Ok, I can see closing this

[Auld Phart]

loophole

Would-be terrorists could exploit gun law loophole used by Saudi pilot in Pensacola shooting rampage: FBI

"Mohammed Alshamrani, 21, a second lieutenant in the Saudi air force who was in the United States for flight training, was able to buy a Glock 9 mm pistol from a Florida gun shop by taking advantage of a federal gun law exception that allows foreign nationals to legally purchase weapons with a valid hunting license."

Get access to firearms because they have a hunting license?

Maybe there should be something on the hunting license to restricting what they are allowed to hunt?

comments?

 

[Crepitus]

We've been telling you all along it's too easy to get a gun.

 

[Synthaholic]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

 

[Auld Phart]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I would limit all gun purchases to the "We the People of the United States" mentioned in the Constitution.

Rights to non-citizens should be limited and qualified.

 

[sparky]

comments?

who hunts w/a 9mm pistol?

~S~

 

[Auld Phart]

comments?

who hunts w/a 9mm pistol?

~S~

Not the point.

Because of that loophole, any legal or illegal alien with a hunting license can purchase any firearm from a .22 derringer to an AK-47.

That particular loophole needs closed

 

[Pogo]

comments?

who hunts w/a 9mm pistol?

~S~

Human hunters.

 

[Synthaholic]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

Too many flies on that bill.

 

[Synthaholic]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

Too many flies on that bill.

Name those flies that Moscow Mitch is opposed to.

you won’t. You can’t. Because, as usual, you’re talking out your ass.

 

[Auld Phart]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

and do those bills ONLY cover the loophole?

or are they filled with a dem wish list?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

Too many flies on that bill.

Name those flies that Moscow Mitch is opposed to.

you won’t. You can’t. Because, as usual, you’re talking out your ass.

Yawn.

Reach into the trash can yourself.

 

[sparky]

comments?

who hunts w/a 9mm pistol?

~S~

Not the point.

Because of that loophole, any legal or illegal alien with a hunting license can purchase any firearm from a .22 derringer to an AK-47.

That particular loophole needs closed

Well that's one really screwed up loophole ,considering most hunting licenses impart firearm specifics

~S~

 

[Synthaholic]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

and do those bills ONLY cover the loophole?

or are they filled with a dem wish list?

Do you not know what bi-partisan means?

 

[Synthaholic]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

Too many flies on that bill.

Name those flies that Moscow Mitch is opposed to.

you won’t. You can’t. Because, as usual, you’re talking out your ass.

Yawn.

Reach into the trash can yourself.

I called it. Just another parrot.

 

[sparky]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

and do those bills ONLY cover the loophole?

or are they filled with a dem wish list?

Do you not know what bi-partisan means?

some kinda gay farm animal?

~S~

 

[Auld Phart]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

and do those bills ONLY cover the loophole?

or are they filled with a dem wish list?

Do you not know what bi-partisan means?

Yes.

NOW, start listing the wish list the dems inserted that are preventing it from going anywhere.

 

[Synthaholic]

So that blood is on Moscow Mitch’s hands?

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

and do those bills ONLY cover the loophole?

or are they filled with a dem wish list?

Do you not know what bi-partisan means?

Yes.

NOW, start listing the wish list the dems inserted that are preventing it from going anywhere.

You’re making the claim that this list exists. Tell us all about it.

 

[Auld Phart]

Why would it be on his hands?

You’re clueless, or just acting clueless? There have been bi-partisan bills on his desk for almost a year to deal with this loophole.

and do those bills ONLY cover the loophole?

or are they filled with a dem wish list?

Do you not know what bi-partisan means?

Yes.

NOW, start listing the wish list the dems inserted that are preventing it from going anywhere.

You’re making the claim that this list exists. Tell us all about it.

I'm making the claim that dems, and possibly pubs, added pork and/or non-starters to the bill that got it tabled.

your seemingly inability to provide a link to the bill makes me think I'm correct.

as to it being bipartisan, what was the vote in the House to get it passed?