I wish conservatives would remain consistent.
Do they really expect anything more out of Hollywood?
Is this in poor taste? Absolutely.
But it is all about the free market.
Think about Ronald Reagan. He was an actor. HE WAS HOLLYWOOD. What would HE say in his liberal days?
I think everyone here knows. He wouldn't want any PRIOR restraint on what type of humor Hollywood can churn out for the sake of a buck. Sure, we all know that this disease exists. It isn't necessarily making fun of the disease per sea, but it is posing the question, is the most powerful man of the free world absent minded and being controlled. The premise can be made funny.
If a person can not see that, or see the potential humor in that, they are being very partisan, and they are not being able to laugh at life. If we can't laugh at the tragedy of life, all we are left to do is weep. That would make life unbearable.
If people could not feel free to make this movie here, where else could they feel free to make this movie? I remember just a few days ago some conservative was bitching about some guy that was being brought up on trial about being a "holocaust denier." A liberal rightly pointed out the difference that over there in Europe, they are Democracies, here, we have REAL freedom, a Constitutional Republic, liberties by the rule of law.
As Reagan said, if we do not have the freedom to do things here, that freedom will not exist anywhere.
Let these cretins make their slimy picture. Let's see if the market will accept it or reject it.
Earlier in this thread, some poster asked why don't they make a movie about President Clinton? As I pointed out, they already had. But does anyone remember it?
The same will be true about this flick. In ten years, if it doesn't paint Reagan in a good light, it will be forgotten. Sort of like that Thatcher movie that came out a while ago.
That is what freedom is about.