Pedophilia Deserves Civil Rights, Says New York Times’ Op-ed

[Asclepias]

Its not hypocrisy. If we were talking apples to apples I could see your point.

It is apples to apples. Either we can discriminate or we can't. Any law that says "only sometimes you can't discriminate" is unconstitutional as it affords special protections to SOME people.

For possibly the first time in your posting history, be honest and admit the truth.

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

I didnt say they should have to go to jail. I said they shouldn't whine about being ostracized and not protected by the law.

As long as your desire to rob a bank is not your only mode of sexually gratification and there are no children involved, I dont see the problem.

 

[koshergrl]

Its not hypocrisy. If we were talking apples to apples I could see your point.

It is apples to apples. Either we can discriminate or we can't. Any law that says "only sometimes you can't discriminate" is unconstitutional as it affords special protections to SOME people.

For possibly the first time in your posting history, be honest and admit the truth.

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

Yeah, anyone in their right mind knows that it's a small step between fantasizing about sex with a child, and actually having sex with a child.

Pukes.

 

[koshergrl]

And wanna-be thugs are also distasteful retards that I don't want anywhere near me or my children.

 

[novasteve]

Its not hypocrisy. If we were talking apples to apples I could see your point.

It is apples to apples. Either we can discriminate or we can't. Any law that says "only sometimes you can't discriminate" is unconstitutional as it affords special protections to SOME people.

For possibly the first time in your posting history, be honest and admit the truth.

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

Are you predispositioned to rob banks?

 

[Asclepias]

Only if the blacks admitted they wanted to commit acts of violence. Your logic doesn't fly.

But that's nothing new.

You are dumb

Being a pedo is not a crime. Acting on those urges is.

Have you ever thought "I'd like to kill so and so?" Of course you have, everyone has, unless you actually attempt to act on those thoughts, no harm no foul.

Thinking you would like to kill is not the same as having thoughts associated to the strongest urge known to man.

I want to rob a bank.

Did you experience a sexual thrill and was a child a potential victim of your crime where they could be harmed physically or emotionally through direct or indirect sexual contact?

 

[Slyhunter]

So you wouldn't blame me if I felt the same way about homo's then? I shouldn't be forced to work with one if I don't want to or make a cake for them either for that matter.

Why would I blame you? I'd think you were dumb since it didn't affect you or a child. Maybe that's why there is a law against it and not for pedos.

But we are talking about men who were born with an attraction to having sex with children but who have not actually even tried to have sex with a child, because they know it's wrong or whatever. IE men who have never harmed a child who simply want help in keeping it that way.

If it's ok for you to not work with someone, who has never hurt a child, that is a pedophile, then it should be ok for me to not work with someone, who has never hurt anyone, that is a homo.

Gay people dont hurt children by following their sexual urges. Pedos do.

Necrophiliacs don't hurt the living.

But they are still sick ******* degenerates

So are homo's.

 

[koshergrl]

Besides, nobody said pedos belonged in jail for fantasizing about raping infants.

All we said is that it's right for society to censure them. They certainly shouldn't be encouraged.

 

[koshergrl]

Why would I blame you? I'd think you were dumb since it didn't affect you or a child. Maybe that's why there is a law against it and not for pedos.

But we are talking about men who were born with an attraction to having sex with children but who have not actually even tried to have sex with a child, because they know it's wrong or whatever. IE men who have never harmed a child who simply want help in keeping it that way.

If it's ok for you to not work with someone, who has never hurt a child, that is a pedophile, then it should be ok for me to not work with someone, who has never hurt anyone, that is a homo.

Gay people dont hurt children by following their sexual urges. Pedos do.

Necrophiliacs don't hurt the living.

But they are still sick ******* degenerates

So are homo's.

So true.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Besides, nobody said pedos belonged in jail for fantasizing about raping infants.

All we said is that it's right for society to censure them. They certainly shouldn't be encouraged.

Personally I think they should be encouraged to identify themselves, so that we can treat them via chemical castration.

 

[Slyhunter]

It is apples to apples. Either we can discriminate or we can't. Any law that says "only sometimes you can't discriminate" is unconstitutional as it affords special protections to SOME people.

For possibly the first time in your posting history, be honest and admit the truth.

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

I didnt say they should have to go to jail. I said they shouldn't whine about being ostracized and not protected by the law.

As long as your desire to rob a bank is not your only mode of sexually gratification and there are no children involved, I dont see the problem.

well damn why are we arguing in circles then? All the op is saying that pedophiles shouldn't be prosecuted for admitting they want to have sex with children as long as they have not actually tried to have sex with children.

Second argument; do you have the right to refuse to work with one. Only if I can refuse to work with a homo.

 

[Slyhunter]

It is apples to apples. Either we can discriminate or we can't. Any law that says "only sometimes you can't discriminate" is unconstitutional as it affords special protections to SOME people.

For possibly the first time in your posting history, be honest and admit the truth.

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

Yeah, anyone in their right mind knows that it's a small step between fantasizing about sex with a child, and actually having sex with a child.

Pukes.

Bigger or smaller than my fantasy of robbing banks?

 

[koshergrl]

Besides, nobody said pedos belonged in jail for fantasizing about raping infants.

All we said is that it's right for society to censure them. They certainly shouldn't be encouraged.

Personally I think they should be encouraged to identify themselves, so that we can treat them via chemical castration.

It isn't an effective treatment. It just stops them from getting woodies. They still fantasize about victimizing children.

 

[Slyhunter]

It is apples to apples. Either we can discriminate or we can't. Any law that says "only sometimes you can't discriminate" is unconstitutional as it affords special protections to SOME people.

For possibly the first time in your posting history, be honest and admit the truth.

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

Are you predispositioned to rob banks?

No, just poor.

 

[koshergrl]

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

Yeah, anyone in their right mind knows that it's a small step between fantasizing about sex with a child, and actually having sex with a child.

Pukes.

Bigger or smaller than my fantasy of robbing banks?

My guess would be that you are indeed a felon. If not now, you will be.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Besides, nobody said pedos belonged in jail for fantasizing about raping infants.

All we said is that it's right for society to censure them. They certainly shouldn't be encouraged.

Personally I think they should be encouraged to identify themselves, so that we can treat them via chemical castration.

It isn't an effective treatment. It just stops them from getting woodies. They still fantasize about victimizing children.

I don't care what they fantasize about as long as no actual children are harmed.

 

[Asclepias]

Bullshit. Everyone discriminates. Some forms are legal and others are not. You discriminate when you choose to speak to some people and not to others. A person that is a pedo is potentially dangerous specifically to children. A Black person is not specifically dangerous to anyone. Its not apples to apples.

I think you are getting confused. If I didn't want to serve gay people for instance, I wouldn't but I would not whine about the consequences of my actions either.

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

I didnt say they should have to go to jail. I said they shouldn't whine about being ostracized and not protected by the law.

As long as your desire to rob a bank is not your only mode of sexually gratification and there are no children involved, I dont see the problem.

well damn why are we arguing in circles then? All the op is saying that pedophiles shouldn't be prosecuted for admitting they want to have sex with children as long as they have not actually tried to have sex with children.

Second argument; do you have the right to refuse to work with one. Only if I can refuse to work with a homo.

Are you sure the op didnt mean persecuted? Of course. Its illegal to prosecute someone without a crime being committed. That doesn't mean I have to work with them or tolerate them in my presence.

 

[Slyhunter]

Only if the blacks admitted they wanted to commit acts of violence. Your logic doesn't fly.

But that's nothing new.

You are dumb

Being a pedo is not a crime. Acting on those urges is.

Have you ever thought "I'd like to kill so and so?" Of course you have, everyone has, unless you actually attempt to act on those thoughts, no harm no foul.

Thinking you would like to kill is not the same as having thoughts associated to the strongest urge known to man.

I want to rob a bank.

Did you experience a sexual thrill and was a child a potential victim of your crime where they could be harmed physically or emotionally through direct or indirect sexual contact?

eeech.
My father was a pedophile that got away with having sex with my sister but I didn't know it until I was in my 20's. He's in jail now for having sex with his second daughter. He was given a second chance and he screwed it up and did it again so this time he was busted and imprisoned.

I understand the desire. I don't understand the betrayal of your own daughter to express that desire.

Like I said I'm bi-polar. I know anxiety attacks. I know manic episodes. I know how your emotions can overwhelm you. But you don't have to let them control your actions.

I don't blame my father for having the desire. I do blame him for being his daughters protagonist instead of her protector.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Statistics has proven that a black person is more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. So I'd be justified in discriminating against blacks for the same reason you discriminate against pedophiles who haven't, as of yet, harmed anyone.

No you wouldnt. Your logic is not making sense. A pedo is confessing he has a predisposition to harm a child. There is no guessing about it. Since 100% of all blacks do not commit violent crime you are way off base in your comparison.

No, he is fantasizing about having sex with a child. It is your opinion that it is harming one, that is another argument. It is illegal and if he actual did it he should go to jail, but as long as he's fantasizing about it why should he have to go to jail?

I fantasize about robbing banks everytime I do my budget. So should I go to jail for bank robbery even though I've never robbed a bank?

I didnt say they should have to go to jail. I said they shouldn't whine about being ostracized and not protected by the law.

As long as your desire to rob a bank is not your only mode of sexually gratification and there are no children involved, I dont see the problem.

well damn why are we arguing in circles then? All the op is saying that pedophiles shouldn't be prosecuted for admitting they want to have sex with children as long as they have not actually tried to have sex with children.

Second argument; do you have the right to refuse to work with one. Only if I can refuse to work with a homo.

Are you sure the op didnt mean persecuted? Of course. Its illegal to prosecute someone without a crime being committed. That doesn't mean I have to work with them or tolerate them in my presence.

Unless they're black right hypocrite?

 

[Silhouette]

It isn't an effective treatment. It just stops them from getting woodies. They still fantasize about victimizing children.

"Victimizing" is such a strong word. I think the politically-correct phrase that is NAMBLA-approved is "teaching children the joys of physical love".

Here's a photo from a gay pride parade a few years back...

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Only if the blacks admitted they wanted to commit acts of violence. Your logic doesn't fly.

But that's nothing new.

You are dumb

Being a pedo is not a crime. Acting on those urges is.

Have you ever thought "I'd like to kill so and so?" Of course you have, everyone has, unless you actually attempt to act on those thoughts, no harm no foul.

Thinking you would like to kill is not the same as having thoughts associated to the strongest urge known to man.

I want to rob a bank.

Did you experience a sexual thrill and was a child a potential victim of your crime where they could be harmed physically or emotionally through direct or indirect sexual contact?

eeech.
My father was a pedophile that got away with having sex with my sister but I didn't know it until I was in my 20's. He's in jail now for having sex with his second daughter. He was given a second chance and he screwed it up and did it again so this time he was busted and imprisoned.

I understand the desire. I don't understand the betrayal of your own daughter to express that desire.

Like I said I'm bi-polar. I know anxiety attacks. I know manic episodes. I know how your emotions can overwhelm you. But you don't have to let them control your actions.

I don't blame my father for having the desire. I do blame him for being his daughters protagonist instead of her protector.

I blame you for not killing your father. Seriously.