PLYMCO_PILGRIM
Gold Member
This guy is a big player in the formation of our new health care system that is being proposed and I've been hearing all sorts of scary rumors about him for a while now. Just recently an article was posted referring to some stuff he said in the Journal Of American Medicine. I would pull his JAMA article and post it but you have to pay 15 bucks to get into the site and i don't feel like doing it. However, I don't have to as the Wall Street Journal Did it For me.
This guy's idea in theory makes total sense. However it would not only be unethical but immoral to put his ideas into practice. His idea is called the "Total Life System"
"Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality of care are merely 'lipstick' cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change." -Emanuel
"However, other things are rarely equalwhether to save one 20-year-old, who might live another 60 years, if saved, or three 70-year-olds, who could only live for another 10 years eachis unclear." In fact, Dr. Emanuel makes a clear choice: "When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get changes that are attenuated (see chart below)
That language, while making sense intellectually, sounds totally immoral to me.
Betsy McCaughey: Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel Wants Health-Care Rationing - WSJ.com
This guy's idea in theory makes total sense. However it would not only be unethical but immoral to put his ideas into practice. His idea is called the "Total Life System"
"Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality of care are merely 'lipstick' cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change." -Emanuel
"However, other things are rarely equalwhether to save one 20-year-old, who might live another 60 years, if saved, or three 70-year-olds, who could only live for another 10 years eachis unclear." In fact, Dr. Emanuel makes a clear choice: "When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get changes that are attenuated (see chart below)
That language, while making sense intellectually, sounds totally immoral to me.
Betsy McCaughey: Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel Wants Health-Care Rationing - WSJ.com