Because forcing someone to spend a few bucks and do a sensible thing is just like working 16 hours a day in the blazing sun picking cotton for no pay.
Do you people really expect to be taken seriously with that argument?
It's against the constitution to FORCE anyone to buy something they don't want or get taxed (fined) for it if they don't. And yes it can be compared to slavery...people are being forced against their will to do something they don't want to do. But all Lovebear was saying is just because it's a law, doesn't mean it can't be changed.
Another ignorant conservative chimes in.
Please cite the actual language in the ACA where one is ‘forced’ to buy anything. Please cite the actual language in the ACA where one is subject to criminal prosecution and ‘fined.’
Congress has appropriately used its taxing authority, as sanctioned by the Constitution, to encourage the purchasing of health insurance, as it has done in the past with other similar measures:
Whether the mandate can be upheld under the Commerce Clause is a question about the scope of federal authority. Its answer depends on whether Congress can exercise what all acknowledge to be the novel course of directing individuals to purchase insurance.
Congress’s use of the Taxing Clause to encourage buying something is, by contrast, not new. Tax incentives already promote, for example, purchasing homes and professional educations. See 26 U. S. C. §§163(h), 25A. Sustaining the mandate as a tax depends only on whether Congress has properly exercised its taxing power to encourage purchasing health insurance, not whether it can.
Upholding the individual mandate under the Taxing Clause thus does not recognize any new federal power. It determines that Congress has used an existing one.
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS v. SEBELIUS | Supreme Court | LII / Legal Information Institute
Clearly opposition to the ACA is purely partisan, having nothing to do whatsoever with the facts or merits of the Act.
And no one is arguing that the ACA can’t be changed; again, conservatives are at liberty to attempt to change or repeal the Act through any appropriate, Constitutional means they wish – that they’ve failed to do so, however, is not justification for the radical right to hold the country hostage by shutting down the government and threatening its economic well being.