Our Hero, General Patton on Moscow. Everyone who ever said he was wrong needs to apologize. Extremely prophetic words !

The American public was weary of war by 1945.
Resolve and support to attack Russia/USSR wasn't there.
Plus had Japan and the PTO to wrap up.
Stalin/Russia would have had to attack the USA for the two to go to war with each other, if that.
USA would have used it's growing arsenal of atomic bombs on Russia and the fallout might have been hazardous to many others on the planet.
 
The American public was weary of war by 1945.
Resolve and support to attack Russia/USSR wasn't there.
Plus had Japan and the PTO to wrap up.
Stalin/Russia would have had to attack the USA for the two to go to war with each other, if that.
USA would have used it's growing arsenal of atomic bombs on Russia and the fallout might have been hazardous to many others on the planet.

Churchill had a good plan , we´d follow it​

 

Our Hero, General Patton on Moscow. Everyone who ever said he was wrong needs to apologize. Extremely prophetic words !​



He was wrong. If WW3 started in 1945, here's what would have happened.

Instead of joining the Pacific War, the USSR would have signed an alliance with Japan. Bye-bye China when that happened.

The USSR had a military force in Europe far greater than what the US and UK had. The UK also had the problem in that they were entirely reliant on troops from India at that point, who had only signed on under the promise of independence after the war.
 
USSR would have signed an alliance with Japan. Bye-bye China when that happened.
crap.ru USA produced more than 50% of the world GDP, without our food Moscow´d stave to death. we´d f u ck both empires easy in 1945 easy

i dont made USA made a deal with Japan and bomb Moscow with nukes instead , Japan could keep Northern Manchuria I dont mind
 
He was wrong. If WW3 started in 1945, here's what would have happened.

Instead of joining the Pacific War, the USSR would have signed an alliance with Japan. Bye-bye China when that happened.

The USSR had a military force in Europe far greater than what the US and UK had. The UK also had the problem in that they were entirely reliant on troops from India at that point, who had only signed on under the promise of independence after the war.
LOL!

You Moon Bats don't know any more about History than you know about Economics, Biology, Climate Science, Ethics or the Constitution.
 
He was wrong. If WW3 started in 1945, here's what would have happened.

Instead of joining the Pacific War, the USSR would have signed an alliance with Japan. Bye-bye China when that happened.

The USSR had a military force in Europe far greater than what the US and UK had. The UK also had the problem in that they were entirely reliant on troops from India at that point, who had only signed on under the promise of independence after the war.
Tell us about the Russian Navy!!
 
After taking over German armaments production, the USA would have been mass producing jet fighters late Fall 1945. All those JStalin Heavy Tanks would have been target practice, well they were already. US Army Air Force owned the skies.

To his credit, Stalin controlled FDR and Truman Administration's. Have to give him credit for that
 
After taking over German armaments production, the USA would have been mass producing jet fighters late Fall 1945. All those JStalin Heavy Tanks would have been target practice, well they were already. US Army Air Force owned the skies.

To his credit, Stalin controlled FDR and Truman Administration's. Have to give him credit for that
dont forget about :




After the Second World War, soldiers from across the Baltics who had fought on both sides of the war disappeared into the forests to wage Europe's bloodiest guerrilla war against the occupying Soviet forces. This short docu drama includes interviews with former partisan fighters and those who supported them and dramatic battle scene recreations and interviews with modern-day Special Forces of Lithuania, the direct descendants of the Forest Brothers.
 
Last edited:
dont forget about :

Patton said that the end of WWII was a strategic failure for the WAllies as it left great European capitals in the hands of the descents of Ghengis Khan
 
Plus Stalin loses his access to Allied plans. No more Ultra
koba and his bloody gangleaders killed literally all young Muscovites in 1945. they took in the slaves from stans, who have never seen a car or plane , our high-tech armies ´d f u c k over the lousy hordes of the rapists and looters in the weeks

 
Patton said that the end of WWII was a strategic failure for the WAllies as it left great European capitals in the hands of the descents of Ghengis Khan
and he was 120 % right, even according K Marx

K. Marx: The Mongolian Origins of Muscovite Power. The policy of the first Ruriks is completely distinguished from that of modern Muscovy ... The Gothic period constitutes for Muscovy only a chapter of Germanic invasions ... ...the terrifying apparition of Genghis Khan. The origin of Muscovy lies in the bloody degradation of Mongolian slavery and not in the rude heroism of the Norman epoch. Modern "Russia" is nothing but a transfigured Muscovy ... Ivan Kalita, the First [4], and Ivan III, called the Great, incarnate, [in] the one, the growth of Moscow under Tartar domination; [in] the other, Moscow becoming an independent power, thanks to the disappearance of Tartar domination. In the history of these two individuals is summarized the entire Muscovite policy from the moment of its entry upon the historic arena. Ivan Kalita’s whole system may be expressed in a few words: the Machiavellism of the slave who wants to usurp power. His very weakness, his servitude, became for him the driving principle of his strength. Ivan III delivered Moscow from the Tartar yoke, not by a bold and decisive blow, but by the patient work of twenty years. He did not break it, but surreptitiously extricated himself from it. Thus this deliverance bears more resemblance to a natural phenomenon than to a human act. When the Tartar monster was on the point of uttering its last death-rattle, Ivan appeared at its death-bed as a doctor who makes the diagnosis and announces the end, and not a warrior who strikes the coup de grace. Every people appears to have grown in stature when it shakes off a foreign yoke. From Ivan’s hands, Muscovy emerged still more debased. To be convinced of this, it suffices to compare Spain and its struggle against the Arabs with Muscovy and its struggle against the Tartars. It is still interesting today to note to what extent Muscovy endeavored – just like modern Muscovy – to conduct attacks upon the republics. Novgorod and its colonies open up the cycle, the Cossack Republic follows suit, and Poland closes it ... Ivan seems to have wrested from the Mongols the chains which crushed Muscovy only to impose them upon the Moscow colonies .
 
crap.ru USA produced more than 50% of the world GDP, without our food Moscow´d stave to death. we´d f u ck both empires easy in 1945 easy

i dont made USA made a deal with Japan and bomb Moscow with nukes instead , Japan could keep Northern Manchuria I dont mind

You don't mind... most of the world would have at that point.

By 1945, most of the world was weary of war. It's why the British threw Churchill out of power before the ink was dry on VE Day.
 

our hero about you Ivan !


1667334277358.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top