Official global temperature records systematically "adjusted" to show warming

[Little-Acorn]

For more than 40 years, liberal hysterics have been stridently announcing that man has been causing the alarming global warming shown in official records. and all with no proof that man had anything to do with it.

And now we are finding that even the global records themselves, have been faked.

Have these people ever told the truth about ANYTHING?

------------------------------------------------

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

New data shows that the “vanishing” of polar ice is not the result of runaway global warming

by Christopher Booker
10:15PM GMT 07 Feb 2015

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

 

[BlindBoo]

Sceptics Hall of Shame Campaign against Climate Change

The superhuman cock-ups of Christopher Booker George Monbiot Environment The Guardian

 

[Kosh]

Sceptics Hall of Shame Campaign against Climate Change

The superhuman cock-ups of Christopher Booker George Monbiot Environment The Guardian

Yes the far left /AGW cult must continue to push their religion on others even though it has zero science to back it up..

 

[Little-Acorn]

Manmade Global Warming has no factual backing whatsoever.

In truth, climates frequently change.

Sometimes the climate gets warmer.

And sometimes it gets colder.

That's been going on for as long as the planet has been orbiting the Sun. Or, as long as it's had a climate, at least.

And man has never had the slightest influence on it.

Even the leftist loons who scream about how we have to use government to change everything, go back to the stone age, etc., to prevent some unknown catastrophe, have never been able to come up with even ONE study or example that backs up their claims.

What's funny is that, when they do name some study, it invariably turns out to be nothing but a bunch of long-winded claims which, finally, refer to some other "study" for proof. And what is in that other "study"? You guessed it - more long-winded claims, and eventually a reference to yet another study. And you can guess what is in that one, too.

The leftist global-whatever loons have been insisting on impending doom, and the urgent need to give government massive powers to change every bit of our lives to "avoid" that doom, for at least 40 years by my count. Literally billions of dollars have changed hands - usually into their hands - all over the world. And they still haven't come up with one shred of proof that man has had the least bit of influence on the climate changes that happen regularly around us. Nor is there any proof that man can do anything to change it.

***40 YEARS*** of screaming, caterwauling, and doomsaying. All without the slightest proof. Just references to references to references, ad infinitum. And demands that they be given complete power over all of us, to change what they cannot change.

Is this a record?

(Probably not. Leftist loons have been with us a LONG time. )

 

[MisterBeale]

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/surface_temp.pdf

"SECOND WARMEST YEAR (NASA), WARMEST DECADE EVER (NOAA)–NONSENSE!

Should you believe NOAA/NASA/HADLEY rankings for month and year? Definitively NO!

Climate change is real, there are cooling and warming periods that can be shown to correlate nicely with solar and ocean cycles. You can trust in the data that shows there has been warming from 1979 to 1998, just as there was warming around 1920 to 1940. But there has been cooling from 1940 to the late 1970s and since 2001. It is the long term trend on which this cyclical pattern is superimposed that is exaggerated.

As shown, record highs in North America show the cyclical pattern but suggest the 1930s to 1940 peak was higher than the recent peak around 1998. Recent ranking was very likely exaggerated by the numerous data issues discussed. Given these data issues and the inconvenient truths in the Climategate emails, the claim that the 2000s was the warmest decade in a millennium or two is ludicrous.

These factors all lead to significant uncertainty and a tendency for overestimation of century-scale temperature trends. An obvious conclusion from all findings above and the case studies that follow is that the global data bases are seriously flawed and can no longer be trusted to assess climate trends. And, consequently, such surface data should not be used for decision making."

 

[Little-Acorn]

Hardly a surprise, the liberals have been doing this for years.

Wasn't that around the same time Obama was telling us "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, PERIOD"? And that Obamacare would lower costs?

 

[jwoodie]

Sceptics Hall of Shame Campaign against Climate Change

The superhuman cock-ups of Christopher Booker George Monbiot Environment The Guardian

Yes the far left /AGW cult must continue to push their religion on others even though it has zero science to back it up..

This is why "Global Warming" has been replaced with "Climate Change."

 

[Little-Acorn]

Looks like the liberals have lost this debate so many times, and so badly, that they don't even want to participate in it any more.

That's progress.

 

[Kosh]

Sceptics Hall of Shame Campaign against Climate Change

The superhuman cock-ups of Christopher Booker George Monbiot Environment The Guardian

Yes the far left /AGW cult must continue to push their religion on others even though it has zero science to back it up..

This is why "Global Warming" has been replaced with "Climate Change."

Actually now it is "Climate Disruption" as they have made all the other terms moot. In about another 5 years they will have to invent a new name..

 

[Clementine]

In the 70's, the liberals were sounding the alarms about global cooling and insisting that government must do something.

Alinsky would be proud to see so many taking his advice. The liberals want government control, many even want a one world order. To get there, it's necessary to come up with a crisis that involves the entire planet rather than the usual issues each country faces. Once they establish a crisis and convince enough people that one exists, they can do whatever they want in the name of saving the earth. Can't think of a more noble cause, right? Never mind that their solutions are nothing more than a huge power grab by government and the most massive wealth redistribution in the history of the world. And the climate will remain the same. Only difference will be the power and money shift, which is the real goal behind virtually every liberal scheme. Alinsky and Cloward-Piven advised the left to create policies and claim they are for the greater good. The policies don't actually make things better, but claiming benevolence allows them to impugn those who disagree with them by calling them uncaring, greedy or mean. War on poverty created more poor. Government control over the private sector strangles capitalism. It's all by design. By lying about the purpose of their plans, they successfully slander opponents by painting them as non-caring when they don't go along.

In schools now, the teachers are telling young kids that the Republicans think helping poor people is a waste of money and only Dems think people should read whatever they want. Seriously. This is part of the same plan. They teach that Dems do things for the greater good and that sacrifice on our part is necessary. Of course, all the sacrificing we've done already has only resulted in bigger problems and less liberty. That is the whole plan.

Global warming, er climate change, er climate disruption is being taught to our children along with the other bullshit. The left wants people trusting government absolutely on everything from gun control to their supposed quest to save the earth. They do this by instilling fear in the children at an early age. Be afraid of those who support gun rights, capitalism and oppose liberal policies like global warming and a nanny state government. Got to get them while they are young. Must teach children that they shouldn't listen to their parents and only trust teachers. Liberals have said that the children belong to the state, not the parents and it's the state who should call the shots. Liberals have slowly taken over the role of parenting and too many idiots are okay with that.

Global warming is the jewel in the crown of the liberal plan to transfer all power from the people to government.

Here's a sample of what some liberal teachers are doing to poison the minds of our youth. This is designed to get kids not to trust anyone but liberals. They like to brainwash the kids when they are young. And liberal teachers will claim that their opinions on everything from guns to global warming are not up for debate. That's because bullshit doesn't hold up under scrutiny.


A teacher in a Wisconsin school is trying to teach children that Republicans think helping the poor is a waste of money and that only Democrats think people should read what they want. What a crock of shit. Liberals are holding themselves out as the only good people and are convincing children that the right is something to fear. It's insane.

This is just wrong, but an example of how liberals are trying to indoctrinate young students into becoming future sheep.

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/02/248171-heres-happened-student-bucked-prejudices-teacher/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Education