Parkland Deputy Who Sat on His Ass as Kids Were Shot Arrested on 11 Charges

Kinda blows that silly "Good guy with a gun" theory out of the water, doesn't it?

Hasty generalizations are general statements without sufficient evidence to support them. They are general claims too hastily made, hence they commit some sort of illicit assumption, stereotyping, unwarranted conclusion, overstatement, or exaggeration.

So the NRA is guilty of illicit assumption, stereotyping, unwarranted conclusion, overstatement, or exaggeration. Say it ain't sooooooo.
 
Kinda blows that silly "Good guy with a gun" theory out of the water, doesn't it?

He obviously wasn't a good guy if he stood there and let children be massacred.

Coward is a more apt description

Yes, he was a coward too, but he had a gun. He hadn't been convicted of a major crime. That exactly fits the NRA's definition of a Good Guy With a Gun.

That right.....NRA ftmfw. We detest the fags of society like you who would disarm and then try to ban nails and glass. Ghey:gay:

The NRA.....delivering bumpy cucumbers to the fags daily. The NRA doesnt embrace gheyness. Always have dominated.....always will:flirtysmile4:Cant do dick about it either!:2up:
 
The NRA.....delivering bumpy cucumbers to the fags daily. Always have.....always will:flirtysmile4:Cant do dick about it either!:2up:
Nah, they were a recreational shooting organisation back in the day, before they became lobbyists for the domestic firearm industry.
 
Kinda blows that silly "Good guy with a gun" theory out of the water, doesn't it?

He obviously wasn't a good guy if he stood there and let children be massacred.

Coward is a more apt description

Yes, he was a coward too, but he had a gun. He hadn't been convicted of a major crime. That exactly fits the NRA's definition of a Good Guy With a Gun.

No it doesn't you goddamn idiot

Why not? He perfectly fit the NRA definition of a good guy with a gun. The NRA doesn't make any distinction on whether they are cowards.
 
The NRA.....delivering bumpy cucumbers to the fags daily. Always have.....always will:flirtysmile4:Cant do dick about it either!:2up:
Nah, they were a recreational shooting organisation back in the day, before they became lobbyists for the domestic firearm industry.

Blah....blah.....tough shit on you I guess!! We love the NRA. And the country thinks gun grabbing is ghey
 
Kinda blows that silly "Good guy with a gun" theory out of the water, doesn't it?

He obviously wasn't a good guy if he stood there and let children be massacred.

Coward is a more apt description

Yes, he was a coward too, but he had a gun. He hadn't been convicted of a major crime. That exactly fits the NRA's definition of a Good Guy With a Gun.

No it doesn't you goddamn idiot

Why not? He perfectly fit the NRA definition of a good guy with a gun. The NRA doesn't make any distinction on whether they are cowards.

Take your limited knowledge and try another thread to embarrass yourself....again
 
If the son of a bitch wasn't prepared to protect those children he should have asked for a transfer. Maybe a desk jockey
 
Kinda blows that silly "Good guy with a gun" theory out of the water, doesn't it?

He obviously wasn't a good guy if he stood there and let children be massacred.

Coward is a more apt description

Yes, he was a coward too, but he had a gun. He hadn't been convicted of a major crime. That exactly fits the NRA's definition of a Good Guy With a Gun.

That right.....NRA ftmfw. We detest the fags of society like you who would disarm and then try to ban nails and glass. Ghey:gay:

The NRA.....delivering bumpy cucumbers to the fags daily. The NRA doesnt embrace gheyness. Always have dominated.....always will:flirtysmile4:Cant do dick about it either!:2up:

Ban nails and glass? Are you high right now?
I didn't really follow your BDSM rant because I'm not into all that, but if that's what you are into, perhaps you should form a business venture with MikeTx. I'm sure you have a lot in common. Either way, I don't see what any of that has to do with that coward good guy with a gun that didn't do anything to protect those kids.
 
Kinda blows that silly "Good guy with a gun" theory out of the water, doesn't it?


No....not really.....

The truth......

Armed Citizens Are Successful 94% Of The Time At Active Shooter Events [FBI]

Of all the active shooter events there were 33 at which an armed citizen was present. Of those, Armed Citizens were successful at stopping the Active shooter 75.8% of the time (25 incidents) and were successful in reducing the loss of life in an additional 18.2% (6) of incidents. In only 2 of the 33 incidents (6.1%) was the Armed Citizen(s) not helpful in any way in stopping the active shooter or reducing the loss of life.

Thus the headline of our report that Armed Citizens Are Successful 94% Of The Time At Active Shooter Events.



In the 2 incidents at which the armed citizen “failed” to stop or slow the active shooter, one is the previously mentioned incident with hunters. The other is an incident in which the CCWer was shot in the back in a Las Vegas Walmart when he failed to identify that there were 2 Active Shooters involved in the attack. He neglected to identify the one that shot him in the back while he was trying to ambush the other perpetrator.

We also decided to look at the breakdown of events that took place in gun free zones and the relative death toll from events in gun free zones vs non-gun-free zones.

Of the 283 incidents in our data pool, we were unable to identify if the event took place in a gun-free zone in a large number (41%) of the events. Most of the events took place at a business, church, home, or other places at which as a rule of law it is not a gun free zone but potentially could have been declared one by the property owner. Without any information in the FBI study or any indication one way or the other from the news reports, we have indicated that event with a question mark.

If you look at all of the Active Shooter events (pie chart on the top) you see that for those which we have the information, almost twice as many took place in gun free zones than not; but realistically the vast majority of those for which we have no information (indicated as ?) are probably NOT gun free zones.

If you isolate just the events at which 8 or more people were killed the data paints a different picture (pie chart on the bottom). In these incidents, 77.8% took place in a gun-free zone suggesting that gun free zones lead to a higher death rate vs active shooter events in general

=====

One of the final metrics we thought was important to consider is the potential tendency for armed citizens to injure or kill innocent people in their attempt to “save the day.” A common point in political discussions is to point out the lack of training of most armed citizens and the decrease in safety inherent in their presence during violent encounters.

As you can see below, however, at the 33 incidents at which Armed Citizens were present, there were zero situations at which the Armed Citizen injured or killed an innocent person. It never happened.
 
100 years isn't long enough for this sniveling coward
Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to the conclusion that he's a coward?

Children were being massacred and he did nothing to try and save them


You won't change my mind...don't attempt it
He did do something. He used his radio.

What would you have done, Rambo?

Anything I could to save those children. I carry

The better question what would you have done....nothing like the coward?
 
100 years isn't long enough for this sniveling coward
Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to the conclusion that he's a coward?

Children were being massacred and he did nothing to try and save them


You won't change my mind...don't attempt it
He did do something. He used his radio.

What would you have done, Rambo?

Holy fuck s0n.....this is why putting guys like you in charge of anything is dangerous.

You dickhead....he disregarded his training. It's not cut and run and dive for cover. Failed to do his job and thus received the big bumpy.
 
100 years isn't long enough for this sniveling coward
Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to the conclusion that he's a coward?

Children were being massacred and he did nothing to try and save them


You won't change my mind...don't attempt it
He did do something. He used his radio.

What would you have done, Rambo?

Holy fuck s0n.....this is why putting guys like you in charge of anything is dangerous.

You dickhead....he disregarded his training. It's not cut and run and dive for cover. Failed to do his job and thus received the big bumpy.

No no he used his radio....good gawd
 

Forum List

Back
Top