Ohio police shot black man 60 times

So how is it that black criminals who are unarmed are killed by the police, but white criminals who actually shoot or shot at the police are not.

Because the media controls your mind, that's why. You believe no unarmed whites ever get shot when statistics show that plenty of unarmed whites get shot by police. But they could never control your mind if they educated you on that. So they only report when unarmed blacks are shot by police because blacks are much more easy to rile up. We whites don't do that. If we see an unarmed white gets shot or killed by police, we simply shrug our shoulders and say "the asshole must have deserved it!"

It's all about money. If the MSM can get blacks to protest, that's money in their pocket. More people tune into their internet site, their television stations, their blogs. The more people tune in, the more they charge for advertising. If they can excite blacks up to riot, better yet. If people get killed in the riots, that's the best.

They can't control us whites like that because most of us can see through their plot.
 
How many folks fire at the cops ONE time while fleeing and then jumps out the car and leaves their gun 🔫 in the 🚗. It doesn't make sense and then you fire over 90 rounds hitting the man at least 60 times.

There were eight officers involved so that's a little more than ten shots each. I don't know why they fired so many times, but again, that will all come out when the investigation is complete. And remember, never trust first reporting. It's always wrong.
 
Yeah right. We should vote for a bunch of people like you.
49 years Joe Biden said he worked with wonderful segregationist to keep his kids out of racial jungles.. and another long list of 30 plus year democrats who has kept you enslaved on the democrat plantation.
 
Philando Castile was murdered while complying with police. So let's cease with thfe standard bullshit. There was a couple in Cleveland murdered by police because they had a chase and fired over 100 bullets in the car. That couple killed no one, but the white dude on the 4th tried to run but his car was not shot up.

Now whites here can put your heads in the sand all you want and talk about somebody running. Whites run all the time, so stop pretending that everybody white peacefully complies with the police. There are 2 systems of justice in this country. Chris Hayes hit the home run when he wrote the book a colony in a naturalization ion. Blacks are tired of living in the colony.

Darrell Brooks deliberately went to a white neighborhood and ran over 50 people killing 6 of them including an 8 year old child. Did the police kill him when they found him standing on a porch? No. He complied and was arrested.
 
Because the media controls your mind, that's why. You believe no unarmed whites ever get shot when statistics show that plenty of unarmed whites get shot by police. But they could never control your mind if they educated you on that. So they only report when unarmed blacks are shot by police because blacks are much more easy to rile up. We whites don't do that. If we see an unarmed white gets shot or killed by police, we simply shrug our shoulders and say "the asshole must have deserved it!"

It's all about money. If the MSM can get blacks to protest, that's money in their pocket. More people tune into their internet site, their television stations, their blogs. The more people tune in, the more they charge for advertising. If they can excite blacks up to riot, better yet. If people get killed in the riots, that's the best.

They can't control us whites like that because most of us can see through their plot.
All of that amounts to trash Ray. I see too many unarmed black folks shot and killed and we see whites who have beaten, stabbed and shot cops taken into custody.
 
Understand this, YOU don't tell me anything. The man in Kentucky was being served a warrant at his house. When they came to the door it was time for him to surrender. He did not surrender and he murdered 3 police. Tennessee vs Garner says there must be a threat. Running with your back turned to the police is not a threat. Killing three police who are trying to serve you a warrant is.

Cease the excuses son.

What do you do, make up your own stories as you go along?

Yes, he shot and killed three cops. There was a standoff for three hours, and police finally convinced him to come out of the house and surrender peacefully which he did. WTF did you want the cops to do, just shoot him in cold blood while surrendering? Those cops would be in jail today.

It's much different than police chasing a suspect, told to freeze, and the suspect makes a threatening move. So quit bringing up two totally different situations.
 
So how is it that black criminals who are unarmed are killed by the police, but white criminals who actually shoot or shot at the police are not.
Because fuck Black people.

:dunno:

Do you want a serious answer?

Because some young black males are known to be ruthless, violent criminals. And that stigma translates to all young black males, because that thug life is glorified and replicated. That, coupled with young black males fighting with police, it becomes a vicious cycle.

It's wrong. We need to fix that. But it is what it is.

But what you really want to say is "muh, racism."

Save it.

How many millions of times are you motherfuckers gonna cry wolf.?

It's to the point now where anybody who's streaming racism is probably a fucking commie shit trying to get over.
 
What do you do, make up your own stories as you go along?

Yes, he shot and killed three cops. There was a standoff for three hours, and police finally convinced him to come out of the house and surrender peacefully which he did. WTF did you want the cops to do, just shoot him in cold blood while surrendering?

That's what was done to Andre Hill.
 
All of that amounts to trash Ray. I see too many unarmed black folks shot and killed and we see whites who have beaten, stabbed and shot cops taken into custody.

as of July 9, whites were 54 percent of the 440 police shooting victims this year whose race was known, blacks were 28 percent and Hispanics were 18 percent, according to The Washington Post’s ongoing database of fatal police shootings. Those ratios are similar to last year’s tally, in which whites made up 50 percent of the 987 fatal police shootings, and blacks, 26 percent. (The vast majority of those police homicide victims were armed or otherwise threatening the officer.) But Butterfield could be forgiven his error, given the virtually exclusive media focus on black victims of police officers.

Typically, activists and the media measure police actions against population ratios. Given that blacks are 13 percent of the nation’s population, a 26 to 28 percent black share of police gun fatalities looks disproportionate. But policing should be measured against crime rates, not population percentages, because law enforcement today is data-driven. Officers are deployed to where people are most being victimized, and that is primarily in minority neighborhoods.

In America’s 75 largest counties, comprising most of the nation’s population, blacks constituted 62 percent of all robbery defendants in 2009, 57 percent of all murder defendants, and 45 percent of all assault defendants — but roughly 15 percent of the population in those counties. In New York, where blacks make up 23 percent of the city’s population, blacks commit three-quarters of all shootings and 70 percent of all robberies, according to victims and witnesses. (Whites, by contrast, commit less than 2 percent of all shootings in New York City and 4 percent of all robberies, though they are nearly 34 percent of the population.)

In 2015, the police fatally shot 36 unarmed black males, according to The Washington Post’s typology, and 31 unarmed white males. The Post’s classification of victims as “unarmed” is literally accurate but sometimes misleading. The label can fail to convey the charged situation facing the officer who used deadly force.
At least five “unarmed” black victims had tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. One had the officer on the ground and was beating him on the head so violently, breaking bones and causing other injuries, as to risk the officer’s loss of consciousness. And one individual included in the Post’s “unarmed black male victim” category was a bystander unintentionally struck by an officer’s bullet after an illegal-gun trafficker opened fire at the officer and the officer shot back. If a victim was not the intended target of a police shooting, race could have had no possible role in his death.


 
as of July 9, whites were 54 percent of the 440 police shooting victims this year whose race was known, blacks were 28 percent and Hispanics were 18 percent, according to The Washington Post’s ongoing database of fatal police shootings. Those ratios are similar to last year’s tally, in which whites made up 50 percent of the 987 fatal police shootings, and blacks, 26 percent. (The vast majority of those police homicide victims were armed or otherwise threatening the officer.) But Butterfield could be forgiven his error, given the virtually exclusive media focus on black victims of police officers.

Typically, activists and the media measure police actions against population ratios. Given that blacks are 13 percent of the nation’s population, a 26 to 28 percent black share of police gun fatalities looks disproportionate. But policing should be measured against crime rates, not population percentages, because law enforcement today is data-driven. Officers are deployed to where people are most being victimized, and that is primarily in minority neighborhoods.

In America’s 75 largest counties, comprising most of the nation’s population, blacks constituted 62 percent of all robbery defendants in 2009, 57 percent of all murder defendants, and 45 percent of all assault defendants — but roughly 15 percent of the population in those counties. In New York, where blacks make up 23 percent of the city’s population, blacks commit three-quarters of all shootings and 70 percent of all robberies, according to victims and witnesses. (Whites, by contrast, commit less than 2 percent of all shootings in New York City and 4 percent of all robberies, though they are nearly 34 percent of the population.)


In 2015, the police fatally shot 36 unarmed black males, according to The Washington Post’s typology, and 31 unarmed white males. The Post’s classification of victims as “unarmed” is literally accurate but sometimes misleading. The label can fail to convey the charged situation facing the officer who used deadly force.
At least five “unarmed” black victims had tried to grab the officer’s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. One had the officer on the ground and was beating him on the head so violently, breaking bones and causing other injuries, as to risk the officer’s loss of consciousness. And one individual included in the Post’s “unarmed black male victim” category was a bystander unintentionally struck by an officer’s bullet after an illegal-gun trafficker opened fire at the officer and the officer shot back. If a victim was not the intended target of a police shooting, race could have had no possible role in his death.


But but but......muh, racism!!!
:CryingCow:
 
Eight officers, so 60 rounds, that's about 7-8 bullets fired per cop. In a panicked situation, with the guy already shooting at them and in a ski mask, I can see how the officers panicked.


I find it funny how the city calls this heartbreaking.

The guy was wearing a ski mask, and had already shot at them. This was a bad guy. You know, like a criminal?
Panic? Or is it just freaking fed up? Either is fine with me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top