Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the thing that makes me roll out of my chair from laughing so hard is the logic of trolls that people like trollstyle and pooper have that somehow I HATE the cheatriots. that is so funny that they CLAIM i hate the cheats since I am an AFC guy who has ALWAYS rooted for the AFC to win ever since I was little.
When I was a little toddler I was always a huge fan of the pittsburgh steelers since they were so good.Since I loved the steelers so much growing up,I have always been an AFC guy.It was only their last game in the superbowl against the Rams that I instantly became a Rams fan and instantly fell in love with them back then and always remained a fan of them no matter how bad they were until they left LA of course.
so growing up being a steelers fan when I was a toddler,I have always rooted for the AFC to win all the time.only time I did not was last year of course and the other two times Peyton Manning played.I so much hate that asshole.
so the other previous five times the cheats played in the superbowl,I rooted FOR them to win naturally. I was the happiest man alive when they won their first superbowl and beat that phony fraud team that plays in st louis.I parted like crazy that night when I learned later that night that they won that game.
I was ALSO bummed out and depressed the time they lost the superbowl to the Giants.I so badly wanted to see a team have a perfect undefeated season that year.Plus former Chargers players Rodney Harrison and Junior Seau played on that team so it was a double whammy for me to see the pats lose that year.It took a week or so for me to get over that depression of them losing that superbowl.
yet,somehow DESPITE those facts,trollstyle and pooper CLAIM i hate the cheatriots even though i rooted for them to win the previous five superbowls before this one.
they really need to get off that crack they smoke everyday.![]()
this post here of mine obviously shoots down trollstyle and poopers THEORY that I somehow hate the cheats.
Hey I hate the Dallas FAGBOYS with a passion but you know what trollstyle and pooper? I at least could respect THEM when they won three superbowls in the 90's and tip my hat off to them because THEY did not cheat to win those games.
It was ESPECIALLY hard for me back then to give them credit when they beat the steelers since i so badly wanted the steelers to win back then but you know what? unlke you two trolls I swallowed my pride and owned up to it that they won fair and square.
trolls pooper and trollstyle though are to childish to own up to it that this is the biggest scandal in sports history since the black sox scandal they so much have their head up brady and belicheats asses.
You keep avoiding the issues by attacking, Thankfully Brady did not have you as his advocate, Krapt did not share in Brady's good fortune.Dude, you're the one with the fascination with Tom Brady's balls...not me. Hey, at least you're not thinking weird things about Brownie Troops like a few days ago.Now you are asking me personal questions? Guess Brady rejected your advances and I am. Stay on topic the CBA gave every player an advantage as well they voted on acceptance of the agreement. Brady sued the league and voted for it.This is not the "legal system" this is alternative dispute resolution agreed to in the CBA negotiated by the NFLPA with the NFL on behalf of the players like Tommy "small balls" Brady.
Gee, I wonder what players like Brady think about the CBA that's been "negotiated" for them when it takes away rights that every other American has as a matter of course!
Good to see that you're still fixated on Tom Brady's "junk". That seems to be your state of mind every morning, Alex...which begs the question...what are you dreaming about, little buddy?![]()
"The players€™ side would present the agreement to player reps for all 32 clubs, who would vote on whether to recommend the settlement to the plaintiffs in the Brady et al v. National Football League et al lawsuit. The player reps will meet in Washington, D.C., Wednesday, where a vote is expected to take place. The next step could be the recertification of the union, which requires all 1,900 players to vote, a simple majority to pass, and could be done by e-mail or conference call."
NFL player reps could vote on new CBA as early as Wednesday - NFL.com
I hope you are not suggesting I am a peadaphile
How about you just stick to the issues I have outlined, like how Brady sued the NFL to get this CBA and how he voted for the CBA and how he broke his promise to abide by the CBA and how you are gullible enough and filled with such man love that you will defend him no matter what he does and how much he cheats.
No, Dottie's the one with the thoughts of gang banging Brownie Troops rattling around in his VERY strange head...you're the guy with the thing for Tom Brady's package!Seriously, Alex...you keep going back to it...is there an "issue" you're dealing with in your personal life?
the thing that makes me roll out of my chair from laughing so hard is the logic of trolls that people like trollstyle and pooper have that somehow I HATE the cheatriots. that is so funny that they CLAIM i hate the cheats since I am an AFC guy who has ALWAYS rooted for the AFC to win ever since I was little.
When I was a little toddler I was always a huge fan of the pittsburgh steelers since they were so good.Since I loved the steelers so much growing up,I have always been an AFC guy.It was only their last game in the superbowl against the Rams that I instantly became a Rams fan and instantly fell in love with them back then and always remained a fan of them no matter how bad they were until they left LA of course.
so growing up being a steelers fan when I was a toddler,I have always rooted for the AFC to win all the time.only time I did not was last year of course and the other two times Peyton Manning played.I so much hate that asshole.
so the other previous five times the cheats played in the superbowl,I rooted FOR them to win naturally. I was the happiest man alive when they won their first superbowl and beat that phony fraud team that plays in st louis.I parted like crazy that night when I learned later that night that they won that game.
I was ALSO bummed out and depressed the time they lost the superbowl to the Giants.I so badly wanted to see a team have a perfect undefeated season that year.Plus former Chargers players Rodney Harrison and Junior Seau played on that team so it was a double whammy for me to see the pats lose that year.It took a week or so for me to get over that depression of them losing that superbowl.
yet,somehow DESPITE those facts,trollstyle and pooper CLAIM i hate the cheatriots even though i rooted for them to win the previous five superbowls before this one.
they really need to get off that crack they smoke everyday.![]()
this post here of mine obviously shoots down trollstyle and poopers THEORY that I somehow hate the cheats.
Hey I hate the Dallas FAGBOYS with a passion but you know what trollstyle and pooper? I at least could respect THEM when they won three superbowls in the 90's and tip my hat off to them because THEY did not cheat to win those games.
It was ESPECIALLY hard for me back then to give them credit when they beat the steelers since i so badly wanted the steelers to win back then but you know what? unlke you two trolls I swallowed my pride and owned up to it that they won fair and square.
trolls pooper and trollstyle though are to childish to own up to it that this is the biggest scandal in sports history since the black sox scandal they so much have their head up brady and belicheats asses.
How is it that you know what my "theories" are when you have me on ignore? Duh?
You're so full of shit your eyes must be a lovely shade of brown!
Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.Would you like us to start referring to you as Kaitlyn?
Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.Would you like us to start referring to you as Kaitlyn?
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.Would you like us to start referring to you as Kaitlyn?
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
You are dumber than a bag of deflated balls. This is all on Brady, he wanted the rules, he got the rules, from CBA to ball regulations, on both counts he has broken the rules he begged for and now wants to wiggle his way out of it without paying the price. This time he does not have Krapt to protect him, he is no longer as valuable as he used to be to Krapt in the long run.Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.Would you like us to start referring to you as Kaitlyn?
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
So you admit that Brady is well within his rights to appeal? And you also admit that the NFL hasn't proven that Brady violated any rules?
Here's my problem with this whole charade, Alex...you've got NFL rules and then you've got the legal rights of every American. Which takes precedence when push comes to shove? I know the NFL likes to THINK that they can make up rules that take precedence over those legal rights but I'd love to see someone bring a case to the Supreme Court to see if in fact they do. Having players agree to a CBA so that they can play in the league is akin to having workers in a factory give up their legal rights in order to get hired.
You are dumber than a bag of deflated balls. This is all on Brady, he wanted the rules, he got the rules, from CBA to ball regulations, on both counts he has broken the rules he begged for and now wants to wiggle his way out of it without paying the price. This time he does not have Krapt to protect him, he is no longer as valuable as he used to be to Krapt in the long run.Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.Would you like us to start referring to you as Kaitlyn?
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
So you admit that Brady is well within his rights to appeal? And you also admit that the NFL hasn't proven that Brady violated any rules?
Here's my problem with this whole charade, Alex...you've got NFL rules and then you've got the legal rights of every American. Which takes precedence when push comes to shove? I know the NFL likes to THINK that they can make up rules that take precedence over those legal rights but I'd love to see someone bring a case to the Supreme Court to see if in fact they do. Having players agree to a CBA so that they can play in the league is akin to having workers in a factory give up their legal rights in order to get hired.
"So when Brady follows the rules of the CBA and appeals a decision...you think he's trying to "wiggle his way out"?" Read what I wrote, answer it and then I will take you seriously. For many many posts in this thread you are a fanboi and a Brady apologist. Refusal to deal with the realities of the situation and how Brady got to where he is today does not change any facts.You are dumber than a bag of deflated balls. This is all on Brady, he wanted the rules, he got the rules, from CBA to ball regulations, on both counts he has broken the rules he begged for and now wants to wiggle his way out of it without paying the price. This time he does not have Krapt to protect him, he is no longer as valuable as he used to be to Krapt in the long run.Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
So you admit that Brady is well within his rights to appeal? And you also admit that the NFL hasn't proven that Brady violated any rules?
Here's my problem with this whole charade, Alex...you've got NFL rules and then you've got the legal rights of every American. Which takes precedence when push comes to shove? I know the NFL likes to THINK that they can make up rules that take precedence over those legal rights but I'd love to see someone bring a case to the Supreme Court to see if in fact they do. Having players agree to a CBA so that they can play in the league is akin to having workers in a factory give up their legal rights in order to get hired.
So when Brady follows the rules of the CBA and appeals a decision...you think he's trying to "wiggle his way out"?
Once again, nobody has PROVEN that Tom Brady did anything to break the NFL rules on ball inflation. I'm sorry but they haven't! The Wells Report is a joke! It's two hundred pages that come to the conclusion that Brady "might" have known and "might" have asked for something to be done illegally. Well I've got news for you, Alex...if Brady "might" have known...then he also might NOT have known! That's how a word like "might" works! It's why Brady wants this to be heard by an independent arbiter...something that Goodell should have immediately agreed to.
How can the Commissioner serve as both arbiter and a witness in the same case? That wouldn't take place anywhere else yet Goodell is refusing to step aside. This isn't about getting to the truth...it's become a public relations issue.
OldStyle just doesn't get it. Typical cheatriots right or wrong fan boi he is. Sad AND pathetic.Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.Would you like us to start referring to you as Kaitlyn?
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
OldStyle just doesn't get it. Typical cheatriots right or wrong fan boi he is. Sad AND pathetic.Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.Would you like us to start referring to you as Kaitlyn?
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
"So when Brady follows the rules of the CBA and appeals a decision...you think he's trying to "wiggle his way out"?" Read what I wrote, answer it and then I will take you seriously. For many many posts in this thread you are a fanboi and a Brady apologist. Refusal to deal with the realities of the situation and how Brady got to where he is today does not change any facts.You are dumber than a bag of deflated balls. This is all on Brady, he wanted the rules, he got the rules, from CBA to ball regulations, on both counts he has broken the rules he begged for and now wants to wiggle his way out of it without paying the price. This time he does not have Krapt to protect him, he is no longer as valuable as he used to be to Krapt in the long run.Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
So you admit that Brady is well within his rights to appeal? And you also admit that the NFL hasn't proven that Brady violated any rules?
Here's my problem with this whole charade, Alex...you've got NFL rules and then you've got the legal rights of every American. Which takes precedence when push comes to shove? I know the NFL likes to THINK that they can make up rules that take precedence over those legal rights but I'd love to see someone bring a case to the Supreme Court to see if in fact they do. Having players agree to a CBA so that they can play in the league is akin to having workers in a factory give up their legal rights in order to get hired.
So when Brady follows the rules of the CBA and appeals a decision...you think he's trying to "wiggle his way out"?
Once again, nobody has PROVEN that Tom Brady did anything to break the NFL rules on ball inflation. I'm sorry but they haven't! The Wells Report is a joke! It's two hundred pages that come to the conclusion that Brady "might" have known and "might" have asked for something to be done illegally. Well I've got news for you, Alex...if Brady "might" have known...then he also might NOT have known! That's how a word like "might" works! It's why Brady wants this to be heard by an independent arbiter...something that Goodell should have immediately agreed to.
How can the Commissioner serve as both arbiter and a witness in the same case? That wouldn't take place anywhere else yet Goodell is refusing to step aside. This isn't about getting to the truth...it's become a public relations issue.
You are dumber than a bag of deflated balls. This is all on Brady, he wanted the rules, he got the rules, from CBA to ball regulations, on both counts he has broken the rules he begged for and now wants to wiggle his way out of it without paying the price. This time he does not have Krapt to protect him, he is no longer as valuable as he used to be to Krapt in the long run.Not cooperating with the investigation is the violation. Appealing is his right cooperating is his obligation.Can you see how foolish you look? How about addressing the issues.
For some strange reason you seem to think that Tom Brady appealing the ruling that was made by the NFL somehow violates the collective bargaining agreement that he signed. Since appeals are part of the process how is Brady doing anything to violate the CBA?
So you admit that Brady is well within his rights to appeal? And you also admit that the NFL hasn't proven that Brady violated any rules?
Here's my problem with this whole charade, Alex...you've got NFL rules and then you've got the legal rights of every American. Which takes precedence when push comes to shove? I know the NFL likes to THINK that they can make up rules that take precedence over those legal rights but I'd love to see someone bring a case to the Supreme Court to see if in fact they do. Having players agree to a CBA so that they can play in the league is akin to having workers in a factory give up their legal rights in order to get hired.
So when Brady follows the rules of the CBA and appeals a decision...you think he's trying to "wiggle his way out"?
Once again, nobody has PROVEN that Tom Brady did anything to break the NFL rules on ball inflation. I'm sorry but they haven't! The Wells Report is a joke! It's two hundred pages that come to the conclusion that Brady "might" have known and "might" have asked for something to be done illegally. Well I've got news for you, Alex...if Brady "might" have known...then he also might NOT have known! That's how a word like "might" works! Any good defense attorney would have a field day with nonsense like what Ted Wells came up with. It's why Brady wants this to be heard by an independent arbiter...something that Goodell should have immediately agreed to.
On that same note how can the Commissioner serve as both arbiter and witness in the same case? That wouldn't take place anywhere else yet Goodell is refusing to step aside. This isn't about getting to the truth...it's become a public relations issue.