Zone1 Origins

Not at all, I just don't know that existence was the source of all first causes or if it was the result of a cause.
The alternative to believing in an uncaused first cause it an infinite series of cascading causes that has no beginning or "turtles all the way down." It's borderline idiotic.

But the most telling aspect of how you are arguing is you seem to be afraid to even consider exploring the possibility that existence is the source of everything.
 
The alternative to believing in an uncaused first cause it an infinite series of cascading causes that has no beginning or "turtles all the way down." It's borderline idiotic.
Disagree.

But the most telling aspect of how you are arguing is you seem to be afraid to even consider exploring the possibility that existence is the source of everything.
It might well be but I have no real idea what existence is.
 
So comparing their applications is like comparing apples to oranges? Regardless, this is a topic neither you, nor I, nor anyone else can do more than speculate about.
Seriously? Was it really that difficult to understand the Pi is infinite instead of eternal or that the universe expanding into the future is eternal and not infinite. Or that describing existence as an uncaused first cause is eternal?

Because I'm not seeing the problem here. What I am seeing is you throwing out obstacles to keep from exploring the possibility that existence is the source of everything and is uncaused.
 
Disagree.
Great. Then explain how it isn't idiotic.
It might well be but I have no real idea what existence is.
You exist but have no idea of what existence is? Existence is the fact of being, while nature is the description of what that being is like. Ergo nature and existence are inseparable. For example, your behaviors are inseparable from your being.
 
Seriously? Was it really that difficult to understand the Pi is infinite instead of eternal or that the universe expanding into the future is eternal and not infinite. Or that describing existence as an uncaused first cause is eternal?

Because I'm not seeing the problem here. What I am seeing is you throwing out obstacles to keep from exploring the possibility that existence is the source of everything and is uncaused.
I'm not following you down this semantic rabbit hole.
 
I'm not following you down this semantic rabbit hole.
Atheists aren't equipped to ponder origin questions. Atheism is an intellectual dead end because they only know how to criticize what they don't believe. They don't know how to make affirmative arguments because they never had to make an affirmative argument to criticize someone else's affirmative argument. But you guys are awesome at criticizing.
 
I'm not following you down this semantic rabbit hole.
Is it semantics or is it philosophy and logic?

If you are asking about the source of a word's meaning, it is a question of semantics/etymology. If you are asking about the fundamental source of existence, knowledge, or a concept, it is a question of philosophy. And philosophy heavily relies on logic as a fundamental tool for reasoning.

So is your problem with the meaning of words or with logic and reasoning?
 
It's perfectly logical to believe the universe has simply always existed. No first cause.
 
Is it semantics or is it philosophy and logic?

If you are asking about the source of a word's meaning, it is a question of semantics/etymology. If you are asking about the fundamental source of existence, knowledge, or a concept, it is a question of philosophy. And philosophy heavily relies on logic as a fundamental tool for reasoning.

So is your problem with the meaning of words or with logic and reasoning?
Using logic and reasoning in the complete absence of facts.
 
Using logic and reasoning in the complete absence of facts.
You say that like it's a negative but the reality is everything before the universe popped into existence is the realm of philosophy and logic. What facts do you suppose there are besides the laws of nature existed before space and time and that the universe was not created from existing matter?

I thought you weren't going down this rabbit hole?
 
You say that like it's a negative but the reality is everything before the universe popped into existence is the realm of philosophy and logic. What facts do you suppose there are besides the laws of nature existed before space and time and that the universe was not created from existing matter?

I thought you weren't going down this rabbit hole?
I'm not.
 
The funny thing alang1216 is that our discussion started because YOU found it ironic that everything said about God in the video came from the Bible. I offered to answer the question of where God came from by using existence as a proxy for God without using the bible and that still wasn't good enough for you.
 
You can't. You aren't equipped for it.

Apparently you just want to complain about the God of Abraham.

You have no interest in discussing the philosophical aspect of a universe popping into existence that is finely tuned to produce intelligence.
 
The funny thing alang1216 is that our discussion started because YOU found it ironic that everything said about God in the video came from the Bible. I offered to answer the question of where God came from by using existence as a proxy for God without using the bible and that still wasn't good enough for you.
As usual you conflate the Creator with the God of Abraham. It is the later we know only from the Bible.
 
You can't. You aren't equipped for it.
You are correct.

Apparently you just want to complain about the God of Abraham.
I have no complaints, only comments.

You have no interest in discussing the philosophical aspect of a universe popping into existence that is finely tuned to produce intelligence.
I guess it depends on how you define 'intelligence' but, however the universe came to be, it is NOT finely tuned to produce intelligence. Just about every type of life, insects, mammals, reptiles, and dinos, evolved the ability to fly. Even one-celled animals and plants did so. Intelligence like ours is a tiny twig on the tree of life. Horseshoe crabs have been around for 100s of millions of years and are no more intelligent than they ever were.
 
15th post
As usual you conflate the Creator with the God of Abraham. It is the later we know only from the Bible.
I haven't gotten within a hundred miles of mentioning the God of Abraham. I am making an argument that existence is the origin of the material world and that existence is the uncaused first cause.

Rather than have an honest discussion you have been playing games. You must have one fragile psyche to be afraid to explore all sides of this subject.
 
You are correct.


I have no complaints, only comments.


I guess it depends on how you define 'intelligence' but, however the universe came to be, it is NOT finely tuned to produce intelligence. Just about every type of life, insects, mammals, reptiles, and dinos, evolved the ability to fly. Even one-celled animals and plants did so. Intelligence like ours is a tiny twig on the tree of life. Horseshoe crabs have been around for 100s of millions of years and are no more intelligent than they ever were.
All life has some level of sentience and information processing. As life evolved so did intelligence. All of which occurred for logical reasons according to the laws of nature. Matter itself is fine tuned to produce life. We search for intelligent life outside of our planet (i.e. SETI) because we expect to find it because it is widely recognized that the universe is fine tuned to produce intelligence.
 
Just another great mystery. Too many to ponder let alone solve.
 
We search for intelligent life outside of our planet (i.e. SETI) because we expect to find it because it is widely recognized that the universe is fine tuned to produce intelligence.
We search for intelligent life outside of our planet because talking with an alien amoeba would be a waste of time.
 
Back
Top Bottom