Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #121
The BBC article debunked this, Perhaps you have a picture ?You’re the one talking
about their underwear.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The BBC article debunked this, Perhaps you have a picture ?You’re the one talking
about their underwear.
Were you ? Im not the one spreading lies about it. You are the spawn of alex jones.
I lack the time for your nonsense. You believe that Trump won in 2020. I could read Blake,Shelley and Larkin in that time. Your views are those of a deluded half wit and not worthy of my time.So Tommy, just what do you find funny about the fact that our government acknowledged 17 years ago a fatal flaw in a broken election system warning of the VERY PROBLEMS which now became the TOOLS used to steal the reelection of a president two years ago?
A funny is a pussy's way out. I notice you didn't actually refute any of that article which means that you CAN'T refute any of the Carter-Baker's seven points on fraud.
You mean you CAN'T refute documented proof this is in print from the government's OWN STUDY.I lack the time for your nonsense.
All the evidence suggests that Trump would have easily won had election laws been followed, not doing so caused him to lose by only about 46,000 votes in three swing states combined, found at 4AM after everyone else had been sent home. So yeah, don't you think certifiable and verifiable elections are important? What happened to that love of democracy you profess to have?You believe that Trump won in 2020.
Thanks for the cop out and recapitulation. Admit it, after all the name calling is over, you are really just mad because you haven't a shred of proof to present showing that Biden legally won and all of the evidence suggests otherwise.Your views are those of a deluded half wit and not worthy of my time.
we can count on this self rightous turd to explain what the truth is about everything...the failed liberal truth anyhow![]()
Paul Pelosi: Examining the false claims about the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband
False claims about the violent attack have gone viral in the days following the incident.www.bbc.co.uk
Adults will find many of the lurid claims in threads on this site. The right has a huge misinformation machine that is given oxygen by idiots like MTG.
Its very distasteful.
what does Trump have to do with Paul's sex life? Geez man.....I supose this adherence to conspiracy theories is an act of faith and explains stuff like support for trump and Q. All that shit.
You have no evidence so choose to attack your betters for pointing out your idiocy.
There really should be therapy to help you cope ith your imaginary demons.
Tommy, EVERYONE is your better.You have no evidence so choose to attack your betters
Tommy, just whom are you addressing? Are you talking out-loud to yourself?There really should be therapy to help you cope ith your imaginary demons.
What does Mr Pelosi have to do with anything at all ?what does Trump have to do with Paul's sex life? Geez man.....
um...he's the topic of this thread.....What does Mr Pelosi have to do with anything at all ?
What does Mr Pelosi have to do with anything at all ?
He was attacked by an extreme right winger who was looking for his wife.His hammer fight is being blamed on conservatives, so conservatives have a right to propose alternative theories of what might have gone down.
I have no evidence to actually support that....just some propagandist making the claimHe was attacked by an extreme right winger who was looking for his wife.
You should sympathise with an old man and condemn his attacker.
You would if you had any decency.
What does Mr Pelosi have to do with anything at all ?
He was attacked by an extreme right winger