Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[Delldude]

The only tradecraft concerns were about the one point.

Stop. Every department and every one in the assessment had concerns.

Leaks were the rule of the day and took more credence than anything in the assessment.

 

[Marener]

Stop. Every department and every one in the assessment had concerns.

Leaks were the rule of the day and took more credence than anything in the assessment.

The leaks were all perfectly consistent with the evidence.

Again, the ICA's conclusions were further demonstrated to be accurate after prolonged investigation by nonpartisan and bipartisan groups.

Gabbard is a hack who is creating a hoax.

For instance, when she claims the FBI and CIA had said they had low confidence that the leaks came from Russia. That was from September 2016. She seems to think it would be impossible for them to change their assessment as the months go by and they continue to investigate and gather information.

The only person creating false intelligence is Gabbard.

 

[Delldude]

The leaks were all perfectly consistent with the evidence.

Boosheet

For instance, when she claims the FBI and CIA had said they had low confidence that the leaks came from Russia. That was from September 2016.

It is also from an unpublished PDB that wasn't released.............Gee wonder why?

 

[Marener]

Boosheet

It is also from an unpublished PDB that wasn't released.............Gee wonder why?

Gabbard is a hack and conflating two different concepts of "hacking the election".

No one in the Obama administration believed that Russia attacked election infrastructure that could change the vote totals.

But they did assess, correctly, that Russia hacked the DNC and released those emails to influence the outcome of the election.

She starts talking about one type of hacking, and then pretends they're all under the same umbrella. She's purposefully misleading people who aren't smart enough to see what she's doing.

It's funny how you chastised me for pulling from the Mueller report, which was an apolitical investigation, but you have no problem pulling the bullshit from Gabbard's hack job.

She's creating a hoax. She's committing far worse sins than Clapper or Brennan. She's outright lying.

 

[Delldude]

But they did assess, correctly, that Russia hacked the DNC and released those emails to influence the outcome of the election.

That's a crock of shit. Those emails were leaked right before the DNC convention and it showed that Bernie Sanders who was the front runner at the time, wasn't who DNC wanted. They wanted Hillary, Wassermann-Shulz was exposed and fired from info in those emails. Hillary's campaign was damaged by her own party and could have been a contributing factor to her demise and loss.
Had nothing to do with Trumps campaign.

It's funny how you chastised me for pulling from the Mueller report, which was an apolitical investigation, but you have no problem pulling the bullshit from Gabbard's hack job.

Apolitical, where you pull that out of? Weissman had everyone wipe their phones, Strozx was bounced from the investigation for those very same reasons.

She's committing far worse sins than Clapper or Brennan. She's outright lying.

She's doing her job. See how this goes when a GJ hears evidence.

 

[Marener]

That's a crock of shit. Those emails were leaked right before the DNC convention and it showed that Bernie Sanders who was the front runner at the time, wasn't who DNC wanted. They wanted Hillary, Wassermann-Shulz was exposed and fired from info in those emails. Hillary's campaign was damaged by her own party and could have been a contributing factor to her demise and loss.
Had nothing to do with Trumps campaign.


Apolitical, where you pull that out of? Weissman had everyone wipe their phones, Strozx was bounced from the investigation for those very same reasons.




She's doing her job. See how this goes when a GJ hears evidence.

Bernie Sanders wasn’t the front runner. What the **** are you talking about?

 

[Delldude]

Bernie Sanders wasn’t the front runner. What the **** are you talking about?

In the early stages of the dem primary he was.

 

[Marener]

In the early stages of the dem primary he was.

I’m almost done trying to talk about this with you. You said he was the front runner at the time of the DNC convention which is not the earliest stages.

Those emails were leaked right before the DNC convention and it showed that Bernie Sanders who was the front runner at the time, wasn't who DNC wanted

You are not arguing in good faith.

 

[Delldude]

You said he was the front runner at the time of the DNC convention which is not the earliest stages.

Why this then:

US President Donald Trump has called for an investigation after a Hillary Clinton supporter said the Democratic party "rigged" its primary for her.

CNN asked Senator Elizabeth Warren if Mrs Clinton's contest against Democratic rival Bernie Sanders was rigged, and she said: "Yes."

Another Democratic official writes in a new book about the party's "unethical" agreement with the Clinton campaign.

You are not arguing in good faith.

Boy, coming from you, that's priceless.

 

[Marener]

Why this then:

US President Donald Trump has called for an investigation after a Hillary Clinton supporter said the Democratic party "rigged" its primary for her.

CNN asked Senator Elizabeth Warren if Mrs Clinton's contest against Democratic rival Bernie Sanders was rigged, and she said: "Yes."

Another Democratic official writes in a new book about the party's "unethical" agreement with the Clinton campaign.


Boy, coming from you, that's priceless.

So are you going to acknowledge the fact that you lied about Sanders being the front runner at the DNC and then lied about the fact that you said it?

 

[Delldude]

So are you going to acknowledge the fact that you lied about Sanders being the front runner at the DNC and then lied about the fact that you said it?

I didn't make the statement with the intent to deceive like you do.

 

[Marener]

I didn't make the statement with the intent to deceive like you do.

It shows you just say shit because you want it to be true. You don’t actually care if it’s true or not. It’s just whatever is convenient.

You’re a hack like Gabbard.

 

[Delldude]

It shows you just say shit because you want it to be true. You don’t actually care if it’s true or not. It’s just whatever is convenient.

That's exactly what you do in every argument.

Better luck next time on the fraudulent intel.

 

[protectionist]

Flynn is a fascist.

Everyone who is a conservative, is a "fascist", so says the looney left.

 

[protectionist]

Everyone who is a conservative, is a "fascist", so says the looney left.

 

[protectionist]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Lying under oath was done by Obama et al when none of them were president, immunity a non-factor, as was fabricating "evidence".
All these scoundrols could be convicted, and spend years in prison, totally aside from any treason charges.
Hu hum. yawn****

 

[konradv]

Lying under oath was done by Obama et al when none of them were president, immunity a non-factor, as was fabricating "evidence".
All these scoundrols could be convicted, and spend years in prison, totally aside from any treason charges.
Hu hum. yawn****

 

[protectionist]

But it wasn’t false.

It was confirmed to be accurate by the Mueller report and the Senate intelligence report.

They were found to be false.

Did Putin want Trump to win?

• The Obama report said that “Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability” and that Putin had a “clear preference for President-elect Trump.”
• But the House report contradicted this, saying that Putin’s “principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process.” The Russian strongman also seemed to expect Clinton to win, and held back on “some compromising material for post-election use against the expected Clinton administration.”
• The Senate report said lawmakers were given “specific intelligence reporting to support the assessment that Putin and the Russian Government demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump.”

Did Russia alter the 2016 election?

• To buttress Tulsi Gabbard's claims that the Obama intel report was political interference, she highlighted the findings of multiple intelligence agencies that Russia “had neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the US election.”
• On this, all three reports are in agreement.

 

[protectionist]

Their passports are being cancelled/conficated, and private pilots and airports have been put on alert to stop these crooks. Could Obama disguise himself, or pay off somebody ? If he's going to head out for a non-extradition country, he better do it fast.

Michael Flynn: urges DOJ to confiscate former President Obama's passport

Michael Flynn: urges DOJ to confiscate former President Obama's passport

www.ainvest.com

 

[konradv]

Their passports are being cancelled/conficated, and private pilots and airports have been put on alert to stop these crooks. Could Obama disguise himself, or pay off somebody ? If he's going to head out for a non-extradition country, he better do it fast.

Michael Flynn: urges DOJ to confiscate former President Obama's passport

Michael Flynn: urges DOJ to confiscate former President Obama's passport

www.ainvest.com