Obama Shell-shocked By Trump Win

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The problem was not economy, the problem was, and still is, the intellectual depravity of the rightwing sphere. The movement is infested with cranks and charlatans leading the dupe horde into tinfoil laden nowhere.

Oh, brother. Jesus Buttfucking Christ.

What about Obama and the dipshit communist useful idiot left that got that goose-stepper elected?

The truth is that many Americans rejected the communist, America-hating bullshit that Obama masturbated to. Accept the facts, man.

We hate commies.

 

[Pop23]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

Obama and the Corrupt Democrat Politicians treat educated middle class voters as their enemy and Obama thought that they had permanently defeated them.
When the Left Wingers used the term "changing demographics" they are saying that the educated middle class voters who live in fly over country are going to become the minority and lose their voting power.

By changing demographics left wingers mean "ethnic cleansing" of whites, such as the one that took place in Detroit. The results do not look very good.

Correct. But the changing demographics will continue to haunt the left. No matter how you slice it, under an electoral system the dems have an uphill battle since they tend to group together is small areas of the country. If Obama was shocked at all it was simply because he wasn't paying attention to how the system worked. Clinton needed a 3.4% lead in the national polls to even have a 50% chance of winning the election because she was getting concentrated votes from a few populace States. Good for overall stats, not so hot with our system. There were a few of us that saw this on this board, you would have thought someone educated at Harvard would ave noted it as well.

 

[Fang]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

The economy that Trump was touting first day in office? That economy?

The problem was not economy, the problem was, and still is, the intellectual depravity of the rightwing sphere. The movement is infested with cranks and charlatans leading the dupe horde into tinfoil laden nowhere.

Somebody is still butt-hurt over November 2016... LOL

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

Obama and the Corrupt Democrat Politicians treat educated middle class voters as their enemy and Obama thought that they had permanently defeated them.
When the Left Wingers used the term "changing demographics" they are saying that the educated middle class voters who live in fly over country are going to become the minority and lose their voting power.

By changing demographics left wingers mean "ethnic cleansing" of whites, such as the one that took place in Detroit. The results do not look very good.

Correct. But the changing demographics will continue to haunt the left. No matter how you slice it, under an electoral system the dems have an uphill battle since they tend to group together is small areas of the country. If Obama was shocked at all it was simply because he wasn't paying attention to how the system worked. Clinton needed a 3.4% lead in the national polls to even have a 50% chance of winning the election because she was getting concentrated votes from a few populace States. Good for overall stats, not so hot with our system. There were a few of us that saw this on this board, you would have thought someone educated at Harvard would ave noted it as well.

Obama is not nearly as smart as the Left thinks that he is and Trump is not nearly as dumb as the Left thinks that he is

 

[Fang]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

Obama and the Corrupt Democrat Politicians treat educated middle class voters as their enemy and Obama thought that they had permanently defeated them.
When the Left Wingers used the term "changing demographics" they are saying that the educated middle class voters who live in fly over country are going to become the minority and lose their voting power.

By changing demographics left wingers mean "ethnic cleansing" of whites, such as the one that took place in Detroit. The results do not look very good.

Correct. But the changing demographics will continue to haunt the left. No matter how you slice it, under an electoral system the dems have an uphill battle since they tend to group together is small areas of the country. If Obama was shocked at all it was simply because he wasn't paying attention to how the system worked. Clinton needed a 3.4% lead in the national polls to even have a 50% chance of winning the election because she was getting concentrated votes from a few populace States. Good for overall stats, not so hot with our system. There were a few of us that saw this on this board, you would have thought someone educated at Harvard would ave noted it as well.

Please, stop posting reasonable, well thought out points. Liberals get confused when that happens and the insane behavior just increases.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Hillary lost because she ran a campaign based on telling the public "we hate you". Democrats intend their next campaign will have the same basis but much louder.

 

[Norman]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

Obama and the Corrupt Democrat Politicians treat educated middle class voters as their enemy and Obama thought that they had permanently defeated them.
When the Left Wingers used the term "changing demographics" they are saying that the educated middle class voters who live in fly over country are going to become the minority and lose their voting power.

By changing demographics left wingers mean "ethnic cleansing" of whites, such as the one that took place in Detroit. The results do not look very good.

Correct. But the changing demographics will continue to haunt the left. No matter how you slice it, under an electoral system the dems have an uphill battle since they tend to group together is small areas of the country. If Obama was shocked at all it was simply because he wasn't paying attention to how the system worked. Clinton needed a 3.4% lead in the national polls to even have a 50% chance of winning the election because she was getting concentrated votes from a few populace States. Good for overall stats, not so hot with our system. There were a few of us that saw this on this board, you would have thought someone educated at Harvard would ave noted it as well.

Please, stop posting reasonable, well thought out points. Liberals get confused when that happens and the insane behavior just increases.

Not really. The low IQ hordes will soon sweep over the country to such extent that this simply won't matter. Then everyone will be voting for free stuff and socialism. Texas will be turning blue in 2024, and after that in 2040 whites will become the minority and USA will continue the march to becoming a 3rd world African style nation.

There is still hope of course, the AR-15s put us into a good position in the negotiation table. Now you understand why gun grabbing is of most importance to the leftists.

 

[AntonToo]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

The economy that Trump was touting first day in office? That economy?

The problem was not economy, the problem was, and still is, the intellectual depravity of the rightwing sphere. The movement is infested with cranks and charlatans leading the dupe horde into tinfoil laden nowhere.

Somebody is still butt-hurt over November 2016... LOL

Little person, you have to learn that pointing out facts is not evidence of "butt-hurt".

I personally had no prob with Trump winning - this is a lesson America was overdue for. This is what electing blowhard clowns looks like.

 

[Fang]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

The economy that Trump was touting first day in office? That economy?

The problem was not economy, the problem was, and still is, the intellectual depravity of the rightwing sphere. The movement is infested with cranks and charlatans leading the dupe horde into tinfoil laden nowhere.

Somebody is still butt-hurt over November 2016... LOL

Little person, you have to learn that pointing out facts is not evidence of "butt-hurt".

I personally had no prob with Trump winning - this is a lesson America was overdue for. This is what electing blowhard clowns looks like.

No. You're butt-hurt. It's pretty easy to spot now. Sucks to be miserable every day. LOL

 

[AntonToo]

The problem was not economy, the problem was, and still is, the intellectual depravity of the rightwing sphere. The movement is infested with cranks and charlatans leading the dupe horde into tinfoil laden nowhere.

Oh, brother. Jesus Buttfucking Christ.

What about Obama and the dipshit communist useful idiot left that got that goose-stepper elected?

The truth is that many Americans rejected the communist, America-hating bullshit that Obama masturbated to. Accept the facts, man.

We hate commies.

Come on, you are hopped up on straight CRAZY and don't even seem to know what Communism IS.

Obama left office with 60%+ approval, is currently ranked by historians as the 12th best American president, and would no doubt easily get re-elected for a third term if he could run.

Trump is making Obama, and even Bush, look better and better everyday.

 

[AntonToo]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

The economy that Trump was touting first day in office? That economy?

The problem was not economy, the problem was, and still is, the intellectual depravity of the rightwing sphere. The movement is infested with cranks and charlatans leading the dupe horde into tinfoil laden nowhere.

Somebody is still butt-hurt over November 2016... LOL

Little person, you have to learn that pointing out facts is not evidence of "butt-hurt".

I personally had no prob with Trump winning - this is a lesson America was overdue for. This is what electing blowhard clowns looks like.

No. You're butt-hurt. It's pretty easy to spot now. Sucks to be miserable every day. LOL

Trumpsters crack me up - everything is rotated about some feely touchy personal nonsense.

 

[easyt65]

[QUOTE="August West, post: 20039717, member: 50970
You read books? That`s funny. You`ve got a nice list of imaginary crimes that she was never charged with after 25 years of investigations. Would you like to see 8 more Benghazi investigations?[/QUOTE]
I find it funny that your defense of Hillary's Proven crimes is that she never committed any crimes based on the fact that Obama and his criminal administration never indicted her for them, protected her so she could run for President.

Tell me, AW, if a govt worker is required by law to turn in every official document / e-mail / etc.. as per 2 laws governing them - the FOIA and Federal Records Act, non-compliance with those laws is a CRIME, is it not?

The FBI declared it found over 15,000 official documents Hillary had not turned in as required by the law. Her refusing to do so is a CRIME, is it not....or does the FOIA and the Federal Records Act simply not apply to Hillary Rodham Clinton?

The FBI also stated that they had RECOVERED many of those official documents ... after Hillary had 'accidently' attempted to destroy them / wipe them off of her server when she attempted to delete / Bleach Bit all of her 'personal' files prior to complying with the subpoena demanding she turn over her server and EVERYTHING on it. So not only did Hillary Clinton intentionally refuse to comply with those 2 laws, she also attempted to Obstruct Justice by destroying them so the FBI could not see them...which did not work.

Perhaps YOU should read more books and educate yourself.

Hillary's crimes were an open-and-shut case for any legal / law-abiding/enforcing administration / DOJ - '25 years' of investigations were not needed. 6 months of investigations were not needed.

The Obama administration was the most criminal in US History. Hillary was by far, though, the most criminal politician in US history.

 

[jon_berzerk]

the democrat party has become a horrible organization that has not much

if anything favorable for the common person

that is why they lost

that is why they will continue to lose

She had more votes than orange Jesus. The Electoral College is what he won.

illegal votes dont count

plus she got slammed in the electoral vote (which is what counts)

if you dont like it **** YOU

 

[August West]

[QUOTE="August West, post: 20039717, member: 50970
You read books? That`s funny. You`ve got a nice list of imaginary crimes that she was never charged with after 25 years of investigations. Would you like to see 8 more Benghazi investigations?

I find it funny that your defense of Hillary's Proven crimes is that she never committed any crimes based on the fact that Obama and his criminal administration never indicted her for them, protected her so she could run for President.

Tell me, AW, if a govt worker is required by law to turn in every official document / e-mail / etc.. as per 2 laws governing them - the FOIA and Federal Records Act, non-compliance with those laws is a CRIME, is it not?

The FBI declared it found over 15,000 official documents Hillary had not turned in as required by the law. Her refusing to do so is a CRIME, is it not....or does the FOIA and the Federal Records Act simply not apply to Hillary Rodham Clinton?

The FBI also stated that they had RECOVERED many of those official documents ... after Hillary had 'accidently' attempted to destroy them / wipe them off of her server when she attempted to delete / Bleach Bit all of her 'personal' files prior to complying with the subpoena demanding she turn over her server and EVERYTHING on it. So not only did Hillary Clinton intentionally refuse to comply with those 2 laws, she also attempted to Obstruct Justice by destroying them so the FBI could not see them...which did not work.

Perhaps YOU should read more books and educate yourself.

Hillary's crimes were an open-and-shut case for any legal / law-abiding/enforcing administration / DOJ - '25 years' of investigations were not needed. 6 months of investigations were not needed.

The Obama administration was the most criminal in US History. Hillary was by far, though, the most criminal politician in US history.[/QUOTE]
This is pretty strong stupid you have going here. You`re still looking for an Obama or Hillary Clinton scandal? Good luck with that. I thought orange Jesus was going to have her locked up for something. Getting 3 million more votes isn`t a crime.

 

[easyt65]

This is pretty strong stupid you have going here.

If it is so 'stupid' why did you RUN FROM / REFUSE ro answer the question, snowflake?

Refusal to comply with law is committing a crime.

Hillary was required by law to turn in every single official document.
She not only refused to comply with the law she attempted to obstruct justice - to hide the evidence by deleting the documents...that the FBI were able to recover anyway.

The FBI declared they recovered over 15,000 OFFICIAL Govt-related documents from Hillary's server which she failed to turn is as required by the law.

So again, AW, why does US Law NOT apply to Hillary Clinton as you claim it does not?

What is 'pretty strong stupid' is attempting to claim these over 30,000 individual criminal counts / violations of the Freedom Of Information Act and Federal Records Act do not apply to Hillary Rodham Clinton.

 

[August West]

This is pretty strong stupid you have going here.

If it is so 'stupid' why did you RUN FROM / REFUSE ro answer the question, snowflake?

Refusal to comply with law is committing a crime.

Hillary was required by law to turn in every single official document.
She not only refused to comply with the law she attempted to obstruct justice - to hide the evidence by deleting the documents...that the FBI were able to recover anyway.

The FBI declared they recovered over 15,000 OFFICIAL Govt-related documents from Hillary's server which she failed to turn is as required by the law.

So again, AW, why does US Law NOT apply to Hillary Clinton as you claim it does not?

What is 'pretty strong stupid' is attempting to claim these over 30,000 individual criminal counts / violations of the Freedom Of Information Act and Federal Records Act do not apply to Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Call the guy in the Whitehouse with your stupid shit and hold him to his promise to "lock her up".

 

[easyt65]

[QUOTE="August West, post: 20040970, member: 50970
Call the guy in the Whitehouse with your stupid shit and hold him to his promise to "lock her up".[/QUOTE]
AW, since this is easy stuff (no pun intended) you should be able to provide a straight answer to a very simple question. Instead we have to watch you flip flop like a fish hauled in and dropped on the bottom of the boat, squirm, squeal, and run like an evasive greased pig at a country fair....

It's ok...EVERYONE ALREADY KNOWS that this is as easy (again, no pun intended) as it gets in identifying and acknowledging a crime.

The Law says 'You are legally required to and will turn in all official documents under penalty of law for refusing to comply'.

Hillary refused to do so.

The FBI found over 15,000 official documents she never turned in - more than 15,000 pieces of EVDENCE of her CRIME...and reported it to the world.

Deep down you KNOW she broke the law...MANY laws...but you rabid partisanship refuses to acknowledge what everyone else sees and accepts.

I actually feel sad for you, that you have given your loyalty to such criminals who FORCE you to embarrass yourself like this, forcing you to refuse to admit /accept something so simple.

Good luck with that.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama told aides, according to the memoir. “Maybe we pushed too far. ... Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

Pretty interesting read on Obama and his aids after Trumps win. I'm not sure I would agree Obama pushed to far or was to early. I think Democrats were just to confident and forgot what was really important. Bill Clinton and James Carville told us in 1992 "It's the economy stupid". Hence, Trump nails the flyover states and middle class areas.

Obama was shell-shocked by Trump win, asked 'What if we were wrong?,' new book says

Obama said "Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe”
That is astounding hypocrisy coming from Obama because the Democratic Party/Press/Hollywood relentlessly works to divide Americans by race, gender, income class, religion, region….etc.
The Democrats are the Party of cultural division.

 

[iceberg]

Hillary lost because she ran a campaign based on telling the public "we hate you". Democrats intend their next campaign will have the same basis but much louder.

well i do believe they've learned from their mistakes and they're going for WE HATE YOU A LOT NOW as their tactic.

however, if you back up a bit and just "watch" the game vs. scream at either side, you'll see people starting to apologize and realize they've gone too far.

it's the beginning of finding that line and coming back to some sense of "together" we may yet still find again. if we are on that path, any hate filled agenda is going to get slapped down even harder by people tired of it as their daily message. that will go for either side who continues to engage in identity politics of hate.

people are tired of hating all the time and are tuning it out and realizing their role in it.

so good to see but we're still a long long way from home.