Obama Responds To Trump's Claim

[Dr Grump]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

You're joking right?

No. Give us the proof. Just because The Orange Buffoon says something doesn't mean it's true. In fact, you can almost guarantee he lies abut 50 percent of the time he opens his big, fat gob.

 

[Dr Grump]

all it takes is a hint or suggestion to get political operatives to do dirty work.

Note to boedicca - The Bourne Series of books and movies are fiction....

 

[boedicca]

all it takes is a hint or suggestion to get political operatives to do dirty work.

Note to boedicca - The Bourne Series of books and movies are fiction....

Note to Dr Grump: I'm discussing reality. Hardy a surprise that you can't distinguish fiction from reality.

 

[Dr Grump]

Note to Dr Grump: I'm discussing reality. Hardy a surprise that you can't distinguish fiction from reality.

No you're not. You're discussing Fake News. In fact, it's probably not even that. It's just shit you're spewing on your keyboard with nothing to back it up but your opinion. A Deplorable indeed.

 

[boedicca]

Note to Dr Grump: I'm discussing reality. Hardy a surprise that you can't distinguish fiction from reality.

No you're not. You're discussing Fake News. In fact, it's probably not even that. It's just shit you're spewing on your keyboard with nothing to back it up but your opinion. A Deplorable indeed.

^^^ Sore LoserXyr ^^^

 

[Dr Grump]

^^^ Sore LoserXyr ^^^

Ah, the ad hom....I have nothing so I'll just 'ad hom;.

Talking of losers....

 

[Montrovant]

"Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.


Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?

These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.

Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.

How bout James Rosen?

Toro, you're a blooming idiot and everyone knows it.

Obamakov didn't know about IRS targeting and surveillance. BIG FAT LIE

Obamakov didn't know about Justice Department surveillance of James Rosen. BIG FAT LIE

Obamakov didn't know about Fast and Furious. BIG FAT LIE

Looks like you're the idiot who believes everything Obamakov tells you.

You appear to have just called Toro an idiot while quoting Grampa Murked U.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Apparently, Trump is in a Time Warp. He thinks that Obama is Nixon, or maybe J. Edgar Hoover is still in charge of the FBI.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Yep. They have made certain to disclaim he knows anything at any time. Most uninformed Prez of my lifetime. Lol

"Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.


Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?

These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.

Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.

You idiots will believe anything Trump tells you.

lol

Toro, you're a blooming idiot and everyone knows it.

Obamakov didn't know about IRS targeting and surveillance. BIG FAT LIE

Obamakov didn't know about Justice Department surveillance of James Rosen. BIG FAT LIE

Obamakov didn't know about Fast and Furious. BIG FAT LIE

Looks like you're the idiot who believes everything Obamakov tells you.

He learned what was going on from seeing it on CNN.

That could explain how ill informed he was for eight years

 

[Vandalshandle]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

You're joking right?

No. Give us the proof. Just because The Orange Buffoon says something doesn't mean it's true. In fact, you can almost guarantee he lies abut 50 percent of the time he opens his big, fat gob.

I'm pretty sure that Trump will claim, next that Obama left a ring around the tub, and toothpaste in the basin.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What the freaking **** is an "Obama spokesman".

A stooge

 

[BULLDOG]

"Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.


Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?

These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.

Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.

"NEVER ORDERED"

That's what's called plausible deniability.

Like Fast and Furious
IRS targeting
Spying on journalists

Bush didn't "ORDER WATERBOARDING"...but that didn't stop the Dems from lying that he did.

In his book, titled "Decision Points," Bush recounts being asked by the CIA whether it could proceed with waterboarding Mohammed, who Bush said was suspected of knowing about still-pending terrorist plots against the United States. Bush writes that his reply was "Damn right" and states that he would make the same decision again

That's not "ORDERING".

How is asking the same as ordering.

Here is an example:

"Little Johnny, GO CLEAN YOUR ROOM!!" is an order.

"Little Johnny, do you want to clean your room?" is a question.

Did Obama "ORDER" spying on journalists by the CIA?

You got any proof that he did?

Yes. POTUS is responsible for everything that happens during their term, right?

I had a flat on my truck. DAMN YOU TRUMP!!!!

 

[boedicca]

Obama lied again:


In Chapter 36 of Title 50 of the US Code *War and National Defense", Subchapter 1, Section 1802, we read the following:

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;

(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and

(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.

While (B) seems to contradict the underlying permissive nature of Section 1802 as it involves a United States person, what the Snowden affair has demonstrated all too clearly, is how frequently the NSA and FISA court would make US citizens collateral damage. To be sure, many pointed out the fact that Fox News correspondent James Rosen was notoriously wiretapped in 2013 when the DOJ was investigating government leaks. The Associated Press was also infamously wiretapped in relation to the same investigation.

Obama Advisor Rhodes Is Wrong: The President Can Order A Wiretap, And Why Trump May Have The Last Laugh | Zero Hedge

 

[bodecea]

No denial. Suggestion of the doj. Right there.

One FISA warrant was requested in June 2016. The request was too broad in scope and was denied. The new FISA request was far narrower and was granted.

Who is being un freaking Presidential here?

Could you provide a link? I'll look at the context. And Trump said that Obama tapped his phones, so he has set a standard here.
.

What could a "link" prove?

I'd like to see evidence that Trump supporters are using as proof. I'd like to see the source of the information. I'd like follow their sources to determine context and accuracy.

Was this a trick question?
.

So you're taking Obama's denial as proof that he did it?

Is that it? Is that your proof?
.

That's how it works in ODSstan.

 

[Mac1958]

With all the silly shit Trump has "tweeted", this goes to a new level.

A sitting President accusing the previous President of committing a crime. That is a serious, historic event.

He'd better have solid proof. Either way, it's almost as if he still doesn't realize he's President. He clearly doesn't have much respect for the office.
.

Why does he need proof, democrats don't ever need any proof


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd like to think that "well, they do it too" is something most of us outgrow at some point.
.