- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,466
- 10,043
- 900
- Thread starter
- #21
Invading an oil rich Arab Nation that was not involved in the attacks of 9-11was exactly what bin Laden was hoping President Bush would do.
Right! Bush played right into Bin Laden's hands right?
No mind there were 28 million people freed from a drill/plier wielding dictator that used oil money for palaces while 2.7 million would have starved!
YUP that was a real disaster. And of course Bin Laden LOVED these politicians for their encouraging the terrorists who planted bombs on kids to explode when reaching for candy from US troops! Yea that was his plan all along to get these Idiots to endorse the terrorists by making statements like these which were replayed thousands of times by a compliant MSM that hated Bush and the fact that 28 million people were freed!
You really have to be so out of touch with reality to ever think terrorists would NOT take these statements to recruit more terrorists!
Yep he wanted to get the US involved in a long drawn out war of occupation like the Soviet Union did in the 80's. He didn't understand how vast our resource were compared to the Soviet Union. We were not bleed dry like they were. However by destroying Iraq and opening it's borders the region seems to be on the verge of a wider conflict.
So terrorist take out of context quotes from politicians and make shit up about them. Is that some kind of a confession?
It explains how come the war was won in less then 6 weeks but because sympathizers like you and these traitors ENCOURAGED terrorism while the MSM bashing Bush pushed these
stories so often people like you believed them!
YOU tell me are you not at least glad that 2.7 million children did starve to death as they would have if Saddam were still in power today?
Maybe you should talk to Iraqis like this guy did..
The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg put the question to Barham Salih, the former prime minister of Iraqi Kurdistan's regional government and a former deputy prime minister of Iraq's federal government.
"But," he added, "it's important to understand where we started from. ...
Literally hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were sent to mass graves.
Ten years on from the demise of Saddam Hussein, we're still discovering mass graves across Iraq.
And Iraqis are better off without Saddam Hussein -- the overwhelming majority of Iraqis are better off without Saddam Hussein."
So the Iraq war was, despite all that went wrong, a good thing; the "overwhelming majority" of Iraqis are (and presumably feel) better off because of it; and the fault for all that has gone wrong is ultimately with Iraqis themselves: It's a remarkable point of view to encounter in June 2013.
10 Years After the Fall of Saddam, How Do Iraqis Look Back on the War? - J.J. Gould - The Atlantic
Now you tell me if Iraqis would still like the GDP they "enjoyed" In 2002 (Under Saddam) of $802 per person
in 2012 per person $4,600...a GDP/capita growth rate averaged 47% per year over the 10 years !
But you DON"T want them to prosper. YOU wanted them to suffer with the drill/plier wielding dictator who trade oil for food and built palaces... YOU were happy with that right??