Okay, This Is My FINAL Attempt to Try and Restore Peace On This Message Board In Regards to Trump Views

[Alicia J]

What I have found through investigation is that not a single court threw out a voter fraud case after examining the evidence and finding it irrefutably invalid. If I am wrong, what court examined the evidence and found it to be entirely bogus?

All of them. You're just making shit up, mentally ill MAGA dude.

 

[Alicia J]

There is multiple evidence of 2020 voter fraud in Arizona as have been uncovered in other states. Democrats committed massive voter fraud and then lied to the American public while forcing the public to believe investigating fraud was somehow unpatriotic. Here is just one more example of unrefuted evidence of 2020 Arizona election fraud:

Arizona Senate Study Finds 200K Ballots Counted with Mismatched Signatures During 2020 Election | Human Events | humanevents.com

NEWS & ANALYSIS

Arizona Senate Study Finds 200K Ballots Counted with Mismatched Signatures During 2020 Election

A study of Maricopa County, Arizona’s mail-in ballots during the 2020 presidential election estimates that over 200,000 ballots with mismatched signatures were counted – without being reviewed or “cured.” The signature verification pilot study, commissioned by the Arizona State Senate and conducted by Shiva Ayyadurai’s Election Systems Integrity Institute, went public on Tuesday. Of the […]

• by: Human Events Staff

• February 28, 2022

That's not evidence of fraud. For example, maybe a husband signed for his wife. Or a wife signed for her husband.

There is no evidence that the ballots were mailed to people who should not have received them.

You are trying to find any inconsistency and call it "fraud". But that does not meet the criteria.

 

[markef]

In other words....YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE!

Nobody can prove the election results published by the private firm Runbeck were accurate, legitimate, or uncorrupted. Who gave Arizona permission to hire a private firm to count national election ballots in secret?


The SCIF on X: "A Runbeck whistleblower alleges over 300K ballots were inserted into the 2020 Maricopa County election by employees, outside the legal chain-of-custody, not from drop boxes or polling locations. The margin of victory in Arizona was only 10,457 votes. The 17,322 duplicate ballots https://t.co/ltd0laNm9g" / X

A Runbeck whistleblower alleges over 300K ballots were inserted into the 2020 Maricopa County election by employees, outside the legal chain-of-custody, not from drop boxes or polling locations. The margin of victory in Arizona was only 10,457 votes. The 17,322 duplicate ballots found in Maricopa County alone would flip Arizona from Biden to Trump. Officials also found multiple different ballot ID numbers on counted ballots but they all shared the same voter names, addresses, phone numbers, and signatures. Workers testified ballots arrived from Runbeck, who prints, marks, scans, transports, and verifies them, for days after the election, with unknown remaining votes despite electronic and supplemental poll books. Why are there so many duplicates, fraudulent ballots, same signatures, different paper, duplicate ballots, etc., if Runbeck is supposed to check all of this before the workers even tabulate the votes? Something is seriously wrong, and it's called fraud.

1:48 PM · Feb 17, 2026

·

 

[markef]

All of them. You're just making shit up, mentally ill MAGA dude.

You cannot produce a single court record detailing a court ruling proving all the evidence of Arizona 2020 voter fraud is invalid. No court is on record declaring voter fraud evidence has been irrefutably disproven.

 

[Alicia J]

Nobody can prove the election results published by the private firm Runbeck were accurate, legitimate, or uncorrupted. Who gave Arizona permission to hire a private firm to count national election ballots in secret?


The SCIF on X: "A Runbeck whistleblower alleges over 300K ballots were inserted into the 2020 Maricopa County election by employees, outside the legal chain-of-custody, not from drop boxes or polling locations. The margin of victory in Arizona was only 10,457 votes. The 17,322 duplicate ballots https://t.co/ltd0laNm9g" / X

A Runbeck whistleblower alleges over 300K ballots were inserted into the 2020 Maricopa County election by employees, outside the legal chain-of-custody, not from drop boxes or polling locations. The margin of victory in Arizona was only 10,457 votes. The 17,322 duplicate ballots found in Maricopa County alone would flip Arizona from Biden to Trump. Officials also found multiple different ballot ID numbers on counted ballots but they all shared the same voter names, addresses, phone numbers, and signatures. Workers testified ballots arrived from Runbeck, who prints, marks, scans, transports, and verifies them, for days after the election, with unknown remaining votes despite electronic and supplemental poll books. Why are there so many duplicates, fraudulent ballots, same signatures, different paper, duplicate ballots, etc., if Runbeck is supposed to check all of this before the workers even tabulate the votes? Something is seriously wrong, and it's called fraud.

1:48 PM · Feb 17, 2026

·

So where is the fraud here? Where does it say that these 300K ballots were switched from Trump to Biden?

Maybe proper ballot handling procedure wasn't followed, but that does not constitute fraud.

You are so desperate that you are just pointing to anything and calling it fraud.

 

[Alicia J]

You cannot produce a single court record detailing a court ruling proving all the evidence of Arizona 2020 voter fraud is invalid. No court is on record declaring voter fraud evidence has been irrefutably disproven.

I don't have to. If the courts threw out these horrible cases, that's all the evidence Democrats need.

 

[markef]

That's not evidence of fraud. For example, maybe a husband signed for his wife. Or a wife signed for her husband.

There is no evidence that the ballots were mailed to people who should not have received them.

You are trying to find any inconsistency and call it "fraud". But that does not meet the criteria.

Democrats can deny the evidence, can claim the evidence is not proof of fraud, or the evidence is bogus. All the democrats can do is claim the evidence is not proof of fraud while ignoring the fact that democrats cannot disprove the evidence of fraud.

 

[markef]

So where is the fraud here? Where does it say that these 300K ballots were switched from Trump to Biden?

Maybe proper ballot handling procedure wasn't followed, but that does not constitute fraud.

You are so desperate that you are just pointing to anything and calling it fraud.

You claim the evidence of fraud has not been judged by courts to be fraud, but the evidence of fraud has also not been found by courts to be bogus or disproven as fraud.

 

[Alicia J]

Democrats can deny the evidence, can claim the evidence is not proof of fraud, or the evidence is bogus. All the democrats can do is claim the evidence is not proof of fraud while ignoring the fact that democrats cannot disprove the evidence of fraud.

That's not evidence. You wanting it to be evidence does not make it evidence.

Explain to me how a husband signing a mail-in ballot for his wife is "voter fraud". How does that impact the final voting tally? It does not.

 

[markef]

I don't have to. If the courts threw out these horrible cases, that's all the evidence Democrats need.

You cannot produce even one court ruling dismissing the evidence of fraud as having been irrefutably disproven.

 

[markef]

That's not evidence. You wanting it to be evidence does not make it evidence.

Explain to me how a husband signing a mail-in ballot for his wife is "voter fraud". How does that impact the final voting tally? It does not.

Claiming the evidence of fraud is bogus is not disproving the unrefuted evidence of fraud.

 

[Alicia J]

You claim the evidence of fraud has not been judged by courts to be fraud, but the evidence of fraud has also not been found by courts to be bogus or disproven as fraud.

Whatever. This is still nothing but desperation on your part.

There has to be evidence of deliberate wrong doing to change the vote total for one candidate or the other candidate. You have produced NOTHING so far.

That's why the courts told Trump's stooge lawyers to take a hike.

 

[Alicia J]

Claiming the evidence of fraud is bogus is not disproving the unrefuted evidence of fraud.

You have no "unrefuted evidence of fraud". All you have is your pathetic MAGA desperation.

 

[markef]

That's not evidence. You wanting it to be evidence does not make it evidence.

Explain to me how a husband signing a mail-in ballot for his wife is "voter fraud". How does that impact the final voting tally? It does not.

200,000 husbands signed their wife's ballots illegally? No, that is a stupid attempt to explain away the clearly mismatched signatures which are required by law to be matching before being counted as valid.

 

[mudwhistle]

You mean you do. Pence would not help Trump commit fraud on Jan 6. And Trump was so mad about it that he was willing to let his traitor mob kill Pence. And you applaud that craziness.



Your mentally disturbed MAGA radicalized opinion means absolutely NOTHING.

Hate to break it to you.

There's nothing radical about being a moderate.

Try again.

 

[markef]

Whatever. This is still nothing but desperation on your part.

There has to be evidence of deliberate wrong doing to change the vote total for one candidate or the other candidate. You have produced NOTHING so far.

That's why the courts told Trump's stooge lawyers to take a hike.

Courts washed their hands of voting fraud cases in the first two months after the 2020 election, but no court disproved any evidence of 2020 voter fraud.

 

[Alicia J]

You cannot produce even one court ruling dismissing the evidence of fraud as having been irrefutably disproven.

I don't have to. I've already shown you that you don't have evidence of deliberate wrong doing.

Inconsistencies or improper handling of ballots does not automatically constitute fraud. I'm sure you probably know this, but you just are not an honest person.

 

[Alicia J]

There's nothing radical about being a moderate.

Try again.

Voting for a mentally ill man like Trump who tried to have his own VP killed by a deranged mob on Jan 6 does not make you a "moderate". You obviously have no idea what that word means.

But what you are is radicalized, full of hatred for anyone who disagrees with your political views, and easily manipulated by pathological liars like Trump. You are nothing but a total dupe.

 

[BothWings]

Silvio Berlusconi approves!

 

[mudwhistle]

Voting for a mentally ill man like Trump who tried to have his own VP killed by a deranged mob on Jan 6 does not make you a "moderate". You obviously have no idea what that word means.

But what you are is radicalized, full of hatred for anyone who disagrees with your political views, and easily manipulated by pathological liars like Trump. You are nothing but a total dupe.

Lies.

Is everyone who voted for Swalwell a rapist now?

Problem with you dipshits on the left is you think you can get away with guilt by association.

You could give a flying-**** about the real world because you spend so much time living in a leftist fantasy.