One of the main objectives of our Constitution

You could conclude something intelligent and reasonable, instead.
Well, perhaps the reason is that you're afraid to answer, perhaps even ashamed if that were possible for you.
Brit twits are notoriously unintelligent and illogical, though.
The signatories of your constitution were all from English families.
Sucks to be you, Hemlock Homeless.
Yes, a strange Americanism "sucks" never made sense to me why that word is used that way, it's pretty dumb as is the oft heard illogical phrase "I could care less".
 
And r, perhaps, you’re just a douchebag troll. By golly. That’s it!

Why would one, you quiff?

No shit, asshole.

Not exactly full of breaking news. You idiot.
You still here? You've been missing some interesting conversations, but what's new...

 
View attachment 1050446

If one studies the Constitution and comprehends it, then the above meme is self-evidently correct.

To whatever extent any of our liberals wish to contest the truth of what that meme says, the only thing your argument demonstrates is that you don’t grasp the Constitution.
Liberals really don't want to acknowledge this. It interferes with theirs dreams of ubiquitous government.
 
Liberals really don't want to acknowledge this. It interferes with theirs dreams of ubiquitous government.
It's mostly rational people who don't acknowledge the logic of meme arguments. :lol:

When we're done with the silly pageantry and propaganda and make believe, white women were citizens, were they not? The Constitution didn't allow the government and society to constrain them?
 
Dildos like you find loose shit “interesting.”
Speaking of your pet topic Dildo's I just mailed this to you, Merry Xmas.

1735055628017.webp
 
Wrong.
The Founders did not trust a federal level government after the problems they had with the British government.
The constantly said so, and created the Articles of Confederation first, as a trial in setting such extreme limits on the federal government, that it was totally unworkable.
The Constitution was only slightly more lax in allowing the federal government power, but still was intended to be strongly restricted.
The obvious example is that there was at first to be no standing federal army, and even in the Civil War, it was still the states that owned, armed, uniformed, and paid the different divisions that were temporarily put under federal control.

There was no "federal level" in the British Government. D'Oh!

And your understanding of the facts in early USA are astoundingly ignorant
 
What?

That is totally wrong.
The OP claimed "the US constitution is meant to restrain government".
You have it backwards.
you obviously have no idea what anyone - including yourself, are talking about here
 
Back
Top Bottom