" On the ash heap of History "

[Foolardi]

As the best example of a Presidency in my Lifetime { that of
Ronald Reagan } was known to utter.
That is what Biden faces.His Presidency will be on the ash heap
of History as far as most any things American and Truthful.
Biden an uncontrolled Liar and spreader of outright slander.
Because it's all his comtrollers know or care to know.
Just Lie! Lie! Lie! { sometimes multiple times a day }.
The Obama way of doing things.Meanining never change course, or
even remotely try to affect congeniality.Just double or triple down
as if rousing Lucifer to prove his mettle.
Now with definitive proof as to what Party shouts the loudest
and breaks the law the most.It's the Party of Abortion.Plus Abortion
on Demand.The party who has no qualms about Doxing members
of the Supreme Court or having a Scotus Draft opinion leaked.
Then when asked about the doxing or what an Attorney General
{ Merrick Garland } should do about it.
You guessed it ... Crickets.
Americans should not have to tolerate this blatant disregard for
what is Truth and the American Way.
That is why we have Elections.To have our voices heard the best.
I mean,unless we have the technology to read a Fetus mind in the
womb.
Keep in mind what did Dr.Kermit Gosnell do with Aborted
Fetus'.The left also refuses to remind us.

 

[kyzr]

The Xiden presidency is a disaster wrapped in catastrophe:

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[eagle1462010]

::Issues4Life Foundation | Judgment At Nuremberg

The Issues4Life Foundation is dedicated to addressing the issues surrounding the inviolability or sanctity of human life in the African-American community.

www.issues4life.org

On Monday, January 22nd, 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 and simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton regarding the issue of abortion. The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy "somewhere" under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state's two (2) legitimate interests in regulating abortions and protecting women's health and ultimately the protection the potentiality of human life. Importantly, the United States Supreme Court never declared abortion itself to be a constitutional right. Rather, the Supreme Court said: "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins … the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer." Then, in the very text of the Roe v. Wade decision, the High Court made a key admission:

"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157] for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment."1

In my opinion, the United States Supreme Court needed to "resolve the difficult question of when life begins … " before rendering judgment on the death of the only product of a human male and a human female, that is a human being. Below are clips from the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremburg. In light of the fact that not one (1) of the seven (7) Supreme Court justices that made up the majority for 1973 Roe v. Wade decision are alive today, you can be the judge.

FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.

FindLaw's searchable database of United States Supreme Court decisions since

caselaw.findlaw.com

To summarize and to repeat:

1. A state criminal abortion statute of the current Texas type, that excepts from criminality only a life-saving procedure on behalf of the mother, without regard to pregnancy stage and without recognition of the other interests involved, is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician.

(b) For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health.

(c) For the stage subsequent to viability, the State in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life [410 U.S. 113, 165] may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.

2. The State may define the term "physician," as it has been employed in the preceding paragraphs of this Part XI of this opinion, to mean only a physician currently licensed by the State, and may proscribe any abortion by a person who is not a physician as so defined.

In Doe v. Bolton, post, p. 179, procedural requirements contained in one of the modern abortion statutes are considered. That opinion and this one, of course, are to be read together. 67

This holding, we feel, is consistent with the relative weights of the respective interests involved, with the lessons and examples of medical and legal history, with the lenity of the common law, and with the demands of the profound problems of the present day. The decision leaves the State free to place increasing restrictions on abortion as the period of pregnancy lengthens, so long as those restrictions are tailored to the recognized state interests. The decision vindicates the right of the physician to administer medical treatment according to his professional judgment up to the points where important [410 U.S. 113, 166] state interests provide compelling justifications for intervention. Up to those points, the abortion decision in all its aspects is inherently, and primarily, a medical decision, and basic responsibility for it must rest with the physician. If an individual practitioner abuses the privilege of exercising proper medical judgment, the usual remedies, judicial and intra-professional, are available.

 

[eagle1462010]

In Roe versus Wade the State Law of Texas was life begins at inception.

They ruled it was against the Constitution based on the mothers privacy on the 14th. But they didn't set this in stone for LATE TERM ABORTION.

As they state to VIABILITY of when the baby is a viable Human being..........Medical Journals of the time set that at 24 weeks.

What’s The Earliest A Baby Can Be Born And Survive?

Perhaps you’re facing a high-risk pregnancy, or you’re pregnant after a previous loss, and now you’re wondering: 'What is the

www.bellybelly.com.au

At what week in pregnancy can a baby survive outside the womb?​

The earliest a baby has been born and survived is 21 weeks and 5 days. Two premature babies hold the record for this.

Surprisingly, the first record holder was born in 1987, a time when the medical care of premature babies (neonatology) was a very new field.

However, this is well before the accepted age of viability. Usually, the earliest a baby can survive is about 22 weeks gestation. The age of viability is 24 weeks.

At 22 weeks, there’s a 0-10% chance of survival; at 24 weeks the survival rate is 40-70%.

 

[eagle1462010]

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Facts and figures relating to the frequency of abortion in the United States.

www.abort73.com

WHEN DO ABORTIONS OCCUR?​

• In 2019, 79% of all U.S. abortions occurred prior to the 10th week of gestation; 93% occurred prior to 14 weeks’ gestation (CDC).
• Percentage of 2019 Reported Abortions by Weeks of Gestation* (CDC):
  

  ≤6 wks	7-9 wks	10-13 wks	14-15 wks	16-17 wks	18-20 wks	≥21 wks
  42.9%	36.4%	13.4%	2.9%	1.7%	1.6%	1.0%

  *Gestational weeks are measured from the first day of the woman's last menstruation and not from the day of conception. Though it does not provide an accurate fetal age (which is roughly 2 weeks less than the gestational age), it is the simplest way for an OB/GYN to age a pregnancy since the day of conception is often not known. Hence, if an abortion occurs at 8 weeks gestation, it is actually aborting a 6 week embryo. The images on our Prenatal Development and Abortion Pictures pages are more precisely captioned with fetal ages in accordance with standard teaching texts on prenatal development.

WHY DO ABORTIONS OCCUR?​

• In 2004, the Guttmacher Institute anonymously surveyed 1,209 post-abortive women from nine different abortion clinics across the country. Of the women surveyed, 957 provided a main reason for having an abortion. This table lists each reason and the percentage of respondents who chose it.
  

  Percentage	Reason
  <0.5%	Victim of rape
  3%	Fetal health problems
  4%	Physical health problems
  4%	Would interfere with education or career
  7%	Not mature enough to raise a child
  8%	Don't want to be a single mother
  19%	Done having children
  23%	Can't afford a baby
  25%	Not ready for a child
  6%	Other

Only 4.3% would be affected by the Mississippi law in SCOTUS. So the law only applies to a very small percentage of all abortions there.

Roe V Wade admitted the State had a right to pass laws based on VIABILITY OF THE BABY........Which at the time was 24 weeks. But NEVER DECIDED WHEN LIFE BEGINS.

 

[Foolardi]

::Issues4Life Foundation | Judgment At Nuremberg

The Issues4Life Foundation is dedicated to addressing the issues surrounding the inviolability or sanctity of human life in the African-American community.

www.issues4life.org

On Monday, January 22nd, 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 and simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton regarding the issue of abortion. The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy "somewhere" under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state's two (2) legitimate interests in regulating abortions and protecting women's health and ultimately the protection the potentiality of human life. Importantly, the United States Supreme Court never declared abortion itself to be a constitutional right. Rather, the Supreme Court said: "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins … the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer." Then, in the very text of the Roe v. Wade decision, the High Court made a key admission:

"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157] for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment."1

In my opinion, the United States Supreme Court needed to "resolve the difficult question of when life begins … " before rendering judgment on the death of the only product of a human male and a human female, that is a human being. Below are clips from the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremburg. In light of the fact that not one (1) of the seven (7) Supreme Court justices that made up the majority for 1973 Roe v. Wade decision are alive today, you can be the judge.

FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.

FindLaw's searchable database of United States Supreme Court decisions since

caselaw.findlaw.com

To summarize and to repeat:

1. A state criminal abortion statute of the current Texas type, that excepts from criminality only a life-saving procedure on behalf of the mother, without regard to pregnancy stage and without recognition of the other interests involved, is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician.

(b) For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health.

(c) For the stage subsequent to viability, the State in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life [410 U.S. 113, 165] may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.

2. The State may define the term "physician," as it has been employed in the preceding paragraphs of this Part XI of this opinion, to mean only a physician currently licensed by the State, and may proscribe any abortion by a person who is not a physician as so defined.

In Doe v. Bolton, post, p. 179, procedural requirements contained in one of the modern abortion statutes are considered. That opinion and this one, of course, are to be read together. 67

This holding, we feel, is consistent with the relative weights of the respective interests involved, with the lessons and examples of medical and legal history, with the lenity of the common law, and with the demands of the profound problems of the present day. The decision leaves the State free to place increasing restrictions on abortion as the period of pregnancy lengthens, so long as those restrictions are tailored to the recognized state interests. The decision vindicates the right of the physician to administer medical treatment according to his professional judgment up to the points where important [410 U.S. 113, 166] state interests provide compelling justifications for intervention. Up to those points, the abortion decision in all its aspects is inherently, and primarily, a medical decision, and basic responsibility for it must rest with the physician. If an individual practitioner abuses the privilege of exercising proper medical judgment, the usual remedies, judicial and intra-professional, are available.

I'm reminded of what I heard last wednesday morning
listening to The Joe Madison Sirius XM { channel 126 }
before 10 am est. A caller called-in to ask or make the case
that Abortion could be termed MURDER.So of course Joe
{ the rudest and biggest Talk Radio Bully currently on the
airwaves } gladfully took the call.In order to place demands
on the caller.Madison will take a call and almost
instinctively if he dislikes the call { based on a call screener
prep as to the query or question that caller wants addressed }
will put forth the caller question but almost always demand that caller FIRST answer a Question by Madison.
Cuz he's The Black Eagle.Got it .
Madison went on and on about the word " Murder "
in context to what Aborting a fetus is.He then made a
juvenile analogy as to How many people are then committing
Murder in the U.S. whenever having an Abortion.
Or is a Physician also committing a Murder.
In the eyes of the Catholic church the answer is YES.
So Madison had to reroute his defense of Aborting a Fetus
as in ... well then how many Religions Besides the Catholic
Religion consider Abortions as if a Murder.
He went to great lenght to imply that very few religions
if any { besides the Catholic Church } hold the view that
Aborting a fetus is Murder.
I guess the point was that there is strength in numbers.
If most all Religions { besides the Catholic Religion }
do not hold that Abortion be treated as if Murder than it's
all well and good.
Says the Black Pimp with a pimple of a brain who thinks
he's some Black Eagle.With a college degree in Sociology.

 

[eagle1462010]

I'm reminded of what I heard last wednesday morning
listening to The Joe Madison Sirius XM { channel 126 }
before 10 am est. A caller called-in to ask or make the case
that Abortion could be termed MURDER.So of course Joe
{ the rudest and biggest Talk Radio Bully currently on the
airwaves } gladfully took the call.In order to place demands
on the caller.Madison will take a call and almost
instinctively if he dislikes the call { based on a call screener
prep as to the query or question that caller wants addressed }
will put forth the caller question but almost always demand that caller FIRST answer a Question by Madison.
Cuz he's The Black Eagle.Got it .
Madison went on and on about the word " Murder "
in context to what Aborting a fetus is.He then made a
juvenile analogy as to How many people are then committing
Murder in the U.S. whenever having an Abortion.
Or is a Physician also committing a Murder.
In the eyes of the Catholic church the answer is YES.
So Madison had to reroute his defense of Aborting a Fetus
as in ... well then how many Religions Besides the Catholic
Religion consider Abortions as if a Murder.
He went to great lenght to imply that very few religions
if any { besides the Catholic Church } hold the view that
Aborting a fetus is Murder.
I guess the point was that there is strength in numbers.
If most all Religions { besides the Catholic Religion }
do not hold that Abortion be treated as if Murder than it's
all well and good.
Says the Black Pimp with a pimple of a brain who thinks
he's some Black Eagle.With a college degree in Sociology.

Long winded rant saying you are fine aborting a baby up to Birth.........Which is Barbarism. I'm not Catholic.........
BTW.............Most Red states right now can throw your ass in jail aborting a baby after 24 weeks..........Perfectly legal via ROE V WADE.

So play your VIRTUE SIGNALING BS to someone who cares.

 

[Foolardi]

Long winded rant saying you are fine aborting a baby up to Birth.........Which is Barbarism. I'm not Catholic.........
BTW.............Most Red states right now can throw your ass in jail aborting a baby after 24 weeks..........Perfectly legal via ROE V WADE.

So play your VIRTUE SIGNALING BS to someone who cares.

Go away you bother me Kid.
I don't engage those like some " Black Eagle ".
What an offense to most all Eagles.
Like Yuz.

 

[eagle1462010]

Go away you bother me Kid.
I don't engage those like some " Black Eagle ".
What an offense to most all Eagles.
Like Yuz.

I'm not young........been around a long time.........Long enough to see the country destroyed by Morons like you.

Go play in traffic and play word games with the left..........they are more your style anyway.

They are now showing their true colors again........threatening to burn and kill over a ruling that will not even affect them in their state whatsoever. The ruling will STILL ALLOW THEM TO KEEP ABORTION ON DEMAND.

So take your fake as outrage and shove it up your ass Moonbat.

 

[j-mac]

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Facts and figures relating to the frequency of abortion in the United States.

www.abort73.com

WHEN DO ABORTIONS OCCUR?​

• In 2019, 79% of all U.S. abortions occurred prior to the 10th week of gestation; 93% occurred prior to 14 weeks’ gestation (CDC).
• Percentage of 2019 Reported Abortions by Weeks of Gestation* (CDC):
  

  ≤6 wks	7-9 wks	10-13 wks	14-15 wks	16-17 wks	18-20 wks	≥21 wks
  42.9%	36.4%	13.4%	2.9%	1.7%	1.6%	1.0%

  *Gestational weeks are measured from the first day of the woman's last menstruation and not from the day of conception. Though it does not provide an accurate fetal age (which is roughly 2 weeks less than the gestational age), it is the simplest way for an OB/GYN to age a pregnancy since the day of conception is often not known. Hence, if an abortion occurs at 8 weeks gestation, it is actually aborting a 6 week embryo. The images on our Prenatal Development and Abortion Pictures pages are more precisely captioned with fetal ages in accordance with standard teaching texts on prenatal development.

WHY DO ABORTIONS OCCUR?​

• In 2004, the Guttmacher Institute anonymously surveyed 1,209 post-abortive women from nine different abortion clinics across the country. Of the women surveyed, 957 provided a main reason for having an abortion. This table lists each reason and the percentage of respondents who chose it.
  

  Percentage	Reason
  <0.5%	Victim of rape
  3%	Fetal health problems
  4%	Physical health problems
  4%	Would interfere with education or career
  7%	Not mature enough to raise a child
  8%	Don't want to be a single mother
  19%	Done having children
  23%	Can't afford a baby
  25%	Not ready for a child
  6%	Other

Only 4.3% would be affected by the Mississippi law in SCOTUS. So the law only applies to a very small percentage of all abortions there.

Roe V Wade admitted the State had a right to pass laws based on VIABILITY OF THE BABY........Which at the time was 24 weeks. But NEVER DECIDED WHEN LIFE BEGINS.

This is what I have been saying for years...63 million abortions since 1973, and 93% of them were of contraceptive nature....A sad commentary on the morality of Americans....

 

[eagle1462010]

This is what I have been saying for years...63 million abortions since 1973, and 93% of them were of contraceptive nature....A sad commentary on the morality of Americans....

1 % of them are above the thresh hold of Roe v Wade............the current we are going to kill you campaign by the left is BS for politics..........It will not affect them in the blue states at all.

They believe they have the right of DICTATORSHIP to every state in the country on what to believe.......... Deep South Red States are saying this to them and their insanity.

 

[j-mac]

1 % of them are above the thresh hold of Roe v Wade............the current we are going to kill you campaign by the left is BS for politics..........It will not affect them in the blue states at all.

They believe they have the right of DICTATORSHIP to every state in the country on what to believe.......... Deep South Red States are saying this to them and their insanity.

And we inch ever closer to actual civil war.

 

[eagle1462010]

And we inch ever closer to actual civil war.

Where I live..............we don't don't even flinch at telling the leftist to go to hell...........they HATE US.........and we DON'T CARE.

They allow Abortion on demand in basically ever BLUE STATE..........If Roe V Wade is overturned they will still do it...........We on the other hand WILL DECIDE what we deem fitting and proper. We might have to change and old law if this goes through. It was never removed but disavowed by Roe v Wade.

Alabama Code Title 13A. Criminal Code § 13A-13-7 | FindLaw

Alabama Code Title 13A. Criminal Code Section 13A-13-7. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

Alabama Abortion Laws - FindLaw

Alabama has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the United States, including parental notification requirements that mandate court hearings if a minor does not wish to get parental permission. Learn about Alabama abortion laws and more at FindLaw's Alabama Family Laws section.

www.findlaw.com

The mother under Alabama law summary can't be prosecuted........but the Doctors can be prosecuted........via CURRENT LAW.......

Nothing stops the mother from flying to California and getting it...........Just says you can't do it here.

 

[Foolardi]

The mass public is being played,yet again by today's left.
The Opinion draft that Alito wrote back in Feburary
had nothing whatsoever to do with Women's Rights.
Or the Rights of Gay Marriage or use of Contraceptions.
Just the Rights of each state to determine for each state
and it's leadership concerning Abortions.
Alito was clear about that and fellow members of the
Supreme Court know full well that is what Alito wrote
and what he meant.
The left again is being obnoxiously disingenuous.
Like The Summer of Love { 2020 } where the RNC
Convention was dominated by concerns of Violence.
Whereas the DNC Convention never even mentioned it.
Like it never took place.
We also know that the Death of George Floyd was
used to manipulate the Mass Public in hyberbolic
fashion using Two Hate Groups { BLM and Antifa }.
The right has no such groups.
Just as not one lick of Violence at any Trump Rally.
If Pro-Lifers protest they do so in very moderated fashion.
Like Praying and singing.
We know what the drat Democrats do.
TIME Magazine released an article explaining/detailing
how Democrats won in the Election of 2020.
Tonight those tactics will be exposed in the streaming
Documentary debut of ... - 2000 Mules - by Dinesh D'Souza
A thorough Documentary explaining the Election theft
of 2020.
Plus the Time Magazine article { first week of Feburary,2021 }
- The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign
that Saved the 2020 Election - by Molly Ball
Where not just a wealthy cabal of big money donors
were used { dark money } but also BLM. It was used to stoke
and justify Protests.Not just once or a few weekends but
virtually an entire summer.The goal to diminish the popularity
of Trump and his fan base.By using Violence in league with
marxism to knock down and out any thoughts of Capitalism,
Americana and Trump's vision of Make America Great.

 

[Lesh]

Wait…

Right wing Trumpers don’t like Biden?

I’m shocked!!!