Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
National security.I'm just wondering why supposed free market advocates would think it's the President's responsibility to keep gas prices low.
Gas prices are below $3.00 a gallon.
Thank your Mr. President.
10 percent of the nation's gas stations are now selling gasoline at less than $3 a gallon.
How many times do you want him to give it? We're not going to keep doing YOUR homework dude. LOL
maybe you have links, then.The proof is out for all to seeIt's all bs, beyond the kernel of truth that early on in Obama's presidency they decided that X$ per gallon would support alternatives. Nothing new there. Cheney said the same. They did give out money to battery builders, and I disagreed with that. No subsidizing by the govt.
you posted this chick
Obama on gas prices - Searchya - Search Results Yahoo Search Results
It does not support your assertion. In fact, even what little support it offered was .... false. For example, the USNewsandWR "opinion" piece said some yes and some no, and the support for Obama being one cause was tied to closing the marcus hook refinery. However, the refinery is now being refurbished to process natl gas, and Obama was not the cause of it stopping refining gasoline.
Sunoco to sell or close its refineries in Philadelphia Marcus Hook
So, you have nothing but preconceived ideological assertions
Well, again the problem is that Obama has taken some regulatory steps the do increase energy costs. Is shutting down coal elec plants early really going to have any global CO2 effect, or is our action really going to influence the Chinese? I don't think so. There's an annoying elitist tone to the potus, and frankly his administration seemed almost gleeful in noting energy prices for carbon fuel have risen to make alternatives more feasible. I didn't find this fact to be cheering. (-:you posted this chick
Obama on gas prices - Searchya - Search Results Yahoo Search Results
It does not support your assertion. In fact, even what little support it offered was .... false. For example, the USNewsandWR "opinion" piece said some yes and some no, and the support for Obama being one cause was tied to closing the marcus hook refinery. However, the refinery is now being refurbished to process natl gas, and Obama was not the cause of it stopping refining gasoline.
Sunoco to sell or close its refineries in Philadelphia Marcus Hook
So, you have nothing but preconceived ideological assertions
That area is nasty. But aren't they all...
National security.I'm just wondering why supposed free market advocates would think it's the President's responsibility to keep gas prices low.
RW's are a laugh a minute
Obama is keeping us dependent of for (or domestic) oil?National security.I'm just wondering why supposed free market advocates would think it's the President's responsibility to keep gas prices low.
Hmm.... keeping us dependent on oil in the name of national security? Hmmmm....
hahahahahaha..that's a good one!National security.I'm just wondering why supposed free market advocates would think it's the President's responsibility to keep gas prices low.
Hmm.... keeping us dependent on oil in the name of national security? Hmmmm....
RW's are a laugh a minute
They sure are. Also: LW's
Thanks, Kosh, for finding better copy!!
Are you like, deaf? He doesn't say anything like that there.
The POTUS can't spike (or drop) gas prices anyway, even if he wanted to. Oil doesn't work that way. The price of petrol has nothing to do with the POTUS.
Didn't we just do this? Were you going "la la la can't hear you"?
Gas prices are below $3.00 a gallon.
Thank your Mr. President.
10 percent of the nation's gas stations are now selling gasoline at less than $3 a gallon.
Again .... Link?
hahahahahaha..that's a good one!National security.I'm just wondering why supposed free market advocates would think it's the President's responsibility to keep gas prices low.
Hmm.... keeping us dependent on oil in the name of national security? Hmmmm....
In case you hadn't heard the entire world is "dependent" on oil. Maintaining reliable, low cost supplies and access is good for america.
Thanks for the laugh, though!
It's good for oil companies. But I wonder where we'd be now if American ingenuity had been faced with the same gas prices the rest of the world dealt with for the last thirty years. On to something better, is my guess. But we're not. We're mired in whining for low gas prices.