So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???
I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.
Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.
We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.
Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.
It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...
So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....
