I'm not disputing ANY claim, dummy, because all the evidence is being WITHHELD. I'm just pointing out that rather than just present the facts, which should STRENGTHEN their case against DePage, not weaken it, your article is running cover for the Pelosis instead. At this point, the public doesn't know enough to decide anything.
Really incredible how the government has made a total circus out of all journalism now, then they get their panties in a wad when people assume the worst! Until I'm presented with the 911 audio and the body cam footage (as well as any in-house security video), I must assume the worst, that maybe this Depape guy was a sex toy illegal being held criminally against his will by a gay Paul and used the hammer to try to fend off his attacks while trying to escape while Nancy was out shopping for more B&D gear!
Why not? When the media and government cover everything up, I must assume there is some untoward story there they are trying to protect!