Origin of articles in Western European languages

[rupol2000]

by the way, the guitar is also the atribut of the hussars and the Hungarians.

 

[rupol2000]

 

[zaangalewa]

Like any nation.

No.

There were the Aryans - the Media and the Mittanians. But the Parsis are not Aryans.

I fear no one ever had been any Aryan. But if Aryans ever had really existed then they are ancestors of the Persians.

 

[rupol2000]

No.

The concept of a nation automatically implies a population of different origins. So, for example, the Germanic nation consists of Germans (about 10%), and subordinate Celts and Huns

 

[zaangalewa]

Traditional cowboys wore wide trousers.

Hungarians have a cowboy style of clothing

What you see here are not Turkish trousers - which are functionally more a kind of "smoking" for elegant parties or meetings. What you see here is a romantic version of working cloth for hard workers. The "trousers" here are normally Jeans and a kind of leather protection and not a silk-like wide elegant fabric fluttering in the wind.

 

[rupol2000]

I fear no one ever had been any Aryans. But if Aryans ever had really existed then they are ancestors of the Persians.

This has already been discussed. The Mittanians and Medes spoke Aryan languages. The denial of the Aryans is nothing more than clownery.

Persians are not Aryans, there is no reason to consider them Aryans. This is the same invention as attributing Aryanism to the Germans.

By the way, the Germans are also close to the Semites, they have a common ancestor IJ

Haplogroup IJ - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[rupol2000]

What you see here are not Turkish trousers - which are functionally more a kind of "smoking" for elegant parties or meetings. What you see here is a romantic version of working cloth. Then "trousers" here are normally Jeans and a kind of leather protection and not a silk-like wide elegant fabric fluttering in the wind.

I didn’t talk about Turkish trousers. I said about the trousers of American and Hungarian cowboys

 

[zaangalewa]

The concept of a nation automatically implies a population of different origins. So, for example, the Germanic nation consists of Germans (about 10%), and subordinate Celts and Huns

This wrong and/or nonsense DNA analyzes is from the year 1913? And exists the same from the Austrian-Hungarian empire of the same year 1913? Hundred yaers ago existed by the way twice as many Germans as today are existing,

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

zaangalewa
All this confusion comes from the fact that the Germans began to call themselves Aryans. This was even before the Nazis, the anti-scientific term "Indo-Germans" was used there. In fact, the original Germans come from the Corded Ware culture and the Baltic cultures, they were never Aryans. Some modern Germans descend from the Aryans, but these are not historical Germans, but only Celts and Huns who came across the Danube.

It is from the pseudoscientific term "Indo-Germans" that the pseudoscientific term "Indo-Europeans" comes from. This is a ghost people who never existed, and all ancient Indo-European languages come only from Aryan.
This pseudoscientific picture was introduced by Gobineau. Or at least he is the most famous ideologue of "Indo-Germanism"

Once again: the historical Germans are not Aryans, and no one knows what "Indo-Germans" and "Indo-Europeans" are.

The Truth Behind the Idea of the "Dumb Blonde"

That common-sense reading of pre-history explains why so many Nordic words only go back to an original and separate Germanic language and not to the original Aryan language.

What happened was that weak, cowardly, and disorganized Indigenees from a separate race were conquered by a few Aryans and adopted some new words from their conquerors. This explains why the Germanic barbarians were thousands of years behind the Greeks and Romans in civilizational development. The Nazis were a reversion to those pre-Aryan stupid bloodthirsty ancestors.

 

[rupol2000]

This wrong and/or nonsense DNA analyzes is from the year 1913? And exists the same from the Austrian-Hungarian empire of the same year 1913?

I believe this is modern analysis. In 1913, there was no DNA genealogy.

Incidentally, this is fully consistent with the historical picture that we discussed.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The Germans are trying to appropriate the history of the Sarmatians, and they tell tales about how they fought with Rome. In fact, the Rhine Germans were part of Rome, and the eastern ones lived in the forests of historical Prussia, obeyed their women, wore bast shoes and their nobility was engaged in trade.
The heroic sagas were written by the Old Norse peoples, in the Old Norse language, close to the Celtic ones, and the Germans have nothing to do with them.

Why Nazis Could Only Defeat European Cowards

Here's what happened to the inferior Germans who fought the pre-decadence Romans:

Battle of Versellae (101 BC, Northern Italy)

ROMANS: 52,000 well-disciplined troops, led by Marius, Julius Caesar's uncle
GERMANS: 180,000 barbarians in a disorganized mob

ROMAN DEAD: 1,000
FUTURE SWASTICKERS' DEAD: 120,000, plus 60,000 surrendering and sold into slavery

 

[zaangalewa]

I didn’t talk about Turkish trousers. I said about the trousers of American and Hungarian cowboys

You speak nonsense. And you don't see this nonsense with your own eyes - by ignoring concrete information. Unreal situation. Let it be to use alcohol and/or drugs.

 

[rupol2000]

You speak nonsense. And you don't see this nonsense with your own eyes - by ignoring concrete information. Unreal situation. Let it be to use alcohol and/or drugs

If this was the only property, it could be an coincidence. But we have a huge set of coincidences besides clothing: horse breeding, national symbols, political system (unique ONLY for the USA and Austria Hungary), common origin from the region near Altai-Chelyabinsk.

 

[rupol2000]

By the way, I don’t know a single people other than Hungarians and American cowboys, whose vest is an element of traditional clothing.

 

[rupol2000]

concrete information

By the way, those concepts that you manipulate are the ignorance of reality. Nobody knows who the "Türks" are, nobody knows from what people comes the language that is called Türkic and which was imposed on the Central Asians during the Turkization of 1920s, but this is clearly not the same as the Aryan Turan.
They consider Bulgarians to be Turks, but at the same time their language is Slavic lol

 

[zaangalewa]

Never mind. They may not be Semites, but they didn't speak Aryan.

Who for heavens sake spoke "Aryan"? The Aryan language is a hypothetic construct of some scientsts.

 

[zaangalewa]

these are close cultures of the steppe

That's where the Turkisgh tribes came fröm.

 

[zaangalewa]

Khazar. Cossacks call themselves Khazars and they lived only in the territory of the former Khazaria. They were not in Moscow

?

 

[zaangalewa]

I believe this is modern analysis. In 1913, there was no DNA genealogy.

Incidentally, this is fully consistent with the historical picture that we discussed.

Such things are normally nothing else than only stupid nonsense on a high technical level of extreme idiocy.

 

[rupol2000]

And exists the same from the Austrian-Hungarian empire of the same year 1913?

Actually, Austria Hungary was officially a multinational country. At that time, no one except the Pan-Germanists considered it Germanic.