So the "war on terror" is actually a "holy crusade against Islam" according to you? Has anyone told this to the American troops who are Muslims? Because none of them appear to be aware of this "crusade" of yours. For that matter how much support do you imagine the general public is going to have when they find out all of these trillions of their taxpayer dollars have been wasted trying to eliminate the religion that 1.5 billion people worldwide believe in. How much is it going to cost them to wage a war against 21% of the entire human race? Furthermore what makes you believe that you could ever win a war against a religion that outnumbers the entire US population by 5:1? Massacres on the scale you are advocating would require all kinds of WMDs. What makes you believe that the rest of the world is just going to stand by and allow this to happen? Don't forget that there are NATO nations with their own Muslim populations. Basically you are inciting a world war.
First of all yes, the war on terror is specifically against the people who follow a fundamentalist view of Islam who commit acts of terror in the name of their religion for the specific purpose of destroying the freedom you enjoy. Do you really think it is irrelevant that the people who have openly declared war on western society are Muslims inspired by their religion?
How do you suppose the war on terror is ever going to end without defeating their form of religion and extirpating their false claim to moral authority based on those religious beliefs?
The acts of terror to which you refer are by definition political acts, not religious ones. You're dropping into the same logical abyss that RGS is living in: dicto simpliciter. That fallacy forces us to ignore all the other terrorists who happen to follow other religions, or no religion at all, in favor of the designated hate group who happen to follow Islam. And that, by the figures in my last link, would force us to ignore at least 94% of all terrorism, including all the Eric Rudolphs, the Tim McVeighs, the Scott Roeders and the Ted Kaczynskis, just to name a few, who don't happen to qualify under the rules of 21st century Crusade. So no, the war on terror is NOT specifically against the people who follow a fundamentalist view of Islam, or any other religion. It's against the people who follow a fundamentalist view of using violence to get their way. Period.
Sheeeesh.
It is ironic though, that the same voices who correctly point the finger of primitivity at public beheadings, treatment of women and the like, then nevertheless turn around and themselves invoke the spirit of the Crusades of a thousand years past.
As I keep saying.... Having it both ways: priceless.
You do realize that a fundamentalist view of Islam demands violence?
Sheesh yourself.
And no I am not suggesting any sort of medieval crusade. Pay attention.
I am suggesting a way for all the bullshit to end without innocent bloodshed whether it is found in Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Atheism.
Who could possibly object to ridding the world of the few liars who deceive and mislead the rest of the population and in the process exposing the truth freeing the billions of captives held in dungeons of religious deceit?
If someone did would it be a great mystery why?