attempt 2 (failed) Impeachments, the first to attempt to Impeach the same President twice (and fail), the 1st House Speaker to attempt to Impeach a US President based on ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses, and the 1st House Speaker to argue that none of those things are needed to Impeach a President - the last person in Washington DC who should be allowed to lead nay type of investigation is house Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as she has absolutely ZERO credibility left.






 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
76,072
Reaction score
47,766
Points
2,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
Again, Speaker Pelosi's partisan political theater is a waste of tax payer money, especially after the bipartisan Senate committee has released its investigation report on 1/6.

After Speaker Pelosi made history - for being the ONLY House Speaker to ever attempt 2 (failed) Impeachments, the first to attempt to Impeach the same President twice (and fail), the 1st House Speaker to attempt to Impeach a US President based on ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses, and the 1st House Speaker to argue that none of those things are needed to Impeach a President - the last person in Washington DC who should be allowed to lead nay type of investigation is house Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as she has absolutely ZERO credibility left.






Her mission is to distract from the foreknowledge of both herself and the FBI....Total show trial.
 

jillian

Princess
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
85,430
Reaction score
17,658
Points
2,220
Location
The Other Side of Paradise
The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold.

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

The Times story opened with this paragraph:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders in Congress from joining a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, saying their conduct suggested they could not be trusted to participate.

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

Now look at the following paragraph in the Times story:

In an unusual move, Ms. Pelosi announced that she was rejecting Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom amplified Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, joined their party's efforts to challenge President Biden's victory on Jan. 6 and have opposed efforts to investigate the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.

The language of the foregoing paragraph suggests that any Republican who opposes the re-election of Biden — or the election of some other Democrat — in 2024 will face the wrath of Pelosi. This paragraph also indicates the proposition that a Republican who raises questions about "election fraud" is, as night follows day, a liar.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

“both of whom amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud”

They just can’t help themselves from perpetuating the Big Lie that election fraud is a big lie. What we now know, without qualification, is that the fraud was real and widespread...we just don’t know yet how deep it was. Only audits will reveal that. But Trump’s claim is veritably NOT false.
The treasonous trumpscum voted against the bipartisan commission, nutter

maybe Donald’s Kevin shouldn’t have put two trump trolls on the panel. And lest you want to continue to lie, she was ok with the other three. But keep on spreading garbage
 
OP
T

The Purge

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Messages
17,541
Reaction score
7,049
Points
400
The treasonous trumpscum voted against the bipartisan commission, nutter

maybe Donald’s Kevin shouldn’t have put two trump trolls on the panel. And lest you want to continue to lie, she was ok with the other three. But keep on spreading garbage
Only TREASONOUS SCUM I see in this thread is YOU, COMMIE BASTARD!
 

wamose

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
10,142
Reaction score
11,143
Points
2,215
Location
Pennsylvania
Pelosi is extremely stupid for putting on another bogus controversy. But if the people actually fall for another of her scams, then it's them who are stupid and Pelosi is playing them like a fiddle.
 

Viktor

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
3,057
Reaction score
3,248
Points
1,930
Location
Southern California
The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold.

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

The Times story opened with this paragraph:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders in Congress from joining a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, saying their conduct suggested they could not be trusted to participate.

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

Now look at the following paragraph in the Times story:

In an unusual move, Ms. Pelosi announced that she was rejecting Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom amplified Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, joined their party's efforts to challenge President Biden's victory on Jan. 6 and have opposed efforts to investigate the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.

The language of the foregoing paragraph suggests that any Republican who opposes the re-election of Biden — or the election of some other Democrat — in 2024 will face the wrath of Pelosi. This paragraph also indicates the proposition that a Republican who raises questions about "election fraud" is, as night follows day, a liar.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

“both of whom amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud”

They just can’t help themselves from perpetuating the Big Lie that election fraud is a big lie. What we now know, without qualification, is that the fraud was real and widespread...we just don’t know yet how deep it was. Only audits will reveal that. But Trump’s claim is veritably NOT false.
We need to send Nancy to Alcoholics Anonymous.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$70.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top