I believe you're trying to imply that Bush doesn't deserve the blame for the 2008 stock market crash. However, he was president for almost 8 years before it happened, so he gets at least 80% of the blame.
Republicans have always been strong advocates of financial deregulation....and that is the #1 cause of the stock market crash. Bush's entire presidency was about deregulation, he did a ton of damage to our government, especially the EPA.
Reckless gambling by the giant Wall Street banks in the derivatives market for mortgages is what caused the 2008 crash, as discussed in the great book and movie The Big Short.
The repeal of the Glass Steagall Act in 1999, which prevented commercial banks from engaging in investment bank activities, was also a major cause. And that is why I don't place all the blame on Bush.
Glass Steagall Act in 1999
"Dead" Law: By 1999, many argued the Act was already circumvented by regulatory loopholes, making the legislation a formal recognition of existing market shifts
.
The 1999 repeal of the
Glass-Steagall Act via the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act did not directly cause the 2008 subprime crisis, a
s the core issues were bad mortgage underwriting and securitization, not the merger of commercial and investment banking. While it allowed larger financial institutions,
key failures involved entities not primarily affected by the merger restrictions.
24 OF THE 25 BIGGEST MORTGAGE ORIGINATORS IN 2006, WERE NOT SUBJECT TO MOST BANKING REGS. It was mortgage brokers, backed by wall street that caused it, banks, like Fannie/Freddie jumped on it because they saw $$$$
Another form of easing facilitated the rapid rise of mortgages that didn't require borrowers to fully document their incomes. In 2006, these low- or no-doc loans comprised 81 percent of near-prime, 55 percent of jumbo, 50 percent of subprime and 36 percent of prime securitized mortgages."
After booming the first half of this decade, US housing activity has retrenched sharply. Single-family building permits have plunged 52 percent and existing-home sales have declined 30 percent since their September 2005 peaks. ; A rise in mortgage
www.academia.edu
Q HOLY JESUS! DID YOU JUST PROVE THAT OVER 50 % OF ALL MORTGAGES IN 2006 DIDN'T REQUIRE BORROWERS TO DOCUMENT THEIR INCOME?!?!?!?
A Yes.
Q WHO THE HELL LOANS HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO PEOPLE WITHOUT CHECKING THEIR INCOMES?!?!?
A Banks.
Q WHY??!?!!!?!
A Two reasons, greed and Bush's regulators let them
And then they sold the loan and risk to investors and GSEs clamoring for the loans. Actually banks, pension funds, investment banks and other investors clamored for them. Bush forced Freddie and Fannie to buy an additional $440 billion in mortgages in the secondary market.
Q When did the Bush Mortgage Bubble start?
A The general timeframe is it started late 2004.
From Bushs Presidents Working Group on Financial Markets October 2008
The Presidents Working Groups March policy statement acknowledged that turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007.
Q Did the Community Reinvestment Act under Carter/Clinton caused it?
A "Since 1995 there has been essentially no change in the basic CRA rules or...