Palestinian man shot at close range by Israeli forces in Hebron

[toastman]

The proclaimed state has no agreed territorial borders, or effective control on the territory that it proclaimed.

State of Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Hollie]

Tinmore, the 'declared' state of Palestine has no borders you know

Palestine still has the same international borders that it has had for almost a hundred years.

Your opinion is based on a false premise.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

International law is a sound basis to base opinions upon.

 

[Hollie]

International law is a sound basis to base opinions upon.

Except when subjective application of international law is based upon false premises.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

All of us do not buy into Zionist Supremacism thinking.

We leave such faulty analysis all to the Zionazis of our world.

 

[Hollie]

All of us do not buy into Zionist Supremacism thinking.

We leave such faulty analysis all to the Zionazis of our world.

Similarly, few of us buy into your rabid hatreds which leave you stuttering and mumbling with only worn out "Zionazi" slogans.

You really are an intellectual and emotional cripple.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Human rights groups have been documenting Israels crimes in her Occupation of Palestine for decades now.

What the story in the OP represents is one more of those voluminous crimes against humanity that defines Zionism in Palestine today.

Zionism is intentional shooting of unarmed and defenseless men and women and children, point blank, at close range, in the back, burning them to death with white phosphorors, all of those descriptions define Zionism in Palestine today.

 

[Hollie]

Human rights groups have been documenting Israels crimes in her Occupation of Palestine for decades now.

What the story in the OP represents is one more of those voluminous crimes against humanity thst defines Zionism.

I see you have abandoned your false and unsupportable "international law" claim. That was to be expected. It's actually comical to watch you back pedal when your false claims are ridiculed as nonsensical.

You have now decided to pursue your usual tactic of launching into hysterical "zionist" babbling. That also was expected. Silly "Zionazi" slogans, post after post, got old a long time ago, dear.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Human rights groups have been documenting Israels crimes in her Occupation of Palestine for decades now.

What the story in the OP represents is one more of those voluminous crimes against humanity thst defines Zionism.

I see you have abandoned your false and unsupportable "international law" claim. That was to be expected. It's actually comical to watch you back pedal when your false claims are ridiculed as nonsensical.

You have now decided to pursue your usual tactic of launching into hysterical "zionist" babbling. That also was expected. Silly "Zionazi" slogans, post after post, got old a long time ago, dear.

She or he will now start in her copy and paste mode, post after post, with a few Youtube videos for good measure.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

I have abandoned no claims.

Israel continues to occupy Palestinian lands in violation of intl law.

And Israel contunues crimes against civilians.

 

[Hollie]

I have abandoned no claims.

Israel continues to occupy Palestinian lands in violation of intl law.

And Israel contunues crimes against civilians.

How are "Palestinian lands" being occupied when "Palestinians" are a 1960's invention of Yassis Arafat?

"Palestinians" are an invented people occupying lands as squatters.

 

[toastman]

All of us do not buy into Zionist Supremacism thinking.

We leave such faulty analysis all to the Zionazis of our world.

Who's 'we' ?

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

78. The Court would observe that, under customary international law as reflected (see paragraph 89 below) in Article 42 of the Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land annexed to the Fourth Hague Convention of 18 October 1907 (hereinafter "the Hague Regulations of 1907"), territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army, and the occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.The territories situated between the Green Line (see paragraph 72 above) and the former eastern boundary of Palestine under the Mandate were occupied by Israel in 1967 during the armed conflict between Israel and Jordan. Under customary international law, these were therefore occupied territories in which Israel had the status of occupying Power. Subsequent events in these territories, as described in paragraphs 75 to 77 above, have done nothing to alter this situation. All these territories (including East Jerusalem) remain occupied territories and Israel has continued to have the status of occupying Power.*


Study Guide: legal status of territories and Jerusalem

 

[irosie91]

So? I do recall that the US occupied Japan in parts of Germany----In fact I had
a somewhat "intimate" relationship" with injured and sick personnel---over
their in divided Berlin-------I do not recall treating babies with slit throats ---justified
by the fact that someone over there did not like the USA military presence. I did
see a USA military person who had been stationed in Saudi arabia----I hope that
the USA takes MORE care in protecting them from the filth sherri endorses

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Much very good discussion of intl law in The International Court of Justice Opinion on The Wall, from 2004.

On Mandates and the trust situation incorporated in Mandates:


The Court recalls that in its Advisory Opinion on the*International Status of South West Africa, speaking of mandates in general, it observed that "The Mandate was created, in the interest of the inhabitants of the territory, and of humanity in general, as an international institution with an international object a sacred trust of civilization." (I.C.J. Reports 1950, p. 132.) The Court also held in this regard that "two principles were considered to be of paramount importance: the principle of non annexation and the principle that the well being and development of . . . peoples [not yet able to govern themselves] form[ed] 'a sacred trust of civilization'" (ibid., p. 131).

Study Guide: legal status of territories and Jerusalem

Significant point, Mandate Authorities hold land within Mandates at all times in a Trust relationship, holding the land for the benefit of the true owners. AT no time, does the Mandate Authority possess sovereignty rights in the land. Nor do they ever possess the authority to give the lands to others, like members of their own people or colonist settlers.

 

[MHunterB]

Human rights groups have been documenting Israels crimes in her Occupation of Palestine for decades now.

What the story in the OP represents is one more of those voluminous crimes against humanity that defines Zionism in Palestine today.

Zionism is intentional shooting of unarmed and defenseless men and women and children, point blank, at close range, in the back, burning them to death with white phosphorors, all of those descriptions define Zionism in Palestine today.

More like they define the boundless hatred and the psychosis of the sherriliar's bigotry.....half of it is pure fiction, and the rest is malicious exaggeration.

A pity that the l'il sherrithing doesn't want to DISCUSS anything, only to keep spewing its venomous hate at a 'Zionism' which hardly exists outside of the extremist blogstains the sherriliar obsessively reads.

 

[MHunterB]

All of us do not buy into Zionist Supremacism thinking.

We leave such faulty analysis all to the Zionazis of our world.

Who's 'we' ?

Who knows, who cares? It's obvious from the annoying lies it tells that the sherriliar is an asinine extremist whose only wish is to flame anyone who doesn't hate Israel like it does. We've seen it 'thank' posts by blatant Nazi-sucking trolls no matter how vile or insane: nothing matters to the sherrifilth. It would probably forgive anyone any sin or crime if they screeched against Israel. Fats or truth don't matter, justice doesn't matter - only attacking Israel.

It may not be an actual Nazi itself - but the difference is so miniscule as to be irrelevant.

 

[MHunterB]

Your opinion is based on false premise.

You are using Israel's propaganda version.

What opinion? Everything I said is true

On the other hand, YOUR 'opinion' is based on nothing because you know Palestinians don't have a country. Palestinians territories is what it's called, and you know that.

So again, Palestinians approach the fence because they are trying to stir up trouble and get Israel to fire back. Poke the bear enough times and eventually he will bite back.

The League of Nations determined that Palestine was a newly created state according to applicable post war treaties.

Where do you get your opinion?

Oh, and you have documentation of that assertion? And how does that carry through to today? The LoN had no authority to create a state: when did the Palestinians declare it, and who was their first PM or President ? What is their monetary unit?

 

[P F Tinmore]

What opinion? Everything I said is true

On the other hand, YOUR 'opinion' is based on nothing because you know Palestinians don't have a country. Palestinians territories is what it's called, and you know that.

So again, Palestinians approach the fence because they are trying to stir up trouble and get Israel to fire back. Poke the bear enough times and eventually he will bite back.

The League of Nations determined that Palestine was a newly created state according to applicable post war treaties.

Where do you get your opinion?

Oh, and you have documentation of that assertion? And how does that carry through to today? The LoN had no authority to create a state: when did the Palestinians declare it, and who was their first PM or President ? What is their monetary unit?

The LoN did not create the state of Palestine. It merely determined that it was created by post war treaties.

 

[toastman]

The League of Nations determined that Palestine was a newly created state according to applicable post war treaties.

Where do you get your opinion?

Oh, and you have documentation of that assertion? And how does that carry through to today? The LoN had no authority to create a state: when did the Palestinians declare it, and who was their first PM or President ? What is their monetary unit?

The LoN did not create the state of Palestine. It merely determined that it was created by post war treaties.

Link?