The best deal is worse then no deal when dealing with terrorism. All I need as proof is that they changed their vote. Nothing else has changed. This is a vote on Obama's legacy. Letting a sworn enemy, an enemy that has sworn to continue to fund terrorism against us just does not make sense. Except to try and preserve some sort of legacy for Obama and I am afraid that legacy will be a suitcase nuke.
It is the best deal Neville Chamberlain Kerry and Obama can get.
Guy, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Ronnie Reagan called Osama bin Laden a "Freedom Fighter" when he was killing Russians trying to teach Afghan Girls how to read. He only became a "terrorist" when he was knocking down buildings filled with corporate types.
So let's stop the whining about "Terrorism", shall we?
This is a good deal in that it gives us grounds to take action if Iran cheats. It's a good deal in that it gives us the ability to inspect Iran's activities.
The Jew Lobby isn't worried IRan will get a nuke. They've been claiming Iran is on the cusp of getting a nuke since 1992, and Iran is no closer now than they were then.
The Jew Lobby is worried Iran will work its way back into polite international society. That they will have to encounter Iranian Diplomats at UN Functions discussing what to do about the Middle East.