Lakhota
Diamond Member
Where's the proof? Give us some proof.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, please. Quit covering for him. The doj was part of his administration.It really reduces your credibility when you try to carry the water for their spin. Or you just don't give a damn. And if that's the case, remember there is a rep in there now which could pull the same crap. Unless you would be ok with that... Which is it?"Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.
Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?
These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.
Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.
No, he didn't deny the warrant. He just wasn't the one who requested it. Trump is the little kid with chocolate icing on his face and hands telling his mommy that he hasn't been near the cake.
I wouldn't put it past Trump trying to do something like he is accusing Obama of, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't work like that. The president is not King, and doesn't have the authority to order something like that.
"Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.
Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?
These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.
Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.
"NEVER ORDERED""Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.
Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?
These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.
Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.
That's what's called plausible deniability.
Like Fast and Furious
IRS targeting
Spying on journalists
Bush didn't "ORDER WATERBOARDING"...but that didn't stop the Dems from lying that he did.
maybe in a mafioso trump white house..."Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.
Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?
These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.
Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.
How Clintonian. It all depends upon what the meaning of "ORDERED" is. The Obama Administration extended far beyond the White House...and all it takes is a hint or suggestion to get political operatives to do dirty work.
Steve McGarrett chiming in. Want to know how big this is?
Watch the whole segment.
So you're taking Obama's denial as proof that he did it?![]()
No denial. Suggestion of the doj. Right there.
I'd like to see evidence that Trump supporters are using as proof. I'd like to see the source of the information. I'd like follow their sources to determine context and accuracy.What could a "link" prove?Could you provide a link? I'll look at the context. And Trump said that Obama tapped his phones, so he has set a standard here.
.
Was this a trick question?
.
Is that it? Is that your proof?
.
Are you taking a silly Breitbart article as proof? That is where Trump is getting his info.
Steve McGarrett chiming in. Want to know how big this is?
Watch the whole segment.
So you're taking Obama's denial as proof that he did it?![]()
No denial. Suggestion of the doj. Right there.
I'd like to see evidence that Trump supporters are using as proof. I'd like to see the source of the information. I'd like follow their sources to determine context and accuracy.What could a "link" prove?
Was this a trick question?
.
Is that it? Is that your proof?
.
Are you taking a silly Breitbart article as proof? That is where Trump is getting his info.
No Mark Levin investigated the two FISA requests. One in June that was denied because it was too broad in scope and the second in October which was granted.
BTW more that Brietbart are reporting on the FISA requests.
IF the FBI got a FISA Warrant, they would get it on their own, with showing PROBABLE CAUSE, to a Judge, who agreed the warrant is warranted.

"NEVER ORDERED""Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.
Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?
These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.
Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.
That's what's called plausible deniability.
Like Fast and Furious
IRS targeting
Spying on journalists
Bush didn't "ORDER WATERBOARDING"...but that didn't stop the Dems from lying that he did.
In his book, titled "Decision Points," Bush recounts being asked by the CIA whether it could proceed with waterboarding Mohammed, who Bush said was suspected of knowing about still-pending terrorist plots against the United States. Bush writes that his reply was "Damn right" and states that he would make the same decision again
So you're taking Obama's denial as proof that he did it?![]()
No denial. Suggestion of the doj. Right there.
I'd like to see evidence that Trump supporters are using as proof. I'd like to see the source of the information. I'd like follow their sources to determine context and accuracy.What could a "link" prove?
Was this a trick question?
.
Is that it? Is that your proof?
.
Are you taking a silly Breitbart article as proof? That is where Trump is getting his info.
No Mark Levin investigated the two FISA requests. One in June that was denied because it was too broad in scope and the second in October which was granted.
BTW more that Brietbart are reporting on the FISA requests.
So you're taking Obama's denial as proof that he did it?![]()
No denial. Suggestion of the doj. Right there.
I'd like to see evidence that Trump supporters are using as proof. I'd like to see the source of the information. I'd like follow their sources to determine context and accuracy.
Was this a trick question?
.
Is that it? Is that your proof?
.
Are you taking a silly Breitbart article as proof? That is where Trump is getting his info.
No Mark Levin investigated the two FISA requests. One in June that was denied because it was too broad in scope and the second in October which was granted.
BTW more that Brietbart are reporting on the FISA requests.
Levin? That whiny little *****? He's about as credible as Alex Jones..
Wouldn't respect for the office also include quietly and seamlessly handing over the reigns to the next guy that won? And not trying to sabotage him and his new administration?With all the silly shit Trump has "tweeted", this goes to a new level.
A sitting President accusing the previous President of committing a crime. That is a serious, historic event.
He'd better have solid proof. Either way, it's almost as if he still doesn't realize he's President. He clearly doesn't have much respect for the office.
.
"NEVER ORDERED""Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said in a statement.
Our ex-idiot in chief lying his ass off again. Hey, moron, does the name Snowden ring any bells in your pointy little head?
These corrupt libtardos are going to get picked apart by Trump on all their criminal activity. Trump has committed no crimes and the Obamakov sycophants in the intelligence community committed a crime leaking the phone calls by Flynn.
Notice Obamakov didn't deny the FISA warrant. Pretend not to notice.
That's what's called plausible deniability.
Like Fast and Furious
IRS targeting
Spying on journalists
Bush didn't "ORDER WATERBOARDING"...but that didn't stop the Dems from lying that he did.
In his book, titled "Decision Points," Bush recounts being asked by the CIA whether it could proceed with waterboarding Mohammed, who Bush said was suspected of knowing about still-pending terrorist plots against the United States. Bush writes that his reply was "Damn right" and states that he would make the same decision again
That's not "ORDERING".
How is asking the same as ordering.
Here is an example:
"Little Johnny, GO CLEAN YOUR ROOM!!" is an order.
"Little Johnny, do you want to clean your room?" is a question.
Did Obama "ORDER" spying on journalists by the CIA?
Wouldn't respect for the office also include quietly and seamlessly handing over the reigns to the next guy that won? And not trying to sabotage him and his new administration?With all the silly shit Trump has "tweeted", this goes to a new level.
A sitting President accusing the previous President of committing a crime. That is a serious, historic event.
He'd better have solid proof. Either way, it's almost as if he still doesn't realize he's President. He clearly doesn't have much respect for the office.
.