Actually, I did answer it.
but, no, it doesn't. non-fox news doesn't have a bone to pick with a president, either way they fall. Sometimes, and I know this blows your ******* mind, news programs do more drone on and on and on about how evil a (non-conservative) president is. I assure you, angry man, what you seek you will find at michellemalkin.com if you are not already stroking your meat to "I used to be news but that shit just isn't fun around here" Megyn.
My question had nothing to do with Fox...so leave it out of your answer....becuase it leads you to AGAIN not answering the question.
SO I will ask a third way......
Does a news service that markets itself as an up to date news service with all of the news have the responsibility to report on the apparent forced resignation of a high level FDA appointee when the forced resignation is based on an accusation of racism?
Do you need some hot blond chick spoon feeding you vitriol to believe that my answer to you is, in fact, my answer to you?
A news organization, now I'm speaking of ACTUAL news organizations so you can put your masterbating hand away as I'll not be bringing up fox, has an obligation to report on a wide range of topics and, if what you call the MSM didn't leap on the ******* breitbart bandwagon fast enough for you then kudos to them given how that story turned out. Just because NBC didn't devote an hour to typical conservative shennanigans doesn't mean that they are less of a news source; they just don't have the OBVIOUS bone to pick that fox news does.
so, is that enough for you or do you want to go ahead and write my answer for me and hand it to some blond chick to read in between the hours of 1pm and 2?