Obama now has 34 Senators supporting the Iran Deal - GOP will not be able to block it

[whutTHEYsay]

MP 12226976

Problem with this is that when it bites us in the ass, and it will, the left is going to point at the republican majority and put full blame on them for it.

What about this diplomatic deal can bite us in the ass? And it was not just us. Sanctions were not stopping Iran in the least from moving forward with nuclear development.

 

[eagle1462010]

No future President will have to Honor the deal...............

If it's not voted as a treaty with 2/3rd's of the Senate approving...................then by the Constitution we can shred it..................which is all it is worth........except for the Billions offered by the current Numb Nuts in Office.

 

[guno]

Obama secures Iran nuclear deal with Barbara Mikulski vote - CNNPolitics.com

In a major victory for President Barack Obama, Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland announced support for the Iran nuclear deal Wednesday, providing the White House the votes it needs to prevent Republicans from scuttling the agreement.

The announcement means that at least 34 senators -- the number required by the Constitution to sustain a veto -- will back Obama's expected veto of a Republican resolution to disapprove of the deal. Mikulski is retiring at the end of her term.

While majorities of both the GOP-controlled House and Senate are poised to vote against the agreement, supporters of the multinational accord that aims to curb Iran's nuclear weapons program are also hoping to get the 41 votes needed to filibuster the bill and prevent it from even getting to a final vote in the Senate.

Secretary of State John Kerry said the administration will continue to try and push support for deal past the 34 votes they now have "until the last moment."

"Thirty-four votes are obviously enough votes for the president's veto to be upheld," Kerry told CNN's Christiane Amanpour. "That is not satisfactory for us. We do want to try to go further. We'll continue to persuade."

Obama's expected veto of the GOP effort to derail the Iran deal will therefore be sustained.

The GOP has lost this battle.

Traditionally, once the 34th vote comes on board, a couple of others do as well, so I expect this will climb to at least 36.

End of story.

Looks like the bible thumpers just had another end times fantasy taken away from them

 

[guno]

No future President will have to Honor the deal...............

If it's not voted as a treaty with 2/3rd's of the Senate approving...................then by the Constitution we can shred it..................which is all it is worth........except for the Billions offered by the current Numb Nuts in Office.

And you really thing a white christian party member will be elected nationally?

 

[eagle1462010]

No future President will have to Honor the deal...............

If it's not voted as a treaty with 2/3rd's of the Senate approving...................then by the Constitution we can shred it..................which is all it is worth........except for the Billions offered by the current Numb Nuts in Office.

And you really thing a white christian party member will be elected nationally?

So says the one that will vote for the Hildabeast...............

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Uncensored 12222578

I'm not sure you got anything right in that post. ISIS is not Wahhabi.

How can you not know the truth about Daessh Terrorist Scum,

.
27 NOVEMBER 2014
Wahhabism to ISIS: how Saudi Arabia exported the main source of global terrorism
Although IS is certainly an Islamic movement, it is neither typical nor mired in the distant past, because its roots are in Wahhabism, a form of Islam practised in Saudi Arabia that developed only in the 18th century.
BY KAREN ARMSTRONG

Wahhabism to ISIS: how Saudi Arabia exported the main source of global terrorism



Read the full article. IS was strengthened by the U.S. Invasion of Iraq.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

12231518

No future President will have to Honor the deal...............

But when every other nation that signed it is honoring the deal what's a warmongering Republican going to do. Bomb Iran not because of violation ot an Iranian breakout toward a nuclear weapon. Is he going to startl a war for the purpose of destroying
President Onama's legacy?

 

[eagle1462010]

12231518

No future President will have to Honor the deal...............

But when every other nation that signed it is honoring the deal what's a warmongering Republican going to do. Bomb Iran not because of violation ot an Iranian breakout toward a nuclear weapon. Is he going to startl a war for the purpose of destroying
President Onama's legacy?

Destroy the nuclear sites to prevent them from having them..........................
We don't have to occupy them to do that.................

It has been done before.................and hell...........Israel will do it if we'd get out of the way..........

So, Iran gets to keep sponsoring terror.............Iran still vows to wipe Israel off the map................holds our people.............decides when and where the world will inspect anything...........and gets a load of cash to buy more weapons systems from Russia with love.................

Yep..........What a deal.

 

[JoeB131]

No future President will have to Honor the deal...............

If it's not voted as a treaty with 2/3rd's of the Senate approving...................then by the Constitution we can shred it..................which is all it is worth........except for the Billions offered by the current Numb Nuts in Office.

Except, of course, they won't. Just like they won't overturn ObamaCare.

You see, the thing is, this is the best deal we were ever going to get with the rest of the world eager to open Iran up to commerce again. No future president is going to pooch that for no return, no matter how much the Jew Lobby whines.

 

[JoeB131]

Destroy the nuclear sites to prevent them from having them..........................
We don't have to occupy them to do that.................

It has been done before.................and hell...........Israel will do it if we'd get out of the way..........

the Israelis have attacked single facilities. The Iran program is hundreds of facilities spread all across the country.

The Jews want us to fight their wars for them. Thank C'Thulhu we have a president willing to say "No" to them.

Now to dispense with the rest of your crazy.

So, Iran gets to keep sponsoring terror..

Again, not our problem. Our buddies the Saudis sponsor more terror than the Iranians do.

ran still vows to wipe Israel off the map........

You talk like that's a bad thing!

holds our people

Who voluntarily went into THEIR country and broke THEIR laws.

decides when and where the world will inspect anything.

Not true, but never mind. I'm sure you heard that on Hate Radio, so you think it's true.

and gets a load of cash to buy more weapons systems from Russia with love.

That load of cash were assets that Iran legally owns. We seized them on the basis of them changing their behavior, which they've done.

Yep..........What a deal.

Yes, it is a good deal. You see, here's the thing, Bush so fucked up the Middle East that Iran is the only country that has the ability to bring stablity to the region.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I won't bother with your lying antisemitic imaginary "points".

If you were around in 79 that can only mean you've been in mom's basement for 35 years

I think you are projecting, Cleetus.

Point was, no one wanted to send their kids off to die for the fucking Shah.

Because the cocksucker wasn't worth it. We should have handed him back to the Ayatollah's with a bow around his neck.

This is how I know you're a fucking liar. The Shah had the country under control until the antisemitic Carter decided to fuck over the Shah and Israel by supporting the Islamists and turning Iran over to them

 

[JoeB131]

This is how I know you're a fucking liar. The Shah had the country under control until the antisemitic Carter decided to fuck over the Shah and Israel by supporting the Islamists and turning Iran over to them

Guy, how did Carter do this, exactly?

Did Carter go to the IRanian Military and tell them to not throw down their lives for the Shah, or did they decide that they weren't going to die for this bastard on their own?

does this look like a country someone had under control?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This is how I know you're a fucking liar. The Shah had the country under control until the antisemitic Carter decided to fuck over the Shah and Israel by supporting the Islamists and turning Iran over to them

Guy, how did Carter do this, exactly?

Did Carter go to the IRanian Military and tell them to not throw down their lives for the Shah, or did they decide that they weren't going to die for this bastard on their own?

does this look like a country someone had under control?

Here's what your friends did

 

[whutTHEYsay]

eagle 12235195

Destroy the nuclear sites to prevent them from having them..........................
We don't have to occupy them to do that.................
So, Iran gets to keep sponsoring terror.............

If Iran is abiding by their end of the deal then your Republican President that bombs what you call nuclear sites including peaceful use nuclear sites there will be people who get killed. Your Republican Mad Bomber President is a terrorist because he kills people and destroys property solely to please warmonger constituents like you.

After doing so how does Your warmonger in Chief contain Iranian terrorist activity if you don't invade and occupy the entire country and do regime change and try to run the country to bring about democracy and good relations just like Iraq.

Stopping peaceful use of nuclear power does not resolve anything.

And of course you are incapable of seeing a bigger picture. Iran is on our side against the Daesh terrorist scum in Iraq and Syria. A side benefit of the deal is destroying ISIS through more cooperation with Iran. The Brits have already opened an Embassey in Tehran.!

The past mistakes by Tony Blair in Iraq has not prevented a thaw in Iran:UK relationships.

Kerry noted recently that Iran now can be instrumental in resolving the civil war in Syria. Kerry is already working on resolving that crisis.

U.S. Absolute belligerence toward Iran has exacerbated that crisis situation.

Random bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities by the U.S. or Isreal escalates the violence in the region.

That appears to be what you relish to see in the news everyday.

 

[JoeB131]

Here's what your friends did

Frank, Sweetie, you are trying to change the subject.

Your claim was that if only Carter had done X, those hundreds of thousands of Iranians who took to the streets to demand his ouster would have changed their mind.

So the IRanians took hostages, because we had admitted the Shah into the US for Cancer Treatment, and they wanted this monster who had slaughtered and tortured their people to face justice.

Just can't get worked up about it. If we wanted the hostages back that bad, we should have turned over the Shah.

 

[eagle1462010]

eagle 12235195

Destroy the nuclear sites to prevent them from having them..........................
We don't have to occupy them to do that.................
So, Iran gets to keep sponsoring terror.............

If Iran is abiding by their end of the deal then your Republican President that bombs what you call nuclear sites including peaceful use nuclear sites there will be people who get killed. Your Republican Mad Bomber President is a terrorist because he kills people and destroys property solely to please warmonger constituents like you.

After doing so how does Your warmonger in Chief contain Iranian terrorist activity if you don't invade and occupy the entire country and do regime change and try to run the country to bring about democracy and good relations just like Iraq.

Stopping peaceful use of nuclear power does not resolve anything.

And of course you are incapable of seeing a bigger picture. Iran is on our side against the Daesh terrorist scum in Iraq and Syria. A side benefit of the deal is destroying ISIS through more cooperation with Iran. The Brits have already opened an Embassey in Tehran.!

The past mistakes by Tony Blair in Iraq has not prevented a thaw in Iran:UK relationships.

Kerry noted recently that Iran now can be instrumental in resolving the civil war in Syria. Kerry is already working on resolving that crisis.

U.S. Absolute belligerence toward Iran has exacerbated that crisis situation.

Random bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities by the U.S. or Isreal escalates the violence in the region.

That appears to be what you relish to see in the news everyday.

Coming from a typical poster who doesn't want Nuclear Power here...........We can't build them here and it is urgent that they have them in Iran..............Sell that snake oil somewhere else.......................They want it to join the nuclear club and NOT TO PRODUCE POWER...........They want ICBM tech from Russia for that very reason as well.................and now we are going to release more money to do so..........not to mention the weapon purchasing from Russia and China who want the money for weapons after release...................

Random bombing.................lol........nothing random about targets where we know the facilities are at...............They are a terrorist nation...........you don't do a deal with a terrorist nation unless you are an idiot................

 

[eagle1462010]

Destroy the nuclear sites to prevent them from having them..........................
We don't have to occupy them to do that.................

It has been done before.................and hell...........Israel will do it if we'd get out of the way..........

the Israelis have attacked single facilities. The Iran program is hundreds of facilities spread all across the country.

The Jews want us to fight their wars for them. Thank C'Thulhu we have a president willing to say "No" to them.

Now to dispense with the rest of your crazy.

So, Iran gets to keep sponsoring terror..

Again, not our problem. Our buddies the Saudis sponsor more terror than the Iranians do.

ran still vows to wipe Israel off the map........

You talk like that's a bad thing!

holds our people

Who voluntarily went into THEIR country and broke THEIR laws.

decides when and where the world will inspect anything.

Not true, but never mind. I'm sure you heard that on Hate Radio, so you think it's true.

and gets a load of cash to buy more weapons systems from Russia with love.

That load of cash were assets that Iran legally owns. We seized them on the basis of them changing their behavior, which they've done.

Yep..........What a deal.

Yes, it is a good deal. You see, here's the thing, Bush so fucked up the Middle East that Iran is the only country that has the ability to bring stablity to the region.

Joe admits again that he wants Israel destroyed................Not a bad thing..........right Joe......................are you really Joe Mohamed............

 

[eagle1462010]

Here's what your friends did

Frank, Sweetie, you are trying to change the subject.

Your claim was that if only Carter had done X, those hundreds of thousands of Iranians who took to the streets to demand his ouster would have changed their mind.

So the IRanians took hostages, because we had admitted the Shah into the US for Cancer Treatment, and they wanted this monster who had slaughtered and tortured their people to face justice.

Just can't get worked up about it. If we wanted the hostages back that bad, we should have turned over the Shah.

The taking of our embassy.........and the holding of our hostages were an act of war.................peanut head allowed them to be held 444 days.........

Now 3 decades later, they are more of a problem than dealing with it then..................They turned them over the day Reagan took office, as he had vowed to blow their asses off the map..................................

That is how you deal with a terrorist supporting nation...........Not throw money at them.............

Poor things can't produce power without Nuclear fuel....................yeah right.

 

[mamooth]

Reagan traded arms to the Iranians.

But then, that's real history, so most conservatives will be entirely ignorant of it.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

The taking of our embassy.........and the holding of our hostages were an act of war.................peanut head allowed them to be held 444 days.........

Yeah Reagan? Tough guy. Called the Mujahadeen freedom fighters and after 220 U.S. Marines were killed on his watch - he did what the terrorists wanted - tucked tail and ran. Your heroes have piss poor performance when the bullets hit the bone.