Pelosi Appoints 2nd GOP Critic Of trump To Jan. 6 Committee

well - he's fighting tooth & nail to keep them archives from the select committee. hmmmmm....

& his flying monkeys in & outa congress are rather nervous about the phone records being provided to the select committee. & this little gem just surfaced:


Jan. 6th Committee finds Trump White House metadata on letter pressing Georgia on election​


Sat, December 4, 2021, 1:01 AM
Jan. 6th Committee finds Trump White House metadata on letter pressing Georgia on election

Fifth Amendment pleas, White House metadata redraw picture of January 6 investigation​


Sat, December 4, 2021, 1:24 AM


Rachel Maddow looks at pieces of the January 6th investigation puzzle in which former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark and Trumpworld lawyer John Eastman, who performed similar roles in pressuring states to overturn Donald Trump's election loss, have invoked their Fifth Amendment rights, and now we've learned that Clark's letter to Georgia carries White House metadata fingerprints.
Fifth Amendment pleas, White House metadata redraw picture of January 6 investigation






there IS a god in heaven.



if only donny would stfu & go hide away at mar a lago - & not resurface until he's put in cuffs & frogmarched... but alas, he just can't help himself.... calling into FOX - - - CONtinuing to push the big lie ... teasing endlessly about his possible run for prez in 2014 ... CONstantly putting out bs 'releases' from the 'desk of the 45th president' & just in the last few days, whining & bitching that nodody will take him up on his offer to debate the 'stolen election'.

c'mon - yer chosen one can't keep that orange pie hole of his shut for more than a day.
More bullshit from the promoter of bullshit.

Once again, no proof of anything you claim, just your lying word on it. If you were in the MSM, you would be the definition of false news. Continuing to lie and misrepresent amuything that has actually happened in favor of your fevered and demented take on it.

If you were even remotely intelligent, I would think that you could be Pelosi. Just as rabid an anti-truther as she is.
 
More bullshit from the promoter of bullshit.

Once again, no proof of anything you claim, just your lying word on it.

so donny ISN'T trying to invoke executive privilege over the archives surrounding jan 6? ... like I SAID:


Records Related to the Request for Presidential Records by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol requested records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under the Presidential Records Act. The letters on this page represent communications regarding the committee's request for presidential records.

& if his flying monkeys were nervous AF about them thar phone records - why would kevin mcspinless risk a charge of obstructing justice & threaten the phone companies?

LIKE I SAID:

McCarthy says GOP 'will not forget' if firms hand records to Jan. 6 panel​

BY REBECCA BEITSCH - 08/31/21 06:47 PM EDT
McCarthy says GOP 'will not forget' if firms hand records to Jan. 6 panel


If you were in the MSM, you would be the definition of false news.

'cept for the fact that i always back up what i claim.

unlike y-o-u.


Continuing to lie and misrepresent amuything that has actually happened in favor of your fevered and demented take on it.

If you were even remotely intelligent, I would think that you could be Pelosi. Just as rabid an anti-truther as she is.

the select committee stated that public hearings are forthcoming. with over 200 people that were questioned, it's looking like they have a treasure trove of intel to work with. i can't wait to hear it live & unedited, so the rw spin machine can't spin it. :thup:
 
so donny ISN'T trying to invoke executive privilege over the archives surrounding jan 6? ... like I SAID:


Records Related to the Request for Presidential Records by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol

The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol requested records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under the Presidential Records Act. The letters on this page represent communications regarding the committee's request for presidential records.

& if his flying monkeys were nervous AF about them thar phone records - why would kevin mcspinless risk a charge of obstructing justice & threaten the phone companies?

LIKE I SAID:

McCarthy says GOP 'will not forget' if firms hand records to Jan. 6 panel​

BY REBECCA BEITSCH - 08/31/21 06:47 PM EDT
McCarthy says GOP 'will not forget' if firms hand records to Jan. 6 panel




'cept for the fact that i always back up what i claim.

unlike y-o-u.




the select committee stated that public hearings are forthcoming. with over 200 people that were questioned, it's looking like they have a treasure trove of intel to work with. i can't wait to hear it live & unedited, so the rw spin machine can't spin it. :thup:
The only backup you provide is cherry picked liberal items that would appear to shore up your lies and imagination.

BTW, in a sense you appear to be doing exactly what you accuse Trump of doing. Lying and withholding any fact that you do not like.

If you spin any harder, you will fall over into that pile of left wing bullshit you are constantly consuming.

But then little doggies are known to eat shit, you are just advanced at doing so.
 
The only backup you provide is cherry picked liberal items

wrong. i always give credible UNBIASED links. you didn't even look to see what they were. lol ... that proves how poorly educated you are & that donny loves you long time. the ACTUAL department that houses the governmental archives is THE source to go to. & the hill is considered to be one of the least biased news sources.

nice try kitty cat ... but

facts are facts.



that would appear to shore up your lies and imagination.


lol ... if that soothes your little kitty butt - then you believe what you want.
 
wrong. i always give credible UNBIASED links. you didn't even look to see what they were. lol ... that proves how poorly educated you are & that donny loves you long time. the ACTUAL department that houses the governmental archives is THE source to go to. & the hill is considered to be one of the least biased news sources.

nice try kitty cat ... but

facts are facts.






lol ... if that soothes your little kitty butt - then you believe what you want.
You would not know a fact unless your left wing handlers told you it was one.

You consistently lie and pass on bigoted and incorrect statements without even having the ability or will to try and determine if they are true.

These are fact and you have already stated "facts are facts", unless you were also lying about that.

BTW, does that lava in your lamp represent your brain or just your random thought patterns?
 
You would not know a fact unless your left wing handlers told you it was one.

false.


You consistently lie and pass on bigoted and incorrect statements without even having the ability or will to try and determine if they are true.

false.


These are fact and you have already stated "facts are facts", unless you were also lying about that.

false.

BTW, does that lava in your lamp represent your brain or just your random thought patterns?

thanks for playing the ' kitty cat is just filling the page with the usual falsehoods & makes it look like a real reply, but failed miserably per his usual M.O. ' game.
 
thread still bookmarked & i will be back with more popcorn as the jan 6 committee chugs alongs & does its patriotic duty.
 
false.




false.




false.



thanks for playing the ' kitty cat is just filling the page with the usual falsehoods & makes it look like a real reply, but failed miserably per his usual M.O. ' game.
Reply to all of your false claims: false. But that is how you live little smelly doggy.

And once again you have failed to provide any support for any of your claims and tried to shift the discussion to anothe4r topic you know nothing about, the truth.
 

House probe will hold public hearings in 2022 detailing Jan. 6 Capitol riot and Trump White House response ‘in vivid color,’ Liz Cheney says​

PUBLISHED THU, DEC 2 202111:11 AM ESTUPDATED THU, DEC 2 20216:48 PM EST

multiple weeks of public hearings

House probe will hold public hearings in 2022 detailing Jan. 6 Capitol riot and Trump White House response 'in vivid color,' Liz Cheney says
More copyright infringement by the smelly little stupid doggy. You can't do your own research or even formulate ideas of your own, so you look for days on end in search of comments that you choose to tell yourself you believe.

Critical and original thought are foreign concepts to you, which is why you continue to resort to using emoji's to express yourself. And you don't even use those correctly. Further giving examples of why no one takes you seriously, which drives you even more insane.

You have crossed the line from pathetic to downright full-blown lefty.
 


well, let's review TWO of them there questions:
# 4 - answer:

at least one .... mark meadows :deal:

# 18 - answer:

House Jan. 6 panel has interviewed 250 people and is planning weeks of public hearings next year

House Jan. 6 panel has interviewed 250 people and is planning weeks of public hearings next year
:woohoo:

& the answer to #s 11/12:

Former DC National Guard official accuses generals of lying about Capitol riot

BY JORDAN WILLIAMS - 12/06/21 11:00 AM EST

Col. Earl Matthews, who at the time was the top attorney for then-D.C. National Guard commander Maj. Gen. William Walker, wrote a memo to the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack that was obtained by Politico.

In the memo, Matthews called Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, director of Army staff, “absolute and unmitigated liars” for their recollections of the Capitol riot.

Matthews said the men lied in their testimonies to Congress about how they responded to pleas for the D.C. Guard to be deployed on Jan. 6, what they told the Department of Defense’s Office of Inspector General in a report released last month and that the Army has a document about the riot that is “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist,” Politico reported.

Former DC National Guard official accuses generals of lying about Capitol riot

:dig:
 


well, let's review TWO of them there questions:


& the answer to #s 11/12:

Former DC National Guard official accuses generals of lying about Capitol riot

BY JORDAN WILLIAMS - 12/06/21 11:00 AM EST

Col. Earl Matthews, who at the time was the top attorney for then-D.C. National Guard commander Maj. Gen. William Walker, wrote a memo to the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack that was obtained by Politico.

In the memo, Matthews called Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, director of Army staff, “absolute and unmitigated liars” for their recollections of the Capitol riot.

Matthews said the men lied in their testimonies to Congress about how they responded to pleas for the D.C. Guard to be deployed on Jan. 6, what they told the Department of Defense’s Office of Inspector General in a report released last month and that the Army has a document about the riot that is “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist,” Politico reported.

Former DC National Guard official accuses generals of lying about Capitol riot

:dig:

Still violating copy right law in your pathetic search and effort to make what you say seem true.

Pure leftist tactic, doggy. And about as true and factual as you can be, which is to say not at all.

It took you a couple of days to come up with it, too. Even more pathetic than usual.

You indeed are a leftists Plaything.
 
Rally Planner With Ties to G.O.P. Is Cooperating in Jan. 6 Inquiry

Ali Alexander, who helped organize the gathering that drew Trump supporters to Washington on Jan. 6, could shed light on efforts by the former president and his allies to overturn the election.

By Alan Feuer and Luke Broadwater
Dec. 8, 2021

Ali Alexander, a prominent organizer of Stop the Steal rallies with ties to far-right members of Congress who sought to invalidate the 2020 election results, is cooperating with the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, pledging to deliver a trove of documents that could shed light on the activities that preceded the attack.
Rally Planner With Ties to G.O.P. Is Cooperating in Jan. 6 Inquiry

🧭⏱️⏰🕰️⏳⏲️
 
Rally Planner With Ties to G.O.P. Is Cooperating in Jan. 6 Inquiry

Ali Alexander, who helped organize the gathering that drew Trump supporters to Washington on Jan. 6, could shed light on efforts by the former president and his allies to overturn the election.

By Alan Feuer and Luke Broadwater
Dec. 8, 2021

Ali Alexander, a prominent organizer of Stop the Steal rallies with ties to far-right members of Congress who sought to invalidate the 2020 election results, is cooperating with the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, pledging to deliver a trove of documents that could shed light on the activities that preceded the attack.
Rally Planner With Ties to G.O.P. Is Cooperating in Jan. 6 Inquiry

🧭⏱️⏰🕰️⏳⏲️
Again with the copyright infringement! You really are too stupid to learn what you are doing is against the law.

You are just a plaything for the lying left without the power of independent thought. As is shown in all of your posts little doggy.
 
Again with the copyright infringement!

ummmm .... nooooooooooooooooo...........

What is publication?
Publication has a technical meaning in copyright law. According to the statute, “Publication is the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending. The offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display constitutes publication. A public performance or display of a work does not of itself constitute publication.” Generally, publication occurs on the date on which copies of the work are first made available to the public. For further information see Circular 1, Copyright Basics, section “Publication”.
Definitions (FAQ) | U.S. Copyright Office

not to mention, i always give full sourcing which is what is required - lest ye
[ read:
you ] are accused of making shit up.

Books, research articles, and news articles provide different types of information and, especially, different amounts of detail. Which source you need depends on what you want to do with it. You may be looking for a brief overview, a quick fact, or an in-depth analysis. Until you know what you need, it can be difficult to decide where to look for the information.
Research Guides: Research: From selecting a topic to writing the bibliography: What Type of Source Do I Need?

There are several reasons why it is important to cite your sources properly.

  • It is important to give credit to the person or group who discovered or created that information. ( did )
  • It allows your reader to find the source later if she wants to read it herself. (did )
  • Citing experts gives credibility to the argument of your paper.
  • ( always do )
  • Proper citing indicates that you did a thorough job researching your topic. ( as always )

You really are too stupid to learn what you are doing is against the law.

lol... report me then ...
 

Court rejects Trump's efforts to keep records from 1/6 panel

A federal appeals court has ruled against an effort by former President Donald Trump to shield documents from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol
By ERIC TUCKER and ZEKE MILLER Associated Press
December 10, 2021, 12:11 AM
• 5 min read

“On the record before us, former President Trump has provided no basis for this court to override President Biden’s judgment and the agreement and accommodations worked out between the Political Branches over these documents,” the opinion states.
Court rejects Trump's efforts to keep records from 1/6 panel

 
ummmm .... nooooooooooooooooo...........

What is publication?
Publication has a technical meaning in copyright law. According to the statute, “Publication is the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending. The offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display constitutes publication. A public performance or display of a work does not of itself constitute publication.” Generally, publication occurs on the date on which copies of the work are first made available to the public. For further information see Circular 1, Copyright Basics, section “Publication”.
Definitions (FAQ) | U.S. Copyright Office

not to mention, i always give full sourcing which is what is required - lest ye
[ read:
you ] are accused of making shit up.

Books, research articles, and news articles provide different types of information and, especially, different amounts of detail. Which source you need depends on what you want to do with it. You may be looking for a brief overview, a quick fact, or an in-depth analysis. Until you know what you need, it can be difficult to decide where to look for the information.
Research Guides: Research: From selecting a topic to writing the bibliography: What Type of Source Do I Need?

There are several reasons why it is important to cite your sources properly.

  • It is important to give credit to the person or group who discovered or created that information. ( did )
  • It allows your reader to find the source later if she wants to read it herself. (did )
  • Citing experts gives credibility to the argument of your paper.
  • ( always do )
  • Proper citing indicates that you did a thorough job researching your topic. ( as always )



lol... report me then ...
You lie again. To avoid copyright infringement, you must cite more than just the alleged author, you must cite the publication, which you constantly avoid doing. Why? Using the Onion or Babylon Bee as your primary sources, or perhaps you are old school and use the National Enquirer. More likely just using memos from your masters to promote the hate that you do.

You truly are the plaything of the mentally deficient and you fit right in with them.
 
You lie again.

wrong.

To avoid copyright infringement, you must cite more than just the alleged author, you must cite the publication, which you constantly avoid doing.

wrong.



why what? that you're wrong?

it's because you're wrong.

Using the Onion or Babylon Bee as your primary sources,

lol ... that would need to be in the satire section of the forum.

oh ya...


seems you're wrong.

or perhaps you are old school and use the National Enquirer.

that would be donny's M.O. he & david<snicker>pecker are long time buds.

&...........................................

you're still wrong.


More likely just using memos from your masters to promote the hate that you do.

you're free to cite sources of your own.

LOL!

You truly are the plaything of the mentally deficient and you fit right in with them.


























































1639156114865.png
 
wrong.



wrong.




why what? that you're wrong?

it's because you're wrong.



lol ... that would need to be in the satire section of the forum.

oh ya...


seems you're wrong.



that would be donny's M.O. he & david<snicker>pecker are long time buds.

&...........................................

you're still wrong.




you're free to cite sources of your own.

LOL!




























































View attachment 574080
You sure go to extremes to claim that you are correct, yet never give any reason except that you say so to back your claim.

Nothing that I have stated is incorrect, especially that you go off the rails with zero proof to prove how correct you are.

Just to attempt to educate a little, even though that is a lost cause, you cite sources, which you don't ever do, so that your claims can be sourced and verified by others. You know, to prove that you accurately quoted them and did not add or omit anything or even make them up completely. And then you are only citing opinions that just happen to agree with your hate. And then you go on a rant, without any backup, demanding that you as a known liar be believed just because you say so. You claim to offer facts (as they appear only to you) and rage when you get replied to in opinions that differ from your own. Proof of your Marxist tendencies and hatred of free thought.

You are a sick little puppy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top