What a ridiculous post. Keep your whole sin/punishment thing in your church and impose it on people who agree with you.
Would you please find where I spoke of "sin/punishment?" I can see you're eager to turn this into an argument over religious doctrine. Sadly (for you) I don't play that game...
So you've been directly challenged to show where in the position to whic you're responding here, that I advanced the concept of 'sin/punishment'... Your failure (which is a 100% certainty) will be your default concession that the entirety of you're position is founded on the typical false premise of an adleminded leftist, discrediting you and bringing shame to your Mother and Father for not doing a better job of educating you.
I am really grateful that you proved my point, though.
I eviscerated your point, refuting it in its entirety. But IF you can show where I, in fact, made your point, I'll be more than happy to discuss it... Naturally, your failure to show from the position to which you're responding here that I, in fact, proved your point will be your default concession that your position is IN FACT: A LIE, advanced for no other purpose than to DECEIVE THIS BOARD.
Has nothing to do with life... has to do with sin and punishment ... for the harlots.
Would you please find where I spoke of "sin/punishment?" I can see you're eager to turn this into an argument over religious doctrine. Sadly (for you) I don't play that game...
So you've been directly challenged to show where in the position to whic you're responding here, that I advanced the concept of 'sin/punishment'... Your failure (which is a 100% certainty) will be your default concession that the entirety of you're position is founded on the typical false premise of an adleminded leftist, discrediting you and bringing shame to your Mother and Father for not doing a better job of educating you.
"nullifying the reproductive responsibility for those decisions"???????
make your own decisions.... you sure aren't grounded enough to make mine.
You've a right to decide when, where and with WHOM you engage in sexual intercourse... meaning you have a right to CHOOSE. Your choice is a simple one:
A-To engage in sexual intercourse
B-To NOT engage in sexual intercourse.
Our culture gives the female TOTAL AUTHORITY IN THIS DECISION... That authority rests on the awesome responsibility she bears in reproduction. Should a man force himself into a woman, violating her right to decide who enters her body, our culture will come down on them with both feet and upon the facts proving their offense, we will recognize that they have forfeited their own rights by having ursurped those of the woman and in many cases execute them, stripping them of their very lives... the best they can hope for is prlonged periods of incarceration; 15,20-30 years in prison and a lifetime of being identifed for their usurpation of the right of a woman to choose her reproductive fate.
What you and the idiocracy are trying to do; what Hussein is speaking to here, is the desire to strip women of the responsibility for their CHOICE. He is saying that just because a young female makes a choice to engage in intercourse, she shouldn't be punished by bearing the responsibility for that choice... and in so doing he is saying that the life conceived through that choice is not entitled to it's right to live and pursue the fulfullment of that life.
Now the position that the choice to engage in the biological function which is designed by nature to conceive a human being, should not be one to which a woman is held accountable means the women are no longer the bearers of the awesome responsibility of rearing a child... thus the act of rape will be reasonably recognized in short order (a generation or two at the most), as nothing more than assault... men will no longer face capital punishment for violating a woman's right to choose, because she is not bearing any real responsibility in the act of intercourse.
Secondly, the position, at BEST Discounts the very foundation of the United States... the right of the individual to their life and to pursue the fulfillment of that life. It does so by the overt denial of the life of the conceived human being which is set for termination on no other consideration than that life is an inconvenience. Thus the culture no longer accepts the premise that human life itself is precious; it no longer respects the principle of inalienable human rights endowed by their Creator: Nature's God; rights which exist on the ultimate authority of that Creator, thus that culture no longer recognizes the premise that the only valid function of government is to protect the means of the INDIVIDUAL to exercise those rights...
Now I ask you sis... The cruxt of my argument is that human rights rest on nothing but the responsibility which is inherent in them... If the viability of your human right to choose when, where and with whom you allow to intercouse with your body DOES NOT REST UPON THE RESPONSIBILITY TO BEAR THE PRODUCT OF THAT DECISION... then what precisely do you feel human rights are, how do they work? What makes a human right, a human right?
Best of luck with that list sis... Your failure to provide a well reasoned, logically valid, intellectually sound response, through which you support your position will, of course, be your default concession that you truly have no earthly idea about the scope and breadth of this issue, the principles involved or the certain ramifications which must come should the culture respond in favor of your implied goals.
