PA Judge Has Heard Enough From Rudy Giuliani, Cancels Scheduled Evidentiary Hearing

[skews13]

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.

“The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED,” the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly “threatening” phone call.

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn’t see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.

“Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, ‘This is not a fraud case,'” writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn’t actually involve fraud allegations.

Pennsylvania judge has heard enough from Rudy Giuliani -- and cancels scheduled evidentiary hearing

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to...

www.rawstory.com

 

[okfine]

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.

“The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED,” the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly “threatening” phone call.

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn’t see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.

“Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, ‘This is not a fraud case,'” writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn’t actually involve fraud allegations.

Pennsylvania judge has heard enough from Rudy Giuliani -- and cancels scheduled evidentiary hearing

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to...

www.rawstory.com

Giuliani is a washed up "D" list attorney. Wasting the courts time. He deserves the Daily Poke in the Eye Award.

 

[xyz]

He needs to represent Trump in the Southern District.

 

[Rambunctious]

A PA judge?...you mean a PA hack in a black robe...there are higher courts...no worries....

 

[Thunk]

The idiot judge did Rudy a favor.

Now it will go up the chain to the next court and then the USSC

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The quicker this gets to the Supreme Court, the better.

 

[Toro]

A PA judge?...you mean a PA hack in a black robe...there are higher courts...no worries....

you keep believing that nutter

 

[Shawnee_b]

A PA judge?...you mean a PA hack in a black robe...there are higher courts...no worries....

Here, let me fix it a tad.

A PA judge?...you mean a PA liberal ovomit appointed hack in a black robe with nothing underneath and playing with his peepee...there are higher courts...no worries....

 

[mudwhistle]

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.

“The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED,” the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly “threatening” phone call.

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn’t see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.

“Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, ‘This is not a fraud case,'” writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn’t actually involve fraud allegations.

Pennsylvania judge has heard enough from Rudy Giuliani -- and cancels scheduled evidentiary hearing

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to...

www.rawstory.com

Laws or for us pissant Americans.....not for Democrat scum.

 

[Lysistrata]

Who nominated a particular judge should not be an issue, since all presidents, regardless of party, nominate judges. No one can request a judge that was nominated by a president of their favorite political party.

Giuliani said in court that this was not a fraud case. On what issue did Giuliani want to present evidence? The judge included a briefing schedule in his order, albeit a very short one. He just sent the attorneys for both sides back to their desks to elaborate. The last reply brief is due at noon on Friday. Trump's attorneys had until 5 PM today to file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, which Giuliani should have been smart enough to do given the seeming confusion over the issues raised in the current one. The judge did not dismiss the case.

 

[beautress]

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.

“The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED,” the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly “threatening” phone call.

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn’t see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.

“Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, ‘This is not a fraud case,'” writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn’t actually involve fraud allegations.

Pennsylvania judge has heard enough from Rudy Giuliani -- and cancels scheduled evidentiary hearing

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to...

www.rawstory.com

Laws or for us pissant Americans.....not for Democrat scum.

America needs adults in the judiciary, not purile, prepurchased libbiemongers who hate it that their palsey walseys are criminals with big pockets to buy prejudiced and obfuscating judges. That sucker needs to be impeached and removed.

 

[wamose]

The idiot judge did Rudy a favor.

Now it will go up the chain to the next court and then the USSC

Yeah. The sooner they get this out of PA's rigged courts the better.

 

[beautress]

The quicker this gets to the Supreme Court, the better.

The Supremes are last resort means. The caterwauling of the left will be deafening, followed by years of evil disembodiment of the highest courts by a weaponized Hillary Clinton crowd. Look what she pulled on Trump to get rid of him and is still trying.

 

[beagle9]

The idiot judge did Rudy a favor.

Now it will go up the chain to the next court and then the USSC

He had no choice, his slave masters in the DNC made it that way. Must be bad to be a slave.

 

[beagle9]

Briben is the biggest security threat this nation has ever known.

 

[candycorn]

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.

“The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED,” the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly “threatening” phone call.

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn’t see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.

“Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, ‘This is not a fraud case,'” writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn’t actually involve fraud allegations.

Pennsylvania judge has heard enough from Rudy Giuliani -- and cancels scheduled evidentiary hearing

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to...

www.rawstory.com

I was reading a story about this; Rudy hasn't been in federal court since the 1990's and apparently has forgotten how to address a judge.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.

“The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED,” the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly “threatening” phone call.

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn’t see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.

“Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, ‘This is not a fraud case,'” writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn’t actually involve fraud allegations.

Pennsylvania judge has heard enough from Rudy Giuliani -- and cancels scheduled evidentiary hearing

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to...

www.rawstory.com

I was reading a story about this; Rudy hasn't been in federal court since the 1990's and apparently has forgotten how to address a judge.

Ahhhhh. You like the Raiders???....I loved the Raiders for 50 yrs. I loved football for 50 yrs.

Now they can all eat shit and crash in the team plane

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Wonder how Amy will judge this? The Dems knew what a thorn she would be now that that old buzzard croaked.

Bad timing.

They knew she was a problem in this pre planned fraud.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

My God. They voted for a man who taught his son to fuck his dead brothers wife while he was still warm.

Then taught him to fuck his 13 yr old niece while taping and tagging.

 

[konradv]

Wonder how Amy will judge this? The Dems knew what a thorn she would be now that that old buzzard croaked. Bad timing. They knew she was a problem in this pre planned fraud.

Amy's only a problem for the Dems, if she overlooks the lack of evidence on Trump's side. If she does, then she's the example of the pre-planned fraud.