Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did he have a right to defy a grand jury subpoena seeking the return of documents that had been classified?
Of course you do! You just don’t want to admit it.I don’t know.
They may negotiate for specific things, like Trump wanting the love letters from the North Korean dictator....the archives would make a duplicate, either for Trump or themselves.Normally, former presidents negotiate for years on documents, right?
Good luck with that.The good news here is, someday, Republicans will win back the White House and we can prosecute Joe Biden with impunity ... long past time we held our elected officials responsible for their actions ...
It seems that a conspiracy was afoot from at least January 20, 2021, from this filing.
Reminder: All Presidents since Reagan, who was the first former President covered by the PRA, have spent years negotiating the return of documents, including classified ones.
See the Obama situation in which 18 months after he left office his Foundation agreed to pay the Archive to retrieve and remove to proper storage documents from a warehouse in Chicago which included classified documents.
The attack on Trump began at least as early as January 20, 2021, the day Biden was sworn in.
Yea, meaning ANYONE for 6 or 7 years could read through them. Biden knew he had them, documents don't walk into the garage on their own.
He disclosed them because his attorney told him you're going to prison if you're caught with them.
The fact is, Biden did JUST what Trump did, when Biden NEVER had the right to keep them. Trump DID. But since you love Biden and hate Trump, you make ENDLESS EXCUSES to Biden's breaking the law and want to hang Trump for doing much less as he WAS president and COULD declassify anything and everything at a moments notice. Biden NEVER could.
Here's the part not reported. Before Obama left office he funded NARA at record levels to handle his documents. While Obama had a huge team of archivists working for his team, NARA offered Trump zero archivists to work with his team. The guy in charge was a total Obamite and remained so through Trump's years. Yes, this was a set up.
Of course you do! You just don’t want to admit it.
The reason you bring up Hunter and Joe is because you don’t want to admit that the evidence strongly suggests committed very serious felonies.
Start a different thread to discuss it, because all you’re doing is trying to change the topic of this discussion from Trump’s obstruction of justice, whose indictment we don’t get to hear your feelings about.Ok, for the sake of argument, let’s say he did. Now, what are your feelings about Joe and Hunter?
But they waited how many years to get documents back from Biden that he was NEVER entitled to have? 6, 7 years I believe?
But we know, you don't think its a threat to national security to have top secret documents unsecured in a garage with a 67 Corvette that ANYONE had access to who went into that house. Just Trump, with documents at Mar a Lago that were kept under lock and key and under strict security at all times. Yea, THOSE are the documents we are worried about.
It seems that a conspiracy was afoot from at least January 20, 2021, from this filing.
Reminder: All Presidents since Reagan, who was the first former President covered by the PRA, have spent years negotiating the return of documents, including classified ones.
See the Obama situation in which 18 months after he left office his Foundation agreed to pay the Archive to retrieve and remove to proper storage documents from a warehouse in Chicago which included classified documents.
The attack on Trump began at least as early as January 20, 2021, the day Biden was sworn in.
Hey, Trailer Trash, there is a whole list of laws and regulations and procedures for declassifying documents, and "I declassified them with my mind" is not one of them.No, there is no procedure dictated by LAW that a president must follow to declassify documents. It seems like laws only matter to you when they benefit Democrats.
He had evidence and specifically stated why he didn’t reccommdned indictment. It was because a jury would likely find him a doddering old fool like the rest of us sane people in this country. Doddering old fools can often be relieved from intent.
You are right, I don't care, because the documents in question were about internal deliberations on Afghan Policy. There wasn't actually a state secret in there.. unlike the stuff Trump stole, which had serious implications.Biden did NOT return the documents after reading excerpts from them to his biographer, years prior. You are lying and you know it, but you don’t care.
If the laws were equally applied, Hunter would have been let off with just paying his back taxes and would have lost his gun. That's how the government handles these things 99% of the time.I don’t know. Did Hunter have the right to deny a congressional subpoena?
Also, I noticed you skipped over the problem with Biden knowing that he had classified documents and not turning them over until years later.
The reason I bring up Hunter and Joe is because laws should be equally applied. They clearly are not when Democrats are calling the shots.
There's a minor problem with DBAs characterization. Biden was reading from his personal diary, not from classified documents. The problem is that the DoJ has accepted that presidential (and by extension vice presidential) diaries can contain classified information and remain in possession of the former office holder. It's entirely rational that we change that policy, but you can't necessarily foist that on people retrospectively without warning them.You are right, I don't care, because the documents in question were about internal deliberations on Afghan Policy. There wasn't actually a state secret in there.. unlike the stuff Trump stole, which had serious implications.
Thanks for that.There's a minor problem with DBAs characterization. Biden was reading from his personal diary, not from classified documents. The problem is that the DoJ has accepted that presidential (and by extension vice presidential) diaries can contain classified information and remain in possession of the former office holder. It's entirely rational that we change that policy, but you can't necessarily foist that on people retrospectively without warning them.
The point is we do not believe Progs. When you do not believe it then there is a serious mistrust in those who govern. So, whatever happens to Trump it will be just an act of tyranny from a dictatorship leaning party.Start a different thread to discuss it, because all you’re doing is trying to change the topic of this discussion from Trump’s obstruction of justice, whose indictment we don’t get to hear your feelings about.
Start a different thread to discuss it, because all you’re doing is trying to change the topic of this discussion from Trump’s obstruction of justice, whose indictment we don’t get to hear your feelings about.
Obviously there is something to discuss since you can’t even bring yourself to have an opinion on whether Trump obstructed justice by hiding documents in violation of the grand jury subpoena.There is nothing to discuss really. Just admit there is a two tier justice system and Democrats are fine with it as long as it benefits them.
