Mark Judge denies gang rape party accusations as “bizarre” and “outlandish”
In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Friday, Mark Judge, denied the latest round of accusations brought against him and Kavanaugh by Julie Swetnick—the client of Stormy Daniels’ attorney Michael Avenatti.
Swetnick accused Kavanaugh and Judge of making unwanted sexual addo!
nces at women while at parties in high school in the early 1980s, drugging the “punch” at parties, and participating in “gang rapes” and “train rapes.” Swetnick claims she is a victim of gang rape, and said that both Judge and Kavanaugh were there to watch the incident.
“In response to the Committee’s request for information, I, MARK JUDGE, declare: The allegations in the Swetnick affidavit are so bizarre that, even while suffering from my addiction, I would remember actions so outlandish. I categorically deny them,” Judge, a recovering alcoholic, said in the letter.
(Excerpt) Read more at
legalinsurrection.com ..
"I went to a party with these guys. At this party a girl got gang raped.
The next time I went to another party with these guys another girl got gang raped.
The next time after that I went to another party with these guys and I got gang raped.
Then I went to seven more parties with them, and at every one of them some girl got gang raped.
As all this was going on I was afraid to call the cops or anything. I just didn't know what to do!
I want a quick but complete investigation. The FBI should interview everyone that Ford claims was there.
The FBI should also retrieve Christine Blasey Ford’s texts and emails since 2008 and search those records for references to Supreme Court nominations in general and Kavanaugh in particular. That way if there is some material fact she mentioned electronically, but intentionally or inadvertently omitted from her testimony, the FBI will be able to supply the missing parts of her story to the Senate.
I’m not prejudging her case. It’s perfectly reasonable that someone with so many gaps in her memory could have mentioned something relevant in the past decade or so and then forgotten it. This would provide a more complete set of facts. Also, reviewing her electronic communications would provide an opportunity to refute the unlikely(?) allegations that her claims were a democrat conspiracy to derail Kavanaugh’s nomination.
My bet? That part of the investigation would get interesting results - proof of perjury, collusion, and general corruption.