HUGGY
I Post Because I Care
What's amusing is that you think you know Brady is a cheater and a liar when he hasn't demonstrated either tendency in a very long public career.
Brady is most always a class act. One of the classiest guys in the sport, IMO.![]()
Me thinks someone needs to change her thong. Getting a little damp in here.
What I said was truth. Brady is a class act. Just because you don't like him doesn't mean my statement is untrue. Everyone who has worked with Brady likes him on a personal level from everything I've read. He's just a nice guy. Sorry, that he isn't the monster you are trying to make him out to be over a deflated football.
When did I EVER say I didn't like Brady or think him a MONSTER? I just don't believe he was the MVP in the last Super Bowl. That honor should have gone to Butler. HE played lights out the entire game. If the Hawks had scored on that last drive, which by any reasonable guess they should have, Brady would not have been the MVP. If Butler hadn't made the most outstanding defensive play in Super Bowl history Brady's second half drives would have been described as what they were.... against a crippled Seahawk defensive secondary. He is a good QB...just not the BEST QB. that would be Aaron Rodgers. Then I would take Russell Wilson. Brady has a great history but your history doesn't count in football games.
NE SHOULD have won the game. Not because they are better than Seattle, but because as beat up as the Hawks were any good team would have had the advantage against the Seahawks on that day.
To repeat I don't rag on Brady. As far as deflate-gate is concerned...he knew damned well the balls were under inflated. It gave him a slight advantage. He lied about knowing that and now he will be punished. No big deal but all this boo hooing for Tom Brady is ridiculous.
Let me ask you this, Huggy...
Let's say you're a GM and you've got a choice between taking Tom Brady after his first year as a starting QB...or Russell Wilson after his first year as a starting QB. Do you still pick Wilson over Brady?
Too vague. Not enough information. If I had Green Bay and Rodgers went down I would pick Wilson before Brady in a heartbeat. If I had Indy and Luck was less than lucky I would probably take Brady over Wilson as the Colts are a pocket style offense. I would take many QBs over Brady as a pocket QB in certain situations. Breeze, J. Elway, The guy in Atlanta, There are only a small handfull of QBs in the NFL that do what Wilson does.. Rodgers, The Panthers QB..that may be it. Of those Wilson is clearly the best. Rodgers can throw on the run very well but nobody extends plays like Wilson..nobody. Rodgers is recognized as better than Wilson by many pundits but I believe that is because he throws very well in the pocket..much better than Wilson.
Brady and Belichick are very good at finding weaknesses in other teams defenses and exploiting them. I would have to say that the schemes NE deploys has as much or more to do with Brady's success as Tom's ability. It would be very hard to replace either Brady or Wilson. Coaching a new QB to perform Belichicks offensive schemes would be very hard. Finding a QB to do what Wilson does just couldn't be done. Travaris Jackson has had a lot of success when asked to play. As a backup his stats are through the roof. He has NOT been asked to carry a team on his back recently though. His W/L record was average to below average when he was the starter in Seattle a few years ago.
I haven't looked to see the stats when Brady .is on I/R. My guess is that NE sucks without Tom at the helm.
trying to think of lies to use.hee hee.

