"Only Criminals Carry Guns On Our Streets"--Donald Trump

[Delldude]

As can not carrying.

Unfortunately, it did in this instance.

 

[Churchill]

Dire consequences from a contours not carrying?

What is a "contours"?

 

[Churchill]

Unfortunately, it did in this instance.

Nobody is safe from political death squads, read some books Dull dude.

 

[OODA_Loop]

What is a "contours"?

Sorry auto typo

Dire consequences from LE from not carrying?

 

[Delldude]

Nobody is safe from political death squads, read some books.

I doubt it was his best move, going into a direct action protesting venue while packing, while confronting LEO's.

 

[Churchill]

Sorry auto typo

Dire consequences from LE from not carrying?

Not carrying a gun can lead to dire consequences, I think my statement is very clear. This is why Police carry, it is very dangerous not to do so. This is why millions of Americans carry because it can be unsafe not to do so.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Not carrying a gun can lead to dire consequences, I think my statement is very clear. This is why Police carry, it is very dangerous not to do so.

Agreed. When doing so what is your advice on avoiding confrontations?

 

[Churchill]

I doubt it was his best move, going into a direct action protesting venue while packing, while confronting LEO's.

He was a peaceful protester who was set upon by thugs in uniform. Thugs who pushed a woman over risking a serious injury. Thugs who escalated the situation in a way the local police never would have.

Thugs who disarmed him and then proceeded to execute him with nine bullets.

It's pretty sad to see so many here who are terrified of admitting the truth, so back to you mental gymnastics.

 

[OODA_Loop]

If cop

He was a peaceful protester who was set upon by thugs in uniform. Thugs who pushed a woman over risking a serious injury. Thugs who escalated the situation in a way the local police never would have.

Thugs who disarmed him and then proceeded to execute him with nine bullets.

If cops are hands on with someone is it legal to interfere as a white knight?

Even if the cops are wrong?

 

[PeterPilot]

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Well, he did committed a criminal act that cost him his life.

What was the criminal act committed by the nurse? Attempting to give aid to a person shoved to the ground by brownshirts?

 

[Delldude]

This is why Police carry, it is very dangerous not to do so.

Police carry from being in direct contact with very dangerous people more often than not.

He was a peaceful protester who was set upon by thugs in uniform. Thugs who pushed a woman over risking a serious injury. Thugs who escalated the situation in a way the local police never would have.

Peaceful protestor there with other agitators. They were ordered off the street, after repeated orders. I guess they should have asked for a couple minutes while they considered the lawful orders.

Thugs who disarmed him and then proceeded to execute him with nine bullets.

No one was executed and you know it. Quite funny you pursue than line of flawed thinking.
Agent saw a gun, exclaimed 'gun', pulled gun from perp's holster, it unexplainably discharged and agents responded to what they perceived as shots fired at them. Tragic for all.

 

[Churchill]

If cops are hands on with someone is it legal to interfere as a white knight?

When did helping a woman who's been pushed off her feet on any icy road, become interference?

Answer when men become cowards.

Even if the cops are wrong?

Not in the US any more, extra judicial execution is the new way.

 

[liarintheWH]

Can we get this trash fake candy**** thread moved to conspiracy theories?

Thanks

 

[leftwinger]

Out west you would be surprised how many carry handguns in their pocket during work hours. They walk in back doors with AR-15 for show and tell to each other. No one has ever been harmed. Few break in to inflict mayhem. Petty theft is low....very low. Mexicans may climb a fence cutting thru the parking lot but they are on cameraman right away. If outside vandalism becomes too much from the tortilla factory....then a sign goes up. In English. That usually does it. Or send out the arms.

 

[leftwinger]

Four came thru. Three Mexican bigger chicks stepped on the Electical light box to go over the wall. They scale walls at 225lbs like a teenager BTW.

Then big heavy 300lb mexican guy steps up (~330PM on a workday). He busts the box from the wall. Doesn't stop him, dos chicks are waiting. He goes over inside shipping gate and first climbs the gate to the wall and tumbles over like a cartoon

Make the West Mexico again Stain say. Some of us live it.

 

[OODA_Loop]

When did helping a woman who's been pushed off her feet on any icy road, become interference?

Answer when men become cowards.

Not in the US any more, extra judicial execution is the new way.

When you interfere with LE operations.

Can you just put yourself in between LE and someone you feel isn’t being treated justly by them? Even if you’re right?

 

[sartre play]

A comment he shouldn't have made, however let's take it in the likely context he meant it.

He likely meant, that if you show up during these aggressive and outrageous street demonstrations with a gun, you're likely looking for criminal activity.

Now your doing the thinking for the president?

 

[Churchill]

Police carry from being in direct contact with very dangerous people more often than not.

Police carry all the time even when not on duty sometimes eve when they visit schools.

Peaceful protestor there with other agitators. They were ordered off the street, after repeated orders. I guess they should have asked for a couple minutes while they considered the lawful orders.

Its a public road, ordering people off the street is a violation of their 1st amendment rights, Pretti was not blocking or obstructing, he even waved on traffic to emphasize that.

No one was executed and you know it.

No, firing nine bullets into an unarmed man lying on the ground is an execution, once they began firing they intended to kill him, that's the only scenario where that many shots are fired, when the intent is to kill.

Quite funny you pursue than line of flawed thinking.
Agent saw a gun, exclaimed 'gun', pulled gun from perp's holster, it unexplainably discharged and agents responded to what they perceived as shots fired at them. Tragic for all.

That was a 1,300 dollar handgun, if the agent mishandled it then he should not be allowed to carry until he receives training. If fellow officers shot Pretti because they panicked and got it all wrong then they should face charges and be disarmed themselves.

People expect armed officers to know how to handle guns, if they do not then there's a problem as it puts everyone of us in danger.

Do you still claim Pretti brandished his gun? Do you still claim Pretti intended to massacre ICE officers?

Why are you GOP magats such fans of big government all of a sudden?

 

[Delldude]

Its a public road, ordering people off the street is a violation of their 1st amendment rights, Pretti was not blocking or obstructing, he even waved on traffic to emphasize that.

Not obeying a lawful order by ICE is obstructing.

That was a 1,300 dollar handgun, if the agent mishandled it then he should not be allowed to carry until he receives training. If fellow officers shot Pretti because they panicked and got it all wrong then they should face charges.

That type handgun is known to discharge accidentally.

No, firing nine bullets into an unarmed man lying on the ground is an execution, once they began firing they intended to kill him, that's the only scenario where that many shots are fired, when the intent is to kill.

That's the police response when they have been fired on. You can argue all day he didn't fire on them, the agents right there obviously thought differently.

Do you still claim Pretti brandished his gun? Do you still claim Pretti intended to massacre ICE officers?

Tell ya what, post any comments I made inferring that.

Jan 17th, eh?

 

[Churchill]

Not obeying a lawful order by ICE is obstructing.

That type handgun is known to discharge accidentally.

Perhaps the officer who removed Pretti's gun should have been aware of that. Besides even if there is truth to that claim how do you know the officer didn't simply mishandle it? how do you know he didn't assume there was no round chambered or something?

I also just did a bit of research on the P320 issue and yes it does have a problem, but do you know exactly what that problem is?

That's the police response when they have been fired on. You can argue all day he didn't fire on them, the agents right there obviously thought differently.

How do you know what they thought? did they tell you?

Tell ya what, post any comments I made inferring that.

I assumed you trusted those in charge like Noem and Bovino, was I wrong to assume that?

It's clear that trump doesn't trust them much anymore.

Jan 17th, eh?