Parkland Deputy Who Sat on His Ass as Kids Were Shot Arrested on 11 Charges

Does this mean that any cop who does not give up his life in the line of fire can be prosecuted?

The question is not whether a cop is duty bound to sacrifice his life. The question is, just what do we demand from those to whom we entrust the public safety? And I believe that you know that.

In this case, answer honestly. Why was an armed cop in the school in the first place?

If the answer is, "To stop anyone who tries to harm the teachers and children", you have the answer to your question.

If the answer is to hide and clean up the carnage, inevitably the question becomes, "Why give him a gun and have him patrol the grounds"? I do believe you support the idea that with the use of a firearm comes responsibility. In this case, we armed a security officer and gave him responsibility to protect the children. It should be clear when a person accepts that responsibility if we expect him to put himself in danger or if it's acceptable to hide when a stand gunman shows up.
 
The question is not whether a cop is duty bound to sacrifice his life. The question is, just what do we demand from those to whom we entrust the public safety? And I believe that you know that.

In this case, answer honestly. Why was an armed cop in the school in the first place?

If the answer is, "To stop anyone who tries to harm the teachers and children", you have the answer to your question.

If the answer is to hide and clean up the carnage, inevitably the question becomes, "Why give him a gun and have him patrol the grounds"? I do believe you support the idea that with the use of a firearm comes responsibility. In this case, we armed a security officer and gave him responsibility to protect the children. It should be clear when a person accepts that responsibility if we expect him to put himself in danger or if it's acceptable to hide when a stand gunman shows up.
Well summed up. Not knowing the particulars of a court decision that says law officers are not required to save lives
I have to believe the decision is more nuanced than that (police don't have to save lives...period).

The actions of Scott Israel in assigning this man to patrol
a local high school and Scott Peterson's decision to accept that assignment show a high degree of culpability when so many children wind up being slaughtered by a mentally ill student.
 
Children were being massacred and he did nothing to try and save them


You won't change my mind...don't attempt it
He did do something. He used his radio.

What would you have done, Rambo?
He should have done just as what his training told him to do - go stop the shooter.

If he didn’t like that idea he should have resigned as a cadet and stop taking the taxpayers money.

Better the coward die then innocent defenseless children
So you would have jumped in front of the bullets, Rambo?

s0n....the guy is going down because there is a perception of law enforcement that must be maintained in the public view. It makes your views irrelevant. You'll notice that on almost every issue on this forum, you remain in the clear minority.

In this, you ask 1,000 people and well over 95% are outraged the guy didnt do dick. Not debatable....but guess you can still takes bows for views waaaaaaaay off the margin!!:2up::113::113:

I think I the Supreme Court precedents will make it almost impossible to convict him of anything.
 
Kinda blows that silly "Good guy with a gun" theory out of the water, doesn't it?

He obviously wasn't a good guy if he stood there and let children be massacred.

Coward is a more apt description

Yes, he was a coward too, but he had a gun. He hadn't been convicted of a major crime. That exactly fits the NRA's definition of a Good Guy With a Gun.
This thread is about the Parkland shooter
If you wanna castigate good people of the NRA go start your own thread
Try and keep up
 
When the stupid Moon Bats tell you that you don't need firearms to protect yourself because the police will do it for you just remind them that the police failed the students at Parkland when they really needed it.
 
When the stupid Moon Bats tell you that you don't need firearms to protect yourself because the police will do it for you just remind them that the police failed the students at Parkland when they really needed it.
Tell them the same thing about arming teachers
 
Does this mean that any cop who does not give up his life in the line of fire can be prosecuted?

? not material to the discussion s0n.

You do it every day in here.

Like discussing Jessie Smollette, you immediately bypass everything and pivot to "racism". Ghey. Fake:bye1::bye1:
Fail

Answer the question

Doesnt pertain to the discussion s0n.....you know it too!!:2up:. Typical ghey progressive girly man stunt.
 
D8PUu_dVsAAAOEX.jpg


This is why the fakenews MSM has stopped talking about the Virginia Beach shooting.
Yeah, let's give the shooter all the air time you need to be satisfied that someone else can be just like him-derp....
 
When the stupid Moon Bats tell you that you don't need firearms to protect yourself because the police will do it for you just remind them that the police failed the students at Parkland when they really needed it.
Tell them the same thing about arming teachers

You dont possess any ability to think on the margin s0n. Like all progressives, you seek a perfect solution to every societal problem when frequently, none exists. Conservatives seek the best possible solution seeing no perfect solution is possible. It's called having the ability to think on the margin.

Arming teachers is a no brainer. Doy....has inherent problems but the solutions from progressives is to ban guns which is a non- solution and Disney thinking.

You find that out when an armed teacher saves 20 kids from certain death. But if a teacher goes psycho and shoots a couple of colleagues, you ditch the whole plan if you are a progressive. The progressive cant capably weigh necessary tradeoffs in life = inability to think on the margin. It's a brain fuck up.
 
When the stupid Moon Bats tell you that you don't need firearms to protect yourself because the police will do it for you just remind them that the police failed the students at Parkland when they really needed it.
Tell them the same thing about arming teachers

You dont possess any ability to think on the margin s0n. Like all progressives, you seek a perfect solution to every societal problem when frequently, none exists. Conservatives seek the best possible solution seeing no perfect solution is possible. It's called having the ability to think on the margin.

Arming teachers is a no brainer. Doy....has inherent problems but the solutions from progressives is to ban guns which is a non- solution and Disney thinking.

You find that out when an armed teacher saves 20 kids from certain death. But if a teacher goes psycho and shoots a couple of colleagues, you ditch the whole plan if you are a progressive. The progressive cant capably weigh necessary tradeoffs in life = inability to think on the margin. It's a brain fuck up.


We have already had situations where an armed teacher saved the lives of students but these stupid Moon Bats don't want to hear it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top