Pelosi gets her puppets for partisan Jan. 6 commission

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,856
400
The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold.

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

The Times story opened with this paragraph:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders in Congress from joining a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, saying their conduct suggested they could not be trusted to participate.

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

Now look at the following paragraph in the Times story:

In an unusual move, Ms. Pelosi announced that she was rejecting Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom amplified Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, joined their party's efforts to challenge President Biden's victory on Jan. 6 and have opposed efforts to investigate the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.

The language of the foregoing paragraph suggests that any Republican who opposes the re-election of Biden — or the election of some other Democrat — in 2024 will face the wrath of Pelosi. This paragraph also indicates the proposition that a Republican who raises questions about "election fraud" is, as night follows day, a liar.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

“both of whom amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud”

They just can’t help themselves from perpetuating the Big Lie that election fraud is a big lie. What we now know, without qualification, is that the fraud was real and widespread...we just don’t know yet how deep it was. Only audits will reveal that. But Trump’s claim is veritably NOT false.
 
I guess Pelosi believes the Democrats have started a thousand year Reich.

or is too stupid to realize what comes around, goes around.

She kicks off Republicans for being 'too partisan', Republicans will be able to do the same thing once they are back in charge.

The 'Ice Queen' has created a slippery slope.
 
Again, Speaker Pelosi's partisan political theater is a waste of tax payer money, especially after the bipartisan Senate committee has released its investigation report on 1/6.

After Speaker Pelosi made history - for being the ONLY House Speaker to ever attempt 2 (failed) Impeachments, the first to attempt to Impeach the same President twice (and fail), the 1st House Speaker to attempt to Impeach a US President based on ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses, and the 1st House Speaker to argue that none of those things are needed to Impeach a President - the last person in Washington DC who should be allowed to lead nay type of investigation is house Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as she has absolutely ZERO credibility left.






 
Again, Speaker Pelosi's partisan political theater is a waste of tax payer money, especially after the bipartisan Senate committee has released its investigation report on 1/6.

After Speaker Pelosi made history - for being the ONLY House Speaker to ever attempt 2 (failed) Impeachments, the first to attempt to Impeach the same President twice (and fail), the 1st House Speaker to attempt to Impeach a US President based on ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses, and the 1st House Speaker to argue that none of those things are needed to Impeach a President - the last person in Washington DC who should be allowed to lead nay type of investigation is house Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as she has absolutely ZERO credibility left.






Her mission is to distract from the foreknowledge of both herself and the FBI....Total show trial.
 
The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold.

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

The Times story opened with this paragraph:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders in Congress from joining a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, saying their conduct suggested they could not be trusted to participate.

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

Now look at the following paragraph in the Times story:

In an unusual move, Ms. Pelosi announced that she was rejecting Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom amplified Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, joined their party's efforts to challenge President Biden's victory on Jan. 6 and have opposed efforts to investigate the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.

The language of the foregoing paragraph suggests that any Republican who opposes the re-election of Biden — or the election of some other Democrat — in 2024 will face the wrath of Pelosi. This paragraph also indicates the proposition that a Republican who raises questions about "election fraud" is, as night follows day, a liar.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

“both of whom amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud”

They just can’t help themselves from perpetuating the Big Lie that election fraud is a big lie. What we now know, without qualification, is that the fraud was real and widespread...we just don’t know yet how deep it was. Only audits will reveal that. But Trump’s claim is veritably NOT false.
The treasonous trumpscum voted against the bipartisan commission, nutter

maybe Donald’s Kevin shouldn’t have put two trump trolls on the panel. And lest you want to continue to lie, she was ok with the other three. But keep on spreading garbage
 
The treasonous trumpscum voted against the bipartisan commission, nutter

maybe Donald’s Kevin shouldn’t have put two trump trolls on the panel. And lest you want to continue to lie, she was ok with the other three. But keep on spreading garbage
OutofKitchen.jpg
 
The treasonous trumpscum voted against the bipartisan commission, nutter

maybe Donald’s Kevin shouldn’t have put two trump trolls on the panel. And lest you want to continue to lie, she was ok with the other three. But keep on spreading garbage
Only TREASONOUS SCUM I see in this thread is YOU, COMMIE BASTARD!
 
Pelosi is extremely stupid for putting on another bogus controversy. But if the people actually fall for another of her scams, then it's them who are stupid and Pelosi is playing them like a fiddle.
 
The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold.

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

The Times story opened with this paragraph:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders in Congress from joining a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, saying their conduct suggested they could not be trusted to participate.

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

Now look at the following paragraph in the Times story:

In an unusual move, Ms. Pelosi announced that she was rejecting Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom amplified Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, joined their party's efforts to challenge President Biden's victory on Jan. 6 and have opposed efforts to investigate the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.

The language of the foregoing paragraph suggests that any Republican who opposes the re-election of Biden — or the election of some other Democrat — in 2024 will face the wrath of Pelosi. This paragraph also indicates the proposition that a Republican who raises questions about "election fraud" is, as night follows day, a liar.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

“both of whom amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud”

They just can’t help themselves from perpetuating the Big Lie that election fraud is a big lie. What we now know, without qualification, is that the fraud was real and widespread...we just don’t know yet how deep it was. Only audits will reveal that. But Trump’s claim is veritably NOT false.
We need to send Nancy to Alcoholics Anonymous.
 
The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold.

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

The Times story opened with this paragraph:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders in Congress from joining a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, saying their conduct suggested they could not be trusted to participate.

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

Now look at the following paragraph in the Times story:

In an unusual move, Ms. Pelosi announced that she was rejecting Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom amplified Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, joined their party's efforts to challenge President Biden's victory on Jan. 6 and have opposed efforts to investigate the assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters.

The language of the foregoing paragraph suggests that any Republican who opposes the re-election of Biden — or the election of some other Democrat — in 2024 will face the wrath of Pelosi. This paragraph also indicates the proposition that a Republican who raises questions about "election fraud" is, as night follows day, a liar.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

“both of whom amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud”

They just can’t help themselves from perpetuating the Big Lie that election fraud is a big lie. What we now know, without qualification, is that the fraud was real and widespread...we just don’t know yet how deep it was. Only audits will reveal that. But Trump’s claim is veritably NOT false.
The evidence is everywhere. Steven Crowder did a great video about how many return addresses on ballots went to parking lots, abandoned buildings, or places that didn't actually exist. Democrooks being the sociopaths that they are will never acknowledge it though.
 

Forum List

Back
Top