Paramount Agrees to pay Trump $16 million in CBS 60 Minutes lawsuit

[frigidweirdo]

Did they not edit the interview to male harris look better? Did they not rearrange her answer to make her sound better than she did?

Are you suggesting that no interview of Trump's was ever edited?

Fox News edited Trump interview days after he slammed Harris over ‘60 Minutes’

Trump has called for CBS to have its broadcasting license revoked for editing it’s interview with Harris

www.independent.co.uk

"Fox News edited Trump interview days after former president slammed Harris over ‘60 Minutes’ sit down"

"
On Monday, the network ran a roughly 15-minute edition of its barbershop interview series featuring the former president. Lawrence Jones, co-host of Fox and Friends, has been traveling around the country speaking with voters at barbershops.

At a Bronx barbershop, Trump sat with a group of locals and answered their questions about taxes, immigration, education, energy and more. The former president gave vague but on-topic answers making promises for a wealthier country with lower taxes for all, healthier food and less crime.


But raw footage from the event, posted on Instagram by an attendee, depicts Trump as he appears at rallies – giving long-winded, rambling answers that often veer off topic and are peppered with bits of misinformation."

If it's against the law, then get Trump for breaking the law. Or is it only against the law when someone Trump doesn't like does it?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Do you have evidence that fox edited his interviews to rearrange his answer to put them with questions that were not the question they asked, to make him appear to be giving better answers than he did?

If you do, then harris should sue fox news

Yep, see my previous post.

 

[egp320i]

Yep, see my previous post.

why the need? trump was sharp and on his game, harris was a drunk idiot they tried to manipulate her stupid out so the American people would not see she's a flake and not fit to be president.

take off the blinders......see the light

 

[frigidweirdo]

why the need? trump was sharp and on his game, harris was a drunk idiot they tried to manipulate her stupid out so the American people would not see she's a flake and not fit to be president.

take off the blinders......see the light

I'm supposed to take the blinders off, but you're the one going "This is bad, it's illegal when Kamala does it, but it's perfectly fine and legal when Trump does it."

What shit is that?

 

[egp320i]

I'm supposed to take the blinders off, but you're the one going "This is bad, it's illegal when Kamala does it, but it's perfectly fine and legal when Trump does it."

What shit is that?

again, what proof that trump did anything like this? he was prepared, he gave answers, not some word salad tangent that was not the question asked.
harris is a drunk flake and as much as CBS tried to doctor it they could not and they got caught doing so

this is not rocket science.....just move on, why do you care at all, it's not your money and this won't impact your life whatsoever.

if you want a soap box go shout this out in your town square, maybe some left wingers will clap for you who are likely clueless what you are even talking about.

just do a reality check, that's all and determine when something it out of your control and let it go

 

[frigidweirdo]

again, what proof that trump did anything like this? he was prepared, he gave answers, not some word salad tangent that was not the question asked.
harris is a drunk flake and as much as CBS tried to doctor it they could not and they got caught doing so

this is not rocket science.....just move on, why do you care at all, it's not your money and this won't impact your life whatsoever.

if you want a soap box go shout this out in your town square, maybe some left wingers will clap for you who are likely clueless what you are even talking about.

just do a reality check, that's all and determine when something it out of your control and let it go

Again, you're being hypocritical. You're not being objective. Waste of time.

 

[egp320i]

Again, you're being hypocritical. You're not being objective. Waste of time.

really? objective is as I see it and harris was a drunk flake, not sure what you seen but the world did and she lost badly.

why are you trying to spin a narrative that does not exist? are you that self loathing because you cast your vote for her?

harris will be a small footnote in history as a half black/indian female that bombed to become president

nothing I stated was hypocritical and you can't point it out........oh wait.......trump this and trump that.

gotcha

 

[ThisIsMe]

Are you suggesting that no interview of Trump's was ever edited?

Fox News edited Trump interview days after he slammed Harris over ‘60 Minutes’

Trump has called for CBS to have its broadcasting license revoked for editing it’s interview with Harris

www.independent.co.uk

"Fox News edited Trump interview days after former president slammed Harris over ‘60 Minutes’ sit down"

"
On Monday, the network ran a roughly 15-minute edition of its barbershop interview series featuring the former president. Lawrence Jones, co-host of Fox and Friends, has been traveling around the country speaking with voters at barbershops.

At a Bronx barbershop, Trump sat with a group of locals and answered their questions about taxes, immigration, education, energy and more. The former president gave vague but on-topic answers making promises for a wealthier country with lower taxes for all, healthier food and less crime.


But raw footage from the event, posted on Instagram by an attendee, depicts Trump as he appears at rallies – giving long-winded, rambling answers that often veer off topic and are peppered with bits of misinformation."

If it's against the law, then get Trump for breaking the law. Or is it only against the law when someone Trump doesn't like does it?

all television segments are edited, usually for time, but if you have seen that fox edited the interview to cut answers from one question to re arrange them to put them with another question to make the interviewee look better, then by all means, get a lawyer.

That doesnt negate what they did for harris. They chopped up her interview and moved answers around to make her appear more appealing than the answers she originally gave. Democrats would call that an in kind donation.

 

[Marener]

That doesnt negate what they did for harris. They chopped up her interview and moved answers around to make her appear more appealing than the answers she originally gave. Democrats would call that an in kind donation.

That’s not what they did.

 

[struth]

You definitely implied it by claiming a distinction between journalism and activism.

Of course you can edit interviews. That’s fundamental to the freedom of speech, which you clearly aren’t a big fan of.

No you can’t edit interviews and change what someone says

That’s fundamentally opposite of free speech.

It’s censorship

 

[struth]

That’s not what they did.

Why do you lie

 

[Marener]

No you can’t edit interviews and change what someone says

That’s fundamentally opposite of free speech.

It’s censorship

CBS had a first amendment right to air the portions of the interview they deem relevant.

 

[ThisIsMe]

That’s not what they did.

That was the original claim. In the recent release of the unedited interview, it certainly shows they cut and spliced her answers to remove all the word salads.

At the end of the day, it all boils down to the same thing. They edited her interview to make her appear more coherent.

 

[Marener]

That was the original claim. In the recent release of the unedited interview, it certainly shows they cut and spliced her answers to remove all the word salads.

At the end of the day, it all boils down to the same thing. They edited her interview to make her appear more coherent.

They edited out portions of the questions and portions of the responses.

There was no impact in the context or meaning of the interview.

Nothing was rearranged. Just editing for brevity.

Trump lied about this, and it appears you may have believed his lies.

 

[frigidweirdo]

all television segments are edited, usually for time, but if you have seen that fox edited the interview to cut answers from one question to re arrange them to put them with another question to make the interviewee look better, then by all means, get a lawyer.

That doesnt negate what they did for harris. They chopped up her interview and moved answers around to make her appear more appealing than the answers she originally gave. Democrats would call that an in kind donation.

All CBS did was cut the first part of the question. Essentially Kamala said nothing for the first part, then kind of answered the question for the latter.

That's not what you're saying it is. You don't know what you're talking about because you haven't taken the time to figure it out, even though I'VE POSTED IT.

 

[ThisIsMe]

They edited out portions of the questions and portions of the responses.

There was no impact in the context or meaning of the interview.

Nothing was rearranged. Just editing for brevity.

Trump lied about this, and it appears you may have believed his lies.

thats one take on it, another is, they edited her word salads to be more concise to make her look better.

If they did that for trump, you all would be on the other side of this

 

[ThisIsMe]

All CBS did was cut the first part of the question. Essentially Kamala said nothing for the first part, then kind of answered the question for the latter.

That's not what you're saying it is. You don't know what you're talking about because you haven't taken the time to figure it out, even though I'VE POSTED IT.

So they edited her responses to make her look better. Its the same thing

 

[frigidweirdo]

So they edited her responses to make her look better. Its the same thing

Again, it's NOT ILLEGAL TO DO SO.

Again, IT HAPPENS TO EVERYONE

Funny how you and Trump have a problem with it when it goes against you, but don't have a problem when you're the ones doing it.

Hypocrisy and ridiculousness in massive amounts.

 

[Marener]

thats one take on it, another is, they edited her word salads to be more concise to make her look better.

If they did that for trump, you all would be on the other side of this

Trump lied about it and you seemed to agree with his lie, claiming they switched answers and questions. Why does he need to lie?

Who says they don’t do that for Trump?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Again, it's NOT ILLEGAL TO DO SO.

Again, IT HAPPENS TO EVERYONE

Funny how you and Trump have a problem with it when it goes against you, but don't have a problem when you're the ones doing it.

Hypocrisy and ridiculousness in massive amounts.

I dont care about editing for time, but when you are editing to change the person's image, thats an issue. You'd all be up in arms over it if they did it for trump