Patriots Super Bowl ring

Yeah, and 'failing to cooperate' in this case means he refused to plead guilty.

The NFL had ZERO evidence to warrant invading Brady's privacy and searching his ******* phone.

It is none of their god damned business unless they can show some kind of cause.

Goodell is simply on a power trip and needs to be replaced.
you're funny :p

seriously though, back to topic- cheaters getting their just desserts

So where is your PROOF, dude?

You do know how it is supposed to work right? Due fairness does not mean punishing a payer with a four game suspensionnd loss of a seven figure income when you have ZERO proof, then have the audacity to act as the arbitrator of your own fucked up decision.

That is Gulag shit, not American fair play.

Goodell needs to be fired ASAP.

Not a court of law....it is the NFL

Oh, and did you hear the trial has been moved to New York....could the judge be a Jets fan? You know one of the teams that has been cheated out of a Division title for many years.

Can't wait to see Shady explain why he destroyed his cell phone....

He doesn't have to explain why he destroyed his phone. He has to prove the NFL violated the CBA. He has a pretty good case.
I can't say this enough, the fact the Colts balls were underinflated means there was no tampering. It is that simple
 
Not a court of law....it is the NFL

Oh, and did you hear the trial has been moved to New York....could the judge be a Jets fan? You know one of the teams that has been cheated out of a Division title for many years.

Can't wait to see Shady explain why he destroyed his cell phone....


So you only expect fairness in a court of law, but not elsewhere?

So how do you like being a thrall? :D

what's a thrail?

Maybe a super secret play by the Putriots?


No, it is the mindset of most libtards.
Hey, Hey I am on your side in this argument.

'Putriots' does not equal 'my side', lol. I am a Patriots fan, so I am not sure what you mean.

It's all in good fun anyway.
 
I can't say this enough, the fact the Colts balls were underinflated means there was no tampering. It is that simple

Wait, hold on a minute.....

Are we sure that the Colts actually have any balls?

:D
 
Yeah, and 'failing to cooperate' in this case means he refused to plead guilty.

The NFL had ZERO evidence to warrant invading Brady's privacy and searching his ******* phone.

It is none of their god damned business unless they can show some kind of cause.

Goodell is simply on a power trip and needs to be replaced.
you're funny :p

seriously though, back to topic- cheaters getting their just desserts

So where is your PROOF, dude?

You do know how it is supposed to work right? Due fairness does not mean punishing a payer with a four game suspensionnd loss of a seven figure income when you have ZERO proof, then have the audacity to act as the arbitrator of your own fucked up decision.

That is Gulag shit, not American fair play.

Goodell needs to be fired ASAP.

Not a court of law....it is the NFL

Oh, and did you hear the trial has been moved to New York....could the judge be a Jets fan? You know one of the teams that has been cheated out of a Division title for many years.

Can't wait to see Shady explain why he destroyed his cell phone....

He doesn't have to explain why he destroyed his phone. He has to prove the NFL violated the CBA. He has a pretty good case.
I can't say this enough, the fact the Colts balls were underinflated means there was no tampering. It is that simple

At this point Brady has to prove the NFL violated the CBA, they are not going to retry the accusations.
 
cheatriot fan bois still falling over themselves to regurgitate "yabut" statements. Sad :(
this is what they see>>>>
Brady+Cap.png



This is how Brady really is>>>
Tom-Brady.gif
exactly!!!
 
Face it. No response about the Colts balls being underinflated. No problem with Aaron Rogers admitting to overinflating over the limit. No problem with Jerry Rice putting stickum on his gloves (highly illegal). It is a conspiracy. The proof could not be plainer
 
Lol, funny thread, but anyone who thinks that Brady got a fair shake in this process is not paying attention. Goodell arbitrates his own decision? Seriously? And this is one of the heavier punishments for an offense that demonstrably had no affect on the game (since the Pats then blew out the Colts with properly inflated balls) and there was never any real evidence that showed Brady or anyone else did anything in violation of the rules.

The weather and 30 minutes of play could have lowered the balls PSI all by itself if it was aired up to minimum pressures.

If this is such a big deal, why didn't the ******* refs keep an eye on the footballs instead of signing them over to the home teams equipment guys? Why aren't the refs taking any of the blame if this is such a big deal?

It is all nothing but bullshit.
Brady had a chance to defend himself, he choked.

How did he fail to defend himself? He pointed out that the investigation pointed out it did not have compelling evidence, so why is he being punished? Because someone has to suffer because the Patriots are so damned good?

Please.
He did not cooperate that is how he failed to defend himself.

How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:
 
Brady had a chance to defend himself, he choked.

How did he fail to defend himself? He pointed out that the investigation pointed out it did not have compelling evidence, so why is he being punished? Because someone has to suffer because the Patriots are so damned good?

Please.
He did not cooperate that is how he failed to defend himself.

How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:
Please Mr. Know it all show us the evidence that Brady did it. There is none
 
Yeah, and 'failing to cooperate' in this case means he refused to plead guilty.

The NFL had ZERO evidence to warrant invading Brady's privacy and searching his ******* phone.

It is none of their god damned business unless they can show some kind of cause.

Goodell is simply on a power trip and needs to be replaced.
you're funny :p

seriously though, back to topic- cheaters getting their just desserts

So where is your PROOF, dude?

You do know how it is supposed to work right? Due fairness does not mean punishing a payer with a four game suspensionnd loss of a seven figure income when you have ZERO proof, then have the audacity to act as the arbitrator of your own fucked up decision.

That is Gulag shit, not American fair play.

Goodell needs to be fired ASAP.

Not a court of law....it is the NFL

Oh, and did you hear the trial has been moved to New York....could the judge be a Jets fan? You know one of the teams that has been cheated out of a Division title for many years.

Can't wait to see Shady explain why he destroyed his cell phone....

He doesn't have to explain why he destroyed his phone. He has to prove the NFL violated the CBA. He has a pretty good case.
I can't say this enough, the fact the Colts balls were underinflated means there was no tampering. It is that simple

hate to break the news to you cheatriot worshipper,,but the cheats have been caught cheating many times over the years.the ravens alerted the colts to the deflated footballs.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Face it. No response about the Colts balls being underinflated. No problem with Aaron Rogers admitting to overinflating over the limit. No problem with Jerry Rice putting stickum on his gloves (highly illegal). It is a conspiracy. The proof could not be plainer
we have already addressed and debunked all that grasping at straws argument throughout this thread you cheatriot apologists come up with when losing this debate,I suggest you go through this entire thread and read through all the posts before bringing up an old lame argument that has been addressed and countered on here.:biggrin:

you guys can never come up with something new after being taken to school on this,its either the same old blah,blah,blah. never fails everytime in desperation after getting checkmated,you all always retreat to the old debunked there is no evidence laughable lie,or the old debunked jerry rice and Aaron Rogers nonsense everytime.:biggrin:

yeah and hillary clinton after she destroyed documents pertaining to vince foster when investigaters were in the white house investigating the vince foster murder,there was no evidence of a coverup by her either.you brady worshippers are hilarious in your rants and grasping at straws in defeat.:D:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::muahaha::haha::haha::haha::haha:
 
Last edited:
How did he fail to defend himself? He pointed out that the investigation pointed out it did not have compelling evidence, so why is he being punished? Because someone has to suffer because the Patriots are so damned good?

Please.
He did not cooperate that is how he failed to defend himself.

How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:
Please Mr. Know it all show us the evidence that Brady did it. There is none


I smell a sock here guys.:biggrin:

Notice how he came out of the woodwork out of nowhere? ahh the cheatriot worshippers getting desperate as always.:biggrin:
 
Brady had a chance to defend himself, he choked.

How did he fail to defend himself? He pointed out that the investigation pointed out it did not have compelling evidence, so why is he being punished? Because someone has to suffer because the Patriots are so damned good?

Please.
He did not cooperate that is how he failed to defend himself.

How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:

I don't care who the team is, it could be Wilson or Romo. Violating the CBA is wrong. If you want it written in the rules write it in, otherwise this should not be an issue.

Would you feel different if it were any other team or QB?
 
15th post
He did not cooperate that is how he failed to defend himself.

How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:
Please Mr. Know it all show us the evidence that Brady did it. There is none


I smell a sock here guys.:biggrin:

Notice how he came out of the woodwork out of nowhere? ahh the cheatriot worshippers getting desperate as always.:biggrin:
Who do you think is a sock? Me? If you do, you are sadly mistaken.
 
How did he fail to defend himself? He pointed out that the investigation pointed out it did not have compelling evidence, so why is he being punished? Because someone has to suffer because the Patriots are so damned good?

Please.
He did not cooperate that is how he failed to defend himself.

How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:

I don't care who the team is, it could be Wilson or Romo. Violating the CBA is wrong. If you want it written in the rules write it in, otherwise this should not be an issue.

Would you feel different if it were any other team or QB?
Of course they wouldn't. They hate us cause they ain't us
 
He did not cooperate that is how he failed to defend himself.

How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:

I don't care who the team is, it could be Wilson or Romo. Violating the CBA is wrong. If you want it written in the rules write it in, otherwise this should not be an issue.

Would you feel different if it were any other team or QB?
Of course they wouldn't. They hate us cause they ain't us

I'm not a Patriots fan, I rate them with Seattle and Dallas as my least liked teams.

Fair is fair however and the NFL has violated the CBA. I think Brady knew the air pressure was let out and I think it was by his direction, however there is no direct proof and they punishment is a violation of the CBA.

Rules are rules.
 
How did he fail to cooperate exactly?

Patriots apos Tom Brady defends himself criticizes NFL in Facebook post - LA Times

I know this is his own words, ut he explains how he did cooperate:

"To try and reconcile the record and fully cooperate with the investigation after I was disciplined in May, we turned over detailed pages of cell phone records and all of the emails that Mr. Wells requested. We even contacted the phone company to see if there was any possible way we could retrieve any/all of the actual text messages from my old phone. In short, we exhausted every possibility to give the NFL everything we could and offered to go thru the identity for every text and phone call during the relevant time. Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing."
So the guy who did got suspended cries he did no wrong. If this were not Brady would you be saying the same thing?

No.If it was another quarterback he did not worship,then he knows just as well as we do he would not be defending him like all cheatriot apologists do.if this was someone else,the cheatriot apologists would be all over this..you think they would be defending Peyton Manning if this was HIM? I dont think so.excellent point.:clap:

I don't care who the team is, it could be Wilson or Romo. Violating the CBA is wrong. If you want it written in the rules write it in, otherwise this should not be an issue.

Would you feel different if it were any other team or QB?
Of course they wouldn't. They hate us cause they ain't us

I'm not a Patriots fan, I rate them with Seattle and Dallas as my least liked teams.

Fair is fair however and the NFL has violated the CBA. I think Brady knew the air pressure was let out and I think it was by his direction, however there is no direct proof and they punishment is a violation of the CBA.

Rules are rules.
What rule(s) are you referring to?
 
Back
Top Bottom