Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If there wasn't a code or rule being violated, then the college just censored free speech and on top of it slandered these students reputation by publicizing this situation in the way that they did, and potentially did financial harm to them.
It's a "public" university. Free speech could have been violated a right granted to every citizen no matter what they say under article 1 of the constitution.
Even if OU were to lose the suit, they still saved their "brand"
If there wasn't a code or rule being violated, then the college just censored free speech and on top of it slandered these students reputation by publicizing this situation in the way that they did, and potentially did financial harm to them.
It's a "public" university. Free speech could have been violated a right granted to every citizen no matter what they say under article 1 of the constitution.
Even if OU were to lose the suit, they still saved their "brand"
The brand that says you can't say something unless we approve of it? Trust me if you think these suits are the only ones possible like the other poster said, "any minority that feels their well being at the college has been subject to what the college expelled these students for can also sue.
If I were these kids I'd look to make a statement of all statement. I'd also try to sucker Obama and Al Sharpton in it also. Take them all down. Sue the college to where it stings and stings bad. At least 100 million and make them pay all attorney fees on top of it.
The right to sing ****** songs is integral to free speech.
If there wasn't a code or rule being violated, then the college just censored free speech and on top of it slandered these students reputation by publicizing this situation in the way that they did, and potentially did financial harm to them.
It's a "public" university. Free speech could have been violated a right granted to every citizen no matter what they say under article 1 of the constitution.
Even if OU were to lose the suit, they still saved their "brand"
The brand that says you can't say something unless we approve of it? Trust me if you think these suits are the only ones possible like the other poster said, "any minority that feels their well being at the college has been subject to what the college expelled these students for can also sue.
If I were these kids I'd look to make a statement of all statement. I'd also try to sucker Obama and Al Sharpton in it also. Take them all down. Sue the college to where it stings and stings bad. At least 100 million and make them pay all attorney fees on top of it.
Well, good luck with that.
I'm quivering, quivering I say.[...]
As you can see I will not sit by anymore and tolerate the elites totalitarianism bullshit by staying silent anymore. No liberal is safe. Additionally I have been paying attention and no poster is safe on this board. I will be very hard on people here. change is coming for Usmb.
LOL! Isn't it wonderful that the one's crying over this, are all the same tooth gnashers who demanded that people be ruined for refusing to bake a cake?
I suggest anybody who wants to protect free speech on campuses and in America start a fundraiser for these students to do exactly this what I'm suggesting.
BaaaahahahahaThe fascists here think the Constitution is irrelevant.The students have a perfect case. They were off campus in a private venue. Punishing people for unpopular statements is exactly what the 1A was meant to prevent.
Thank you. This thread will clearly define the smart posters who believe in the constitution from the morons here at usmb.
rabbi, I have been screwing around in the FZ because I'Ve been waiting for politics to be heated and actual worthy news and look at the last 48 hours.
As you can see I will not sit by anymore and tolerate the elites totalitarianism bullshit by staying silent anymore. No liberal is safe. Additionally I have been paying attention and no poster is safe on this board. I will be very hard on people here. change is coming for Usmb.

If there wasn't a code or rule being violated, then the college just censored free speech and on top of it slandered these students reputation by publicizing this situation in the way that they did, and potentially did financial harm to them.
It's a "public" university. Free speech could have been violated a right granted to every citizen no matter what they say under article 1 of the constitution.
If there wasn't a code or rule being violated, then the college just censored free speech and on top of it slandered these students reputation by publicizing this situation in the way that they did, and potentially did financial harm to them.
It's a "public" university. Free speech could have been violated a right granted to every citizen no matter what they say under article 1 of the constitution.
You DO know that free speech only applies when it is the government trying to suppress it, right?If there wasn't a code or rule being violated, then the college just censored free speech and on top of it slandered these students reputation by publicizing this situation in the way that they did, and potentially did financial harm to them.
It's a "public" university. Free speech could have been violated a right granted to every citizen no matter what they say under article 1 of the constitution.
It AMAZES me how naive the younger generations are and how they let people with positions of power control there BASIC FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS that the US CONSTITUTION is meant to PROTECT. Anybody 28 and under not me is a ******* moron.
If there wasn't a code or rule being violated, then the college just censored free speech and on top of it slandered these students reputation by publicizing this situation in the way that they did, and potentially did financial harm to them.
It's a "public" university. Free speech could have been violated a right granted to every citizen no matter what they say under article 1 of the constitution.
Could likely win an arguement that their civil rights were violated whether a school policy was broken or not.
They were going to a private function on a private charter bus.I guess it was your ::cough:: links to whatever in the wide world of **** you're talking about.
Or are you so arrogant you think you don't need them?
You need a link to prove that students were expelled for racist chants? Watch any news station MSNBC or foxnews.
Ah. No wonder.
I don't have a TV. That's for morons. You're gonna have to break a sweat and essplain yourself.
It's prolly gonna be one of the reasons I don't have TV in the first place.
By far your worst post here on usmb. I said I'm the last poster you'd want to debate on this site because I have the biggest balls and I'm very unpredictable And a genius.
Even the blacks on Hannity said free speech was violated And potential lawsuits should be filed by these students against the university. Hannity was destroyed on fox tonight.
A genius? Oh I get it now, pretty funny, sarcasm, good one. You seem to have forgotten that there is no such thing as free speech at a formal event of an officially sanctioned organization. They are bound by rules of conduct, ethics and behavior.