Once again, another active shooter.

[Marion Morrison]

Alright assholes, who slacked on their thoughts and prayers?!

Might have been me....so sorry there.

Who does a doublewide leftist diesel dyke pray to?

And I accept your concession on this thread topic.

I asked a question. I didn't say I conceded.

Who do you pray to?

 

[Dale Smith]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

How many more acts, statutes, codes and ordinances need to be put in place along with the hundreds of others already in place? My right to protect me and mine doesn't come from a corporate entity that believes that it can bestow "privileges" on it's debt slaves. Many of these "mass shootings" are orchestrated events in order to sway the uneducated masses into accepting more draconian rules and many of us can see right through it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Go **** yourself, commie retard.

 

[Marion Morrison]

They're reporting it was a co-worker, and he used a pistol. So what are we supposed to take away from this exactly?

Apparently we should take away the fact that gun free zones create the climate for mass murder, if we are to believe 2aguy.

STFU, Cum Catcher. Did you have a point, or not?

 

[hunarcy]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

I am not confused. People like you say we have to get rid of firearms after such incidents, but this (and your response) shows even you know such laws DON'T accomplish what is claimed and will be totally ineffective. We have laws against murder that are very effective if enforced. Why not focus on them rather than gun "control", which will control nothing.

 

[JimH52]

THIS JUST IN!​

No one shot at the Southern Border!

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Alright assholes, who slacked on their thoughts and prayers?!

God hating Democrats?

 

[Brain357]

Thanks gun culture. Only the US suffers from regular mass shootings...

 

[Rustic]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Mod Edit: Added a link

Aurora Shooting Updates: Multiple People Killed and Wounded in Illinois

 

[Brain357]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

I am not confused. People like you say we have to get rid of firearms after such incidents, but this (and your response) shows even you know such laws DON'T accomplish what is claimed and will be totally ineffective. We have laws against murder that are very effective if enforced. Why not focus on them rather than gun "control", which will control nothing.

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have this problem...

 

[Rustic]

Thanks gun culture. Only the US suffers from regular mass shootings...

Lol
Quit falling down the well

 

[Rustic]

Have they ID'd the shooter ?
Is it David Hogg ?

David Hogg is nursing her period current... rumor has it

 

[Rustic]

What is a inactive shooter?

Several above who have mocked this thread, and the others who hope for a civil war (no war is civil).

 

[Rustic]

How many people were shot at the southern border today....you know....the site of the National Emergency?

 

[Rustic]

THIS JUST IN!​

No one shot at the Southern Border!

Hopefully some illegal aliens start getting shot

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

 

[Rustic]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

I am not confused. People like you say we have to get rid of firearms after such incidents, but this (and your response) shows even you know such laws DON'T accomplish what is claimed and will be totally ineffective. We have laws against murder that are very effective if enforced. Why not focus on them rather than gun "control", which will control nothing.

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have this problem...

Irrelevant

 

[Rustic]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

Lol
Private firearm ownership has nothing to do with crime... We have no criminal control in this country you stupid ass ************

 

[MisterBeale]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

What was the speed limit on the Bundesautobahn again?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

Anyone surprised? [Aurora, IL]

I am surprised. I thought the draconian anti-gun laws of Illinois were supposed to prevent such things.

No, you're confused, gun laws do not prevent such events, no more than speed limits prevent speeding. If you need to have someone explain 1) why speed laws do not prevent speeders, and 2) why we need speed limits please ask.

I am not confused. People like you say we have to get rid of firearms after such incidents, but this (and your response) shows even you know such laws DON'T accomplish what is claimed and will be totally ineffective. We have laws against murder that are very effective if enforced. Why not focus on them rather than gun "control", which will control nothing.

Funny how countries with strong gun control don’t have this problem...

And yet you continue to fail to expand on what constitutes ‘strong’ gun control.