Palin on Ukraine: I told you so

Tell me if Benghazi is the scandal you say it is, why is it that ONLY republicans and Fox News still talk about it?

God Damn, Billy!

WTF do you use for sensory input?

Your ass?

You can't use your eyes or ears because we have been telling you this shit all along.

The main stream media is no longer practicing objective journalism.

They have become an arm of the Democrat Party.

They will not report anything unflattering to Obama or not in line with his agenda unless it is too huge to ignore.

Fox News and the RW talk radio and online conservative sources keep us informed so that we can bring pressure to bear on the MSM and the administration to acknowledge what we are seeing and reporting.

Things the Obama regime and their corrupted media (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT and etc.) would rather you stay ignorant of.

When you start watching FNC and listening to Rush and Levin and Beck and reading Sowell and Malkin and Lowry and watching Krauthammer then you will stop being the last to know these things.

Your current info sources are failing you.

If you had a business and you relied on your current info sources to keep you abreast of significant happenings in the USA and the World in order to run your business you'd go broke by being kept in the dark by those you seem to trust.

They are not trustworthy to anyone who values a strong Republic.

Every major news network covered what happened in Benghazi. Plenty of coverage.

Are you so dense to not even consider that Fox just has an agenda? Why in god's name is that so hard to believe? Do you really trust Fox that much?

Wherever you come from you must have never heard of the fundamental creed of journalism.

To comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.

Today's media sucks up to Obama.

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?
 
God Damn, Billy!

WTF do you use for sensory input?

Your ass?

You can't use your eyes or ears because we have been telling you this shit all along.

The main stream media is no longer practicing objective journalism.

They have become an arm of the Democrat Party.

They will not report anything unflattering to Obama or not in line with his agenda unless it is too huge to ignore.

Fox News and the RW talk radio and online conservative sources keep us informed so that we can bring pressure to bear on the MSM and the administration to acknowledge what we are seeing and reporting.

Things the Obama regime and their corrupted media (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT and etc.) would rather you stay ignorant of.

When you start watching FNC and listening to Rush and Levin and Beck and reading Sowell and Malkin and Lowry and watching Krauthammer then you will stop being the last to know these things.

Your current info sources are failing you.

If you had a business and you relied on your current info sources to keep you abreast of significant happenings in the USA and the World in order to run your business you'd go broke by being kept in the dark by those you seem to trust.

They are not trustworthy to anyone who values a strong Republic.

Every major news network covered what happened in Benghazi. Plenty of coverage.

Are you so dense to not even consider that Fox just has an agenda? Why in god's name is that so hard to believe? Do you really trust Fox that much?

Wherever you come from you must have never heard of the fundamental creed of journalism.

To comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.

Today's media sucks up to Obama.

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?

Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.
 
Every major news network covered what happened in Benghazi. Plenty of coverage.

Are you so dense to not even consider that Fox just has an agenda? Why in god's name is that so hard to believe? Do you really trust Fox that much?

Wherever you come from you must have never heard of the fundamental creed of journalism.

To comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.

Today's media sucks up to Obama.

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?

Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.

That's just it.

FNC's coverage of things inconvenient to the regime force other networks to delve more into verboten areas or into doing more in depth reporting than they otherwise would. After all, when FNC uncovers something CNN considers big enough they HAVE to give it coverage too or else look bad by comparison.

They all covered Benghazi. But without the continued pressure from Conservative news sources the inconvenient facts would never see the light of day.

the important questions would never get asked.

No more than the perfunctory Senate hearings and the most superficial questions would get asked.

This very Republic DEPENDS on a strong zealous boodhound always alert and always adversarial to a degree, to keep those in power honest.

FNC presents the news and invites you to decide.

The MSM reports what they think gets them the best ratings and pleases the regime and tells you that any other news is teh bunk and that you should only pay attention to what THEY tell you.

That's how we got this bastard in the WH in the first place.
 
Obama+and+the+world+map.jpg


looking for the Ukraine - or maybe America
 
Last edited:
Every major news network covered what happened in Benghazi. Plenty of coverage.

Are you so dense to not even consider that Fox just has an agenda? Why in god's name is that so hard to believe? Do you really trust Fox that much?

Wherever you come from you must have never heard of the fundamental creed of journalism.

To comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.

Today's media sucks up to Obama.

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?

Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.

Please answer this question:

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?
 
[MENTION=33739]Billy000[/MENTION]

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?
 
Let's move on. I think even Billy now gets the message that FNC is a vital part of our free society.
 
Wherever you come from you must have never heard of the fundamental creed of journalism.

To comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.

Today's media sucks up to Obama.

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?

Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.

That's just it.

FNC's coverage of things inconvenient to the regime force other networks to delve more into verboten areas or into doing more in depth reporting than they otherwise would. After all, when FNC uncovers something CNN considers big enough they HAVE to give it coverage too or else look bad by comparison.

They all covered Benghazi. But without the continued pressure from Conservative news sources the inconvenient facts would never see the light of day.

the important questions would never get asked.

No more than the perfunctory Senate hearings and the most superficial questions would get asked.

This very Republic DEPENDS on a strong zealous boodhound always alert and always adversarial to a degree, to keep those in power honest.

FNC presents the news and invites you to decide.

The MSM reports what they think gets them the best ratings and pleases the regime and tells you that any other news is teh bunk and that you should only pay attention to what THEY tell you.

That's how we got this bastard in the WH in the first place.

You're both wrong. Neither is a reliable source of information. Both sources are in the tank for the CFR. They both want you tearing at each others throats. Thank you for giving them what they want. Go to an independent source, the Chinese News agency, Irans News Agency, or Russia's New Agency. Every news agency has an agenda, but the CFR and Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, which control most of the news services and MSM around the world are the worst.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FPAQlbmlSc]The CFR Controls American News/Media - YouTube[/ame]

Hillary Clinton's 'hacked' Benghazi emails sent to RT
http://rt.com/usa/clinton-emails-guccifer-benghazi-492/

3.jpg


According to the Blumenthal memos, though, even the US secretary of state was being fed disinformation directly after the attack. In the email dated Sept. 12, Sec. Clinton is told that the anti-Islamic film was likely the catalyst for the assault.

. . . .
Five months later, though, another memo sent to Mrs. Clinton painted a much different picture of what was happening abroad. An email dated Feb. 16, 2013 contains the subject line “Algeria/Libya/Terrorism” and touches on possible connections between the Benghazi assault and the January 2013 hostage crisis in In Amenas, Algeria near the Libyan border. In that dispatch, links are drawn between both major incidents.
4.jpg

Previously, the hackers known as Guccifer has been linked to breaching the Facebook account of Gen. Colin Powell, who served as secretary of state under George W. Bush, and members of the Bush dynasty. Guccifer has also targeted a “US Senator, a senior United Nations official, security contractors in Iraq, two former FBI agents and a Department of Defense supervisor,” the Smoking Gun reports.

In the leaked memos disseminated to the media, Guccifer opted to copy-and-paste the correspondence into new files — images of bold Comic Sans text layered over a pink backgrounds — likely as a security precaution to cover his own tracks.

The latest batch of emails was reportedly sent from the hacked AOL account of a Hollywood actor’s wife in a further bid to obscure his whereabouts. Two IP addresses linked to Gufficer have been traced back to the Russian Federation TSG reports, though hackers regularly engage in forms of subterfuge to conceal their actual location via proxies, IP spoofing and onion routing systems such as TOR.
 
Wherever you come from you must have never heard of the fundamental creed of journalism.

To comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.

Today's media sucks up to Obama.

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?

Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.

That's just it.

FNC's coverage of things inconvenient to the regime force other networks to delve more into verboten areas or into doing more in depth reporting than they otherwise would. After all, when FNC uncovers something CNN considers big enough they HAVE to give it coverage too or else look bad by comparison.

They all covered Benghazi. But without the continued pressure from Conservative news sources the inconvenient facts would never see the light of day.

the important questions would never get asked.

No more than the perfunctory Senate hearings and the most superficial questions would get asked.

This very Republic DEPENDS on a strong zealous boodhound always alert and always adversarial to a degree, to keep those in power honest.

FNC presents the news and invites you to decide.

The MSM reports what they think gets them the best ratings and pleases the regime and tells you that any other news is teh bunk and that you should only pay attention to what THEY tell you.

That's how we got this bastard in the WH in the first place.

Now you're just rambling.
 
Wherever you come from you must have never heard of the fundamental creed of journalism.

To comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.

Today's media sucks up to Obama.

Without FNC who would present the truth that Obama wants to hide?

Who?

Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.

That's just it.

FNC's coverage of things inconvenient to the regime force other networks to delve more into verboten areas or into doing more in depth reporting than they otherwise would. After all, when FNC uncovers something CNN considers big enough they HAVE to give it coverage too or else look bad by comparison.

They all covered Benghazi. But without the continued pressure from Conservative news sources the inconvenient facts would never see the light of day.

the important questions would never get asked.

No more than the perfunctory Senate hearings and the most superficial questions would get asked.

This very Republic DEPENDS on a strong zealous boodhound always alert and always adversarial to a degree, to keep those in power honest.

FNC presents the news and invites you to decide.

The MSM reports what they think gets them the best ratings and pleases the regime and tells you that any other news is teh bunk and that you should only pay attention to what THEY tell you.

That's how we got this bastard in the WH in the first place.
The Left Media NEVER vetted him...chose NOT to tell the truth...wonder why?
 
Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.

That's just it.

FNC's coverage of things inconvenient to the regime force other networks to delve more into verboten areas or into doing more in depth reporting than they otherwise would. After all, when FNC uncovers something CNN considers big enough they HAVE to give it coverage too or else look bad by comparison.

They all covered Benghazi. But without the continued pressure from Conservative news sources the inconvenient facts would never see the light of day.

the important questions would never get asked.

No more than the perfunctory Senate hearings and the most superficial questions would get asked.

This very Republic DEPENDS on a strong zealous boodhound always alert and always adversarial to a degree, to keep those in power honest.

FNC presents the news and invites you to decide.

The MSM reports what they think gets them the best ratings and pleases the regime and tells you that any other news is teh bunk and that you should only pay attention to what THEY tell you.

That's how we got this bastard in the WH in the first place.
The Left Media NEVER vetted him...chose NOT to tell the truth...wonder why?

Because he is BLACK!!!

El Rushbo:

Don Lemon, anchor at CNN last night on a CNN program. This is after Obama had announced it...

LEMON: As journalists, you know, you weigh whether you -- how much you should criticize the president, because he's black, what have you. But then you have to do it, because ultimately you're a journalist.

RUSH: What? What in...? How did that get in here? Don Lemon says you weigh as a journalist whether you could criticize Obama because he's black, as you announce the My Brother's Keeper Program? Play that again. This kind of snuck in there. I mean, even these sound bites are sneaking in now to the roster. Listen to this. (replaying of sound bite)

Well, when are you gonna start?

Well, he says here, "As journalists, you know, you weigh whether you -- how much you should criticize the president, because he's black..." Why does that even matter? See, this is the point. The president's race handcuffs everybody, not just journalists. Republicans, everybody, are scared to death to be critical of even his policy 'cause he's black -- and here's Don Lemon admitting:

"As journalists, you know, you weigh whether you -- how much you should criticize the president, because he's black, what have you. But then you have to do it, because ultimately you're a journalist." Yeah, well, when are you going to start this criticism? 'Cause, frankly, there isn't any, Mr. Lemon. Here's more of Mr. Lemon now saying Obama is acting to help the black community, the reason he's doing this.

This is the same guy who just said it's time now to criticize Obama despite the fact he's black now explaining why Obama is doing this and... Well, here. Just listen to it.

LEMON: By taking this on as an initiative, as he has promised to do even beyond his presidency, he can take the politics out of it, and he doesn't have to worry about some conservative or someone who may be bigoted or racist saying, "Hey, you know, why don't you do things for white people? You're the president of everybody." We get that. He also has a responsibility as a black man to help that from which he came, and that's from the black community. It was amazing, it was emotional, and it was the most candid I've seen the president.

RUSH: That's just unbelievable. A, Obama didn't come from the black community. He came from a white enclave in Hawaii. Number two, "he doesn't have to worry about some conservative or someone who may be bigoted or racist," 'cause, see, they all are. All these conservatives, they're racists and bigots, and it would be racist and bigoted to say, "Hey, why not a brother's keeper for white kids? Why you leaving them out?"

Well, Obama has to leave them out, because he didn't come from white kids. He came from the black community, and because of that, he has "a responsibility as a black man" to help the people from whence he came in the black community. There is no journalism anymore. There is no news. Why didn't this guy win the Cronkite award instead of the three-day-old kid that got it on MSNBC?

This is embarrassing. "By taking this on as a mission, Obama, because..."? He's the president of everybody, Mr. Lemon. No, but because he's black, he can only worry about black kids 'cause these conservative bigots and racists can't question it. You can't deal with them. Keep in mind here, Dinesh D'Souza, who did a movie on Obama's brother being still left in the hut and all that, had the FEC sicked on him. Dinesh D'Souza gave him some money, Obama's brother.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Look, Obama is not down for the struggle, not by his upbringing. He was raised by white grandparents. His white grandmother was "a typical white woman," but still, in his terms, "a typical white woman," but he does not come from the hood. They had to get him to rehearse to pronounce "Selma" the right way when he went down there. (interruption) Well, that's just it. (interruption)

Well, Snerdley wants to know, "What is it that makes Don Lemon think that Obama's responsibility is first to black kids and not white kids? Because he didn't come from where white kids come from, because he came from where black kids come from. So he's got to, I guess, give something back?" (interruption)

This is my point. I warned everybody that this presidency was gonna end up being divisive, not unifying. That's not an inclusive message at all. That is an exclusionary role that Don Lemon is advocating Obama play as president. (interruption) There it is. Everything you need to know about the media coverage, it's right there in that bite.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: You know, ladies and gentlemen, it's interesting here. I want to play this bite again, 'cause it contains everything you need to know. This describes everything anybody needs to know about the media and the way Obama is viewed, covered, reported on. Even Mediaite -- which is sort of a media review or analysis site. They sit there and they kind of repeat the highlights of what happened in the media all over the place.

It's leftist oriented, as everything in the media is, but even their headline on this Don Lemon sound bite that we just played is this: "CNN's Don Lemon: Yesterday Obama 'Became the Black President,'" and that's right, according to Don Lemon, the black president. From the article: "CNN anchor Don Lemon became visibly emotional on Thursday after President Barack Obama announced an initiative aimed at helping minority youth to graduate from high school and train for careers.

"On Friday, Lemon expanded on his impressions, telling CNN anchor [the Limbaugh Stalker] Carol Costello that Obama 'became the black president' in that moment." See, he wasn't the black president until that. See, up 'til now, Obama hasn't been showing the proper favoritism. But now, since Obama doesn't have to worry about these conservative racist bigots anymore, 'cause he doesn't have to run for reelection, now he can do what he really wants to do.

He can do what he should have been doing all along. He can do what he's always wanted to do and reach out and favor the black population -- and it's about damn time, they think. This is exactly why he was elected, to help the black population. Now, you might be thinking, "What would happen if Bush or Romney -- take your pick of any Republican president -- said, 'Today I'm going to have a brother's keeper's program aimed specifically at our white children'?"

There would be national outcry. "How dare you!" Do not be sure that this bunch wouldn't also do that, if they're gonna do a black-only outreach, up-reach. I'm not predicting it, but let me ask: Would you be surprised if you heard somebody in this Regime say that we were going to have a program designed to teach young white children about racism and its evils and do our best to eradicate it from the way they think?

That would not surprise me at all if this Regime did that. Now, here's what everybody needs to know. The reason this is being done, and the reason Don Lemon's applauded, is because blacks have been disadvantaged from the days of the founding. This has been a white-dominated culture, and this is long overdue. This favoritism is needed to finally even and level the playing field, because this is evidence of how unjust and unequal this country's been.

So we are going to spend a little time on this brother's keepers program for minority kids to help them overcome the bigoted racist discrimination they face every day in this country. That is what's being applauded. (interruption) What's the question? (interruption) Yes. Mmm-hmm. Mmm-hmm. (interruption) No idea. I don't know. Snerdley wants to know, "Do you think most black kids would prefer this program or an economy creating jobs?" I don't have the answer.

In the old days, the answer would be jobs, but you look at teenage black unemployment. What, is in the 40 percents now? Look at the black abortion levels, the rates that we've been talking, 65,000 pregnancies, black pregnancies in New York City in 2012, and 24,000 "survived," if I may put it that way. It's 65,000 black pregnancies in New York City in 2012 and 24,000 births. The others were aborted.

Yeah, there's all that white racism going on out there, folks. These white bigot conservatives are out there sponsoring abortion, right? So we gotta get to the youth of the minority community and we gotta warn them about these white conservatives 'cause they're encouraging what? All this horrible stuff. Here's the Don Lemon sound bite again. Again, this just tells you everything you need to know about how the media.

Ah, hell. There is no media.

From Don Lemon, Everything You Need to Know About How the Left Looks at Obama - The Rush Limbaugh Show
 
Last edited:

Why do you people listen to Palin on this broad? I really don't understand how one could be so dense to admire Palin. It blows my mind. She is an idiot. Like the worst kind of political idiot. Probably even worse than Glenn Beck. So what if she made a semi correct prediction about two countries who have always had problems? What else exactly gives her any credibility? Absolutely nothing.

Oh dear, someone was not listening. Sarah made a prediction that Russia would invade the Ukraine if Obama was elected, and it happened.

Who else made this prediction? Not to worry though, I hear President Obama is drawing more red lines in the sand with Putin. :badgrin:

I look at it this way, its the US against Russia and Obama. I say the US still kicks both their arses in the end.
 
Tell me why is it that every news network has given plenty of coverage to Obama's broken promises on ObamaCare? Do you call that protection? No. Obama has always been criticized by the likes of CNN. Why would they just ignore Benghazi?

Fox News is a propaganda machine. Not a news network.

That's just it.

FNC's coverage of things inconvenient to the regime force other networks to delve more into verboten areas or into doing more in depth reporting than they otherwise would. After all, when FNC uncovers something CNN considers big enough they HAVE to give it coverage too or else look bad by comparison.

They all covered Benghazi. But without the continued pressure from Conservative news sources the inconvenient facts would never see the light of day.

the important questions would never get asked.

No more than the perfunctory Senate hearings and the most superficial questions would get asked.

This very Republic DEPENDS on a strong zealous boodhound always alert and always adversarial to a degree, to keep those in power honest.

FNC presents the news and invites you to decide.

The MSM reports what they think gets them the best ratings and pleases the regime and tells you that any other news is teh bunk and that you should only pay attention to what THEY tell you.

That's how we got this bastard in the WH in the first place.

Now you're just rambling.

I can't know where to stop or start when trying to bring you up to speed.

You'll have to excuse any rambling.
 
In 2008 during the Presidential Campaign season, Sarah Palin predicted that Russia would be emboldened by a potential Obama Presidency. In August of that same year, then Senator Obama reacted to the invasion of Georgia (the country) by President Vladmir Putin with a noticeable indifference. Six years later and 10 days ago, the nation of Ukraine suddenly erupted into massive violent and bloody protests after President Yanukovych's government rejected a far-reaching accord with the European Union in November. The bloodiest day was last Thursday. Dozens were killed. Looks like certain people will be eating crow now, as Russia invaded Ukraine and blockaded the Crimean Airport and sent in an additional 2,000 troops to surrounding areas. Sarah Palin was right, and Democrats did indeed mock her for it.


(CNN) - Sarah Palin may be having a bragging rights moment.

In 2008, when she was the GOP vice presidential nominee, Palin questioned in a speech whether then-Sen. Barack Obama would have the foreign policy credentials to handle a scenario in which Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine.

"After the Russian army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence – the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next," she said in Reno, Nevada on October 21, 2008.

The former Alaska governor was happy to highlight her prediction on Friday and scold those who criticized her 2008 comments.

"Yes, I could see this one from Alaska," she said on Facebook. That remark was a reference to a 2008 interview in which Palin argued that Alaska's proximity to Russia helped boost her foreign policy experience.

Palin on Ukraine: I told you so ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
 

Why do you people listen to Palin on this broad? I really don't understand how one could be so dense to admire Palin. It blows my mind. She is an idiot. Like the worst kind of political idiot. Probably even worse than Glenn Beck. So what if she made a semi correct prediction about two countries who have always had problems? What else exactly gives her any credibility? Absolutely nothing.

The things that make her so admirable are her attitude and spirit.

You can educate leftists and Liberals until they are sprouting degrees from all the liberal institutions of higher learning but you can't instill what she has.

It's like a person's skin color.

She is, was and always will be an American classic. You can educate her and she will be just as book smart as any of the people you admire.

But the people you admire will NEVER have what she has no matter what schools you send them to.

Our country's problems don't stem from too much Palin.

They stem from too much of what you want more of.

Liberal mindset. Liberal values. Liberal tendencies. Liberal shortcomings.

Sarah Palin is not burdened by those flaws.

And the people you admire who have those flaws cain't change they spots.

That's a glimpse into our love of Sarah Palin.

She's got it.

You never will.

Those who you admire never will.

And they are the ones who are fucking up America.

Elect Obama get High Drama!

And you love that shit.
 
Last edited:
The average American is not as bright as Sarah Palin.

Who would have thunk it?

Just wait until Obama hears that Putin wants to control the BLACK sea. :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top