OK, I'll admit it, our friends on the left are correct; there IS a catch to the Trump tax cuts

[eddiew37]

Yes.
I want you to take $1000. Invest it. Come back next year and show how much you made? Show your work.

Only a dumbass like you would think $1,000 is the same as tens of millions of dollars as far as investments are concerned.

Did he say it's the same?

$1000 is more than $0.

How much have you invested so far, $0? And you still complain...

I find that to be a very common trait in wealth haters. Outside of a house or perhaps a company paid IRA, they never invested any of their own hard earned money.

Trump invested his daddy's money and that of those people who got screwed.

Who got screwed?

Pick one Ray
Exclusive: Trump's 3,500 lawsuits unprecedented for a presidential ...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/.../2016/...trump-lawsuits.../84995854/
Jun 1, 2016 - An exclusive USA TODAY analysis of legal filings across the U.S. finds that Donald Trumpand his businesses have been involved in at least 3500 legal actions in federal and state courts during the past three decades.
Legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia
Legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia
Jump to Lawsuit for inciting violence at March 2016 campaign rally - The lawsuit accuses DonaldTrump of inciting violence against protesters in Louisville, Kentucky. ... American 'ethno states', "spends much of his time" online writing "against Jews, gays and immigrants and urging whites to stand up for their race.
‎Lawsuits 1973–1999 · ‎Lawsuits 2000–2009 · ‎Lawsuits 2010–present
Top stories
NY AG sues Trump admin for 100th time

 

[bgrouse]

Someone asked me for proof some rich people are deadbeats, or something to that extent. I picked Trump as my example.

Oh, so now that you've been called out, you changed it to "some" rich people?

I never said they were all deadbeats, so there's nothing to change. "All" was the delusion of some dumbass on this forum. Ask him to prove it.

Sorry, but when you say "people who inherited money are deadbeats" that does mean all.

"All" means "All." "All" is not in that sentence, but it was in a different sentence posted by another illiterate retard like you.

No. If you don't quantify it, then it means all. You didn't say half, or most, or some, you said people who inherit money.

If it's not quantified, then it's not quantified. You're seeing something that isn't there. You should have that looked at. I can't help you with that since I'm not in the field of psychiatric medicine.

 

[buckeye45_73]

However a Congressmen who is looking after more than just one person is less corrupt.

this is patently false

like everything else, it depends

an example - the people of Atlanta & the people of South Alabama have been in a dispute over water rights for decades

Atlanta is a big city & utilizes a lot of resources

Atlanta also produces a tremendous amount of waste; so much that the Chattahoochee river is just about disgusting anywhere south of Atlanta

the waste has also just about destroyed marine life where the river lets out into the Gulf of Mexico & has seriously hurt the economy of fishermen in South Alabama

the politicians in Atlanta represent FAR more people than the politicians in South Alabama

is it corrupt to destroy nature?

do the millions of people in Atlanta have a right to fully utilize the river that is the lifeblood of the city?

are the pols that represent MORE people less corrupt when they continue to allow the river to be polluted to the point that those south of them cannot enjoy its benefits?

the world is not absolute & statements like the one you just made can almost always be disproven

because there are always at least 3 sides to every story

However a Congressmen who is looking after more than just one person is less corrupt.

this is patently false

like everything else, it depends

an example - the people of Atlanta & the people of South Alabama have been in a dispute over water rights for decades

Atlanta is a big city & utilizes a lot of resources

Atlanta also produces a tremendous amount of waste; so much that the Chattahoochee river is just about disgusting anywhere south of Atlanta

the waste has also just about destroyed marine life where the river lets out into the Gulf of Mexico & has seriously hurt the economy of fishermen in South Alabama

the politicians in Atlanta represent FAR more people than the politicians in South Alabama

is it corrupt to destroy nature?

do the millions of people in Atlanta have a right to fully utilize the river that is the lifeblood of the city?

are the pols that represent MORE people less corrupt when they continue to allow the river to be polluted to the point that those south of them cannot enjoy its benefits?

the world is not absolute & statements like the one you just made can almost always be disproven

because there are always at least 3 sides to every story

Best to have Democrats protecting the water...

yeah they did a great job in Flint

Of course you got that all wrong too, Dupe. LOL!

I love the evidence he points to...oh wait he never does......

 

[buckeye45_73]

Pass the 2010 Democrats immigration bill with a SS ID card that can't be faked - end of problem. The GOP love the cheap easily bullied labor and distract you dupes with a stupid un American wall and unconstitutional harassment laws... That won't work.

Unconstitutional bills and supposedly unconstitutional laws, really, where do you get this crap?


.

How many laws for harassing Hispanics have been called unconstitutional by the courts, idiot?

I can't think of any because there are no laws that specifically target hispanics. Your claim otherwise is a lie.


.

Just Google Anti illegals laws deemed unconstitutional and you will find pages of this, dupe...
Why Trump's Immigration Rules Are Unconstitutional - POLITICO Magazine
Politico › magazine › story › 2017/02
Feb 1, 2017 · An executive order or law displays unconstitutional animus and thus violates the ... state constitution—deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Romer v.


Arizona SB 1070 - Wikipedia
Wikipedia › wiki › Arizona_SB_1070
In June 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the case Arizona v. United States, upholding the provision requiring immigration status checks during law enforcement stops

You know hispanics only make up about 60% of illegals, right? The rest come from virtually every country in the world. Like I said there are no laws that specifically target hispanics, but feel free to continue your lies and I'll continue to laugh at you.


.

they don't have a clue as to why the wall is necessary and why we need so many changes to current law.

 

[buckeye45_73]

A liberal is a leftist. A liberal is a person of wealth envy. A liberal is a believer in Cradle-to-Grave government where personal responsibility is at the bare minimum and government makes all their decisions for them and everybody else. A liberal is a Socialist lite. A liberal is one who believes we live in a bubble, and within our bubble, there is only a finite amount of money, therefore, the reason some have too little is because others have too much.

A liberal is one who sides with evil over good at every turn. A liberal is one that desires for our country to look like a giant freak show where guys hold hand with guys in public, guys wearing dresses use female bathroom and shower facilities, and animals having more rights than humans.

Yes I am a partisan. I am anti-liberal. I am pro-conservative and yell it from the highest mountain tops with pride.

And a Duke believes all that crap they get from a propaganda machine paid for exclusively bye greedy idiot GOP billionaires and their dupes. YouTube's are always telling us we're sucking Obama's dick or other obscenities and believe that liberals just care about their welfare checks. You are absolutely a disgrace. Poor America. Breaking... GOP and Democratic whites are exactly the same economically. Minorities know where the racists and obscene ignoramuses are, in the GOP.

The Democrat party (like the Republican party) have their support groups. The two biggest support groups of the Democrats are government dependents and victims. Democrats love victims and victims love Democrats.

So the goal of the Democrat party is to expand both groups and they've done so successfully. When DumBama was President, he created over 40 million more new government dependents between Commie Care and food stamps alone. It was no accident.

If we were to rid ourselves of government dependents and victims, there would be no Democrat party left. They would only be heard of in history books. So don't tell me Democrat voters are only worried about their welfare check--because they are.

I thought you said you were not a rush bot LOL. White Republicans and white Democrats are indistinguishable economically. We do have the blacks and the Hispanics because they know who the racists are. And all the people who aren't greedy or brainwashed...

so franco is either racist or a self loathing white person......

No material is thicker than GOP Dupe skull LOL. By the way a racist is someone who believes certain races are inferior and discriminates against them. And they're all in the GOP. Your propaganda machine has a whole new definition. You live on an imaginary planet. Only the GOP is so deluded. The rest of the world is horrified.

your definition is correct, but, that's not the definition you guys use......not at all. Paula Dean said the N work like 30 years ago and you guys(the left) wanted her punished for it....what a joke.
I mean you guys are the anti racists but nominate a black person and what do you say?
He's clean and articulate
He speaks with no negro dialect.......

WE didn't say that, you guys did, clearly stating a very low bar.

 

[buckeye45_73]

LOOPHOLES offered to all republican states to get their senators votes Slime bag republicans ;;;;;; and they want bi partisanship with infrastructure?

awwwww...you voted for all those local taxes, and now you cant take it off your federal taxes.....awwwwww

but hey, atleast you're paying your fair share!!!!!!! that's good news right?

Just listen to the people you vote for

 

[buckeye45_73]

Yes.

PAPAGEORGIO said Trump got rich working. This is false. I was explaining that to him.Is that what republicans mean when they tell people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps? "Work" by not partying and blowing your $10-20 million you inherited? No wonder it doesn't work.

Blowing 10-20 million, puts 10-20 million back into the economy and creates a demand which in turn puts people to work, which means it is taxed. It is a natural way of income redistribution, not forced as the government does. So it is all good. If everyone who inherited their money did this, the economy would be better.

I really don’t care how other people spend their money or if they inherited their money, it isn’t my business and I have more important things to worry about than whether you worked for your wealth or inherited your wealth.

They could get the money back into the economy by taxing the inheritance. Then they wouldn't have to worry about wasting goods and services on some good-for-nothing lazy rich deadbeat.

The point is he didn't get rich working. Do you understand or do you need me to hold your hand and point out the important lines in the posts?

since when do you guys care about working?
Second, why cant rich people leave money to their kids?

They can, but it should be taxed like regular income at the very least.

and third he increased his wealth by quite a bit working, so it's not like he took the money from daddy and then blew it on hookers and coke.

Why can't everyone else pull themselves up by their bootstraps and "work" by investing their spare $10-20 million they have laying around?

But the lazy rich kid who inherited the money did?

wow are you on crack? or do you just like to deny reality to keep your bubble up?

The reality is that inheriting something is not "work."

PAPAGEORGIO said Trump got rich working. This is false. I was explaining that to him.Is that what republicans mean when they tell people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps? "Work" by not partying and blowing your $10-20 million you inherited? No wonder it doesn't work.

OK, he got richer working......he had money and did something with it...why are you such a hater of that......
was your dad rich and you tossed it down the toilet?

Yeah, he put it somewhere for it to become more money. Investments are not "work" kind of like the lottery is not work.

I want you to take $1000. Invest it. Come back next year and show how much you made? Show your work.

Exactly. Trump took about 40 million dollars and turned it into billions.

While screwing 1000's of poor and middle class people ,,,a few banks and hotels What a guy Only went bankrupt 6 times

how did he screw middle class and poor people?
and 6 times? try again

 

[buckeye45_73]

Get 'em outta here America hater. ^

Guess what, only bigots want to throw Worthy immigrants out of the country. Pass the 2010 immigration Bill and end this crap.

worthy immigrants? Do tell how you determine worthy

and replacing the lottery with merit does bring in "worthy" immigrants, but you guys are against it..

 

[eddiew37]

Yes.

Blowing 10-20 million, puts 10-20 million back into the economy and creates a demand which in turn puts people to work, which means it is taxed. It is a natural way of income redistribution, not forced as the government does. So it is all good. If everyone who inherited their money did this, the economy would be better.

I really don’t care how other people spend their money or if they inherited their money, it isn’t my business and I have more important things to worry about than whether you worked for your wealth or inherited your wealth.

They could get the money back into the economy by taxing the inheritance. Then they wouldn't have to worry about wasting goods and services on some good-for-nothing lazy rich deadbeat.

since when do you guys care about working?
Second, why cant rich people leave money to their kids?

They can, but it should be taxed like regular income at the very least.

and third he increased his wealth by quite a bit working, so it's not like he took the money from daddy and then blew it on hookers and coke.

Why can't everyone else pull themselves up by their bootstraps and "work" by investing their spare $10-20 million they have laying around?

wow are you on crack? or do you just like to deny reality to keep your bubble up?

The reality is that inheriting something is not "work."

OK, he got richer working......he had money and did something with it...why are you such a hater of that......
was your dad rich and you tossed it down the toilet?

Yeah, he put it somewhere for it to become more money. Investments are not "work" kind of like the lottery is not work.

I want you to take $1000. Invest it. Come back next year and show how much you made? Show your work.

Exactly. Trump took about 40 million dollars and turned it into billions.

While screwing 1000's of poor and middle class people ,,,a few banks and hotels What a guy Only went bankrupt 6 times

how did he screw middle class and poor people?
and 6 times? try again

OK just 4
Fiorina said Trump was "forced to file for bankruptcy not once, not twice, four times."

While it is accurate that Trump filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy four times, Fiorina’s statement doesn’t tell the whole story. In context, Fiorina’s phrasing suggests Trump was personally responsible for the failures of these businesses, but in reality, much was out of Trump’s control -- such as a struggling casino industry. But Trump is certainly not blameless.

We rate Fiorina’s statement Mostly True.

 

[OKTexas]

Yep, because we have a federal government that is involved in shit it was never intended to be. Put the leviathan back in its constitutional box and it all goes away. How did this country ever survive, grow and prosper with out the 16th amendment?


.

You call spending by the federal government on states and individuals isn't constitutional, but how are you going to ever prove it?: As a taxpayer you have no standing to bring the issue to court.

I have standing with my congresscritters both fed and State. They're making headway, but not fast enough.

.

 

[OKTexas]

What else could I think when you say that Donald should have used his own money to repay the debts of a bankrupt company?

That's an important point. That Trump sold his deals under the pretext that he was investing his own money, and that people could get a piece of the action. Instead Trump took out his own money and was only using his investors money, and could piss it away without losing a dime.

Damn, it only took 4 posts for you to contradict yourself, didn't you say he could have 4 billion more had he not invested in real estate? He took risks and lost, it happens all the time in business.


.

 

[Papageorgio]

PAPAGEORGIO said Trump got rich working. This is false. I was explaining that to him.Is that what republicans mean when they tell people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps? "Work" by not partying and blowing your $10-20 million you inherited? No wonder it doesn't work.

Blowing 10-20 million, puts 10-20 million back into the economy and creates a demand which in turn puts people to work, which means it is taxed. It is a natural way of income redistribution, not forced as the government does. So it is all good. If everyone who inherited their money did this, the economy would be better.

I really don’t care how other people spend their money or if they inherited their money, it isn’t my business and I have more important things to worry about than whether you worked for your wealth or inherited your wealth.

They could get the money back into the economy by taxing the inheritance. Then they wouldn't have to worry about wasting goods and services on some good-for-nothing lazy rich deadbeat.

The point is he didn't get rich working. Do you understand or do you need me to hold your hand and point out the important lines in the posts?

since when do you guys care about working?
Second, why cant rich people leave money to their kids?

They can, but it should be taxed like regular income at the very least.

and third he increased his wealth by quite a bit working, so it's not like he took the money from daddy and then blew it on hookers and coke.

Why can't everyone else pull themselves up by their bootstraps and "work" by investing their spare $10-20 million they have laying around?

But the lazy rich kid who inherited the money did?

wow are you on crack? or do you just like to deny reality to keep your bubble up?

The reality is that inheriting something is not "work."

PAPAGEORGIO said Trump got rich working. This is false. I was explaining that to him.Is that what republicans mean when they tell people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps? "Work" by not partying and blowing your $10-20 million you inherited? No wonder it doesn't work.

OK, he got richer working......he had money and did something with it...why are you such a hater of that......
was your dad rich and you tossed it down the toilet?

Yeah, he put it somewhere for it to become more money. Investments are not "work" kind of like the lottery is not work.

Considering that trumps businesses have gone bankrupt three or four times and he ended up being a brand name and a reality TV bozo... He is a bad businessman. In the end he just took money to put his name on other people's buildings. He's a con man who will never show his tax returns...

How many of your businesses are successful?

Sorry, daddy didn't give me millions to invest.

My dad gave me nothing however I have built and sold three business

Prove it, because you claimed you did, yet all you did is deflect saying your lie wasn’t important. It is because you are basing your idea on a bigoted view point. So as you continue to lie, we will call you out on them.

I just finished with ADMIRAL ROCKWELL TORY (see his posts in the last 5 hours), an illiterate moron who couldn't figure out what I said and thought I was lying.

I don’t think you are lying, I know you are. You have produced nothing, thanks for proving you are a bigot and a liar.

I handed him his ass right here:

How the **** should I know? Did I ever make any claim related to that regarding Trump's brothers and sisters? I'm asking someone to back up something they said. You're asking me to back up/explain something I didn't say.

You claimed he got rich because of inheritance, did you not?

That was a lie. He was already rich before his father and mother died. You are a liar. Admit it. You post things that you know for certain are not true. .

I said he got it from his dad, one way or another.

He inherited it, stupid. He may have also received some as a gift prior to his father's death.

That was, oh, over 100-200 posts back. See, it's that problem rearing its ugly head again: your illiteracy.

Who the hell cares, I asked you to prove that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy, you have not proved it, unless you are citing one person as your evidence that millions are that way.

I didn't say anything about "millions." That's your statement, dumbass. I don't have to prove what you said.

Dumb ass prove to me that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy. Thank you.

 

[bgrouse]

Blowing 10-20 million, puts 10-20 million back into the economy and creates a demand which in turn puts people to work, which means it is taxed. It is a natural way of income redistribution, not forced as the government does. So it is all good. If everyone who inherited their money did this, the economy would be better.

I really don’t care how other people spend their money or if they inherited their money, it isn’t my business and I have more important things to worry about than whether you worked for your wealth or inherited your wealth.

They could get the money back into the economy by taxing the inheritance. Then they wouldn't have to worry about wasting goods and services on some good-for-nothing lazy rich deadbeat.

since when do you guys care about working?
Second, why cant rich people leave money to their kids?

They can, but it should be taxed like regular income at the very least.

and third he increased his wealth by quite a bit working, so it's not like he took the money from daddy and then blew it on hookers and coke.

Why can't everyone else pull themselves up by their bootstraps and "work" by investing their spare $10-20 million they have laying around?

wow are you on crack? or do you just like to deny reality to keep your bubble up?

The reality is that inheriting something is not "work."

OK, he got richer working......he had money and did something with it...why are you such a hater of that......
was your dad rich and you tossed it down the toilet?

Yeah, he put it somewhere for it to become more money. Investments are not "work" kind of like the lottery is not work.

Considering that trumps businesses have gone bankrupt three or four times and he ended up being a brand name and a reality TV bozo... He is a bad businessman. In the end he just took money to put his name on other people's buildings. He's a con man who will never show his tax returns...

How many of your businesses are successful?

Sorry, daddy didn't give me millions to invest.

My dad gave me nothing however I have built and sold three business

I just finished with ADMIRAL ROCKWELL TORY (see his posts in the last 5 hours), an illiterate moron who couldn't figure out what I said and thought I was lying.

I don’t think you are lying, I know you are. You have produced nothing, thanks for proving you are a bigot and a liar.

I handed him his ass right here:

You claimed he got rich because of inheritance, did you not?

That was a lie. He was already rich before his father and mother died. You are a liar. Admit it. You post things that you know for certain are not true. .

I said he got it from his dad, one way or another.

He inherited it, stupid. He may have also received some as a gift prior to his father's death.

That was, oh, over 100-200 posts back. See, it's that problem rearing its ugly head again: your illiteracy.

Who the hell cares, I asked you to prove that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy, you have not proved it, unless you are citing one person as your evidence that millions are that way.

I didn't say anything about "millions." That's your statement, dumbass. I don't have to prove what you said.

Dumb ass prove to me that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy. Thank you.

I already proved my claim to you with Trump. If you want me to prove something you or some other asshole said, contact said asshole, idiot.

 

[sealybobo]

You actually have to work and make enough money to pay taxes to actually benefit.

That godam Trump and the evil republicans running the government **** the little guy at every turn...

The new method being used is expected to push more Americans into higher tax brackets more quickly. By switching to this new method, the government will bring an additional $134 billion in over the next decade.

This is from people like you, not rich people sucker.

How will that happen?

It comes down to this: The chained CPI makes inflation appear lower, and that means tax brackets will be adjusted upward but lots of workers will continue to get raises based upon the faster-rising traditional CPI. In other words, your income may rise faster than the inflation adjustments, forcing you to pay taxes at a higher rate — even though you may not feel any richer.

Compared to where taxpayers are now by 2027 most individuals will actually pay more taxes!!!!!

The difference will be slight, perhaps just a few tenths of a percentage point a year but over time, these fractions of a percentage point add up and can amount to a fair amount of money.

But the rich will be doing great in 8 years. You will be doing no better.

 

[Papageorgio]

They could get the money back into the economy by taxing the inheritance. Then they wouldn't have to worry about wasting goods and services on some good-for-nothing lazy rich deadbeat.



They can, but it should be taxed like regular income at the very least.Why can't everyone else pull themselves up by their bootstraps and "work" by investing their spare $10-20 million they have laying around?

The reality is that inheriting something is not "work."

Yeah, he put it somewhere for it to become more money. Investments are not "work" kind of like the lottery is not work.

Considering that trumps businesses have gone bankrupt three or four times and he ended up being a brand name and a reality TV bozo... He is a bad businessman. In the end he just took money to put his name on other people's buildings. He's a con man who will never show his tax returns...

How many of your businesses are successful?

Sorry, daddy didn't give me millions to invest.

My dad gave me nothing however I have built and sold three business

I don’t think you are lying, I know you are. You have produced nothing, thanks for proving you are a bigot and a liar.

I handed him his ass right here:

I said he got it from his dad, one way or another.

He inherited it, stupid. He may have also received some as a gift prior to his father's death.

That was, oh, over 100-200 posts back. See, it's that problem rearing its ugly head again: your illiteracy.

Who the hell cares, I asked you to prove that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy, you have not proved it, unless you are citing one person as your evidence that millions are that way.

I didn't say anything about "millions." That's your statement, dumbass. I don't have to prove what you said.

Dumb ass prove to me that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy. Thank you.

I already proved my claim to you with Trump. If you want me to prove something you or some other asshole said, contact said asshole, idiot.

You proved one person out of a million is what you claim. You are a dishonest, I know two people that inherited their money and are great people, so now you got nothing but your ignorance and bigotry.

 

[bgrouse]

Considering that trumps businesses have gone bankrupt three or four times and he ended up being a brand name and a reality TV bozo... He is a bad businessman. In the end he just took money to put his name on other people's buildings. He's a con man who will never show his tax returns...

How many of your businesses are successful?

Sorry, daddy didn't give me millions to invest.

My dad gave me nothing however I have built and sold three business

I handed him his ass right here:

Who the hell cares, I asked you to prove that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy, you have not proved it, unless you are citing one person as your evidence that millions are that way.

I didn't say anything about "millions." That's your statement, dumbass. I don't have to prove what you said.

Dumb ass prove to me that rich people who inherit money from their parents are deadbeats and lazy. Thank you.

I already proved my claim to you with Trump. If you want me to prove something you or some other asshole said, contact said asshole, idiot.

You proved one person out of a million is what you claim. You are a dishonest, I know two people that inherited their money and are great people, so now you got nothing but your ignorance and bigotry.

I proved what I said. I don't have to prove what you said.

Here's a tissue. I expect you will shed many a tear whining about how I'm dishonest because I don't want to prove your statements or those of other idiots.

 

[francoHFW]

And the ones who have been getting all the new Wealth for 35 years... We need consumer demand in this country and not gigantic tax breaks for the rich who are so bloated it's ridiculous. And the biggest tax break you got ever was the payroll tax breaks Obama gave you and which the GOP would not extend.

That is right in 2010 he extended the Bush tax cuts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The middle of a giant corrupt GOP economic meltdown is hardly the time to raise taxes on anyone duh...

So dummy, Obama didn’t do a damn thing, it was Bush and his tax cuts, you are a big dupe. Trying to give Obama credit, desperate even for you!

Obama gave a tax cut to the non-rich only, something that Republicans never do. they just give scraps while giving the rich huge tax cuts. Totally bought off scumbags and then you dupes. And they block good vacations good roads paid parental leave cheap daycare minimum wage living wage. You think nothing of that when voting but you know all the phony scandals on Hillary LOL

Let me get this straight.

You support Barry tax cuts, but you don't support Bush tax cuts.

Interesting, since all Barry did was, he extended Bush tax cuts.

You might be bit confused, but let that sink in...

Obama did that in the middle of a gigantic corrupt GOP economic meltdown, which is no time to tax anyone more. Duh. I support tax cuts for the non Rich who need the help, not the bloated rich after 35 years of a GOP giveaway that has not worked since 1983 if then.

 

[francoHFW]

Best to have Democrats protecting the water...

apparently not

the city council in Atlanta is almost exclusively run by democrats

I mean sure, the white folks in Buckhead send a few republicans, but the city is certainly run by democrats

nice try though

Democrats love clean water. Just ask people of Flint.

That was the new GOP Administration, super dupe.

 

[eddiew37]

You actually have to work and make enough money to pay taxes to actually benefit.

That godam Trump and the evil republicans running the government **** the little guy at every turn...

The new method being used is expected to push more Americans into higher tax brackets more quickly. By switching to this new method, the government will bring an additional $134 billion in over the next decade.

This is from people like you, not rich people sucker.

How will that happen?

It comes down to this: The chained CPI makes inflation appear lower, and that means tax brackets will be adjusted upward but lots of workers will continue to get raises based upon the faster-rising traditional CPI. In other words, your income may rise faster than the inflation adjustments, forcing you to pay taxes at a higher rate — even though you may not feel any richer.

Compared to where taxpayers are now by 2027 most individuals will actually pay more taxes!!!!!

The difference will be slight, perhaps just a few tenths of a percentage point a year but over time, these fractions of a percentage point add up and can amount to a fair amount of money.

But the rich will be doing great in 8 years. You will be doing no better.

As has been the case for the last 30 or so years

 

[francoHFW]

...

Every other country has a progressive tax system, here we don't anymore. Federal income taxes are much smaller now and the only Progressive one.

Damn, two sentences, and one contradicts the other. LMAO


.

How so?

Every other country has a progressive tax system, here we don't anymore. Federal income taxes are much smaller now and the only Progressive one.

We don't have progressive taxes anymore, yet the federal system is the only one that is? Do we have a progressive system or not?


.

When the top 80% of wage earners pay between 24 and 29% of their income in all taxes, that is a flat tax system. And a great way to make us a Banana Republic. All the New Wealth ends up with the richest and the country Goes to Hell, like the last 35 years. great job.

Damn, you're a worse broken record than matthew, individual taxing authorities set their rates, The feds are not responsible for SALT rates and they are not responsible for subsidizing them.

Also I've had enough of your class warfare crap, people move up and down the economic ladder all the time, no one is being held down and no one is being held up. You, I and everyone else are the sum total of our own decisions, accept that fact and move on.


.

Yep don't worry about facts and the GOP giving the store away to the rich while screwing everyone else, it's just that everyone decided to get lazy all of a sudden. Really silly stuff, dupe.